research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

A new hexa­gonal polymorph of magnesium perchlorate hexa­hydrate obtained from an acetamide medium

crossmark logo

aInstitute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Akad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 107, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 31 March 2026; accepted 11 May 2026; online 12 May 2026)

A new magnesium perchlorate hexa­hydrate phase, Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O, was obtained from the mixed solvents of water and acetamide. The structure crystallizes in the hexa­gonal space group P63mc and is isostructural with previously reported M(ClO4)2·6H2O (M = Zn, Ni, Fe) phases. The Mg site is half occupied, indicating positional disorder of the metal cation. Prolonged crystallization leads to the formation of larger crystals consistent with an expanded unit cell, suggesting the formation of a disorder-related superstructure. The Mg, Cl and one of the O atoms have 3m. site symmetry.

1. Chemical context

Magnesium perchlorate, Mg(ClO4)2, forms several hydrated crystalline phases, including the dihydrate, tetra­hydrate and hexa­hydrate, which exhibit structural variability depending on crystallization conditions. Early studies described the hexa­hydrate as ortho­rhom­bic, while later investigations revealed additional structural complexity and possible disorder effects. Previously reported crystal structures of magnesium perchlorate hydrates include ortho­rhom­bic and monoclinic phases (West, 1934View full citation; Robertson & Bish, 2010View full citation; Solovyov, 2012View full citation).

Compounds of the general type M(ClO4)2·6H2O (M = Zn, Ni, Fe) have been reported to adopt closely related structures characterized by metal-site disorder and partial occupancies (Ghosh & Ray, 1976View full citation; Ghosh et al., 1997View full citation). These studies demonstrate that the disorder of the metal position is an intrinsic feature of this structural family and plays a key role in determining symmetry and phase behavior.

The present structure therefore represents a hexa­gonal polymorph of magnesium perchlorate hexa­hydrate, distinct from previously reported ortho­rhom­bic and monoclinic forms. The compound was obtained from an acetamide-containing medium, indicating that the crystallization environment plays a significant role in directing phase formation in the Mg–ClO4–H2O system.

2. Structural commentary

The title compound, Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O, crystallizes in the hexa­gonal space group P63mc with a = b = 7.7942 (3) Å and c = 5.2703 (3) Å. The Mg2+ cation (site symmetry 3m.) is coordinated by six water mol­ecules, forming a slightly distorted octa­hedral [Mg(H2O)6]2+ environment (Fig. 1[link]). The six Mg—O distances are identical by symmetry at 2.126 (5), while the perchlorate anions retain their usual tetra­hedral geometry with Cl—O distances of 1.426 (5) and 1.428 (3) Å.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Arrangement of Mg(H2O)6 octa­hedra and ClO4 tetra­hedra in Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O viewed along [100]. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

The magnesium octa­hedra are connected through shared faces [Mg1⋯Mg1 = 2.63515 (15) Å], forming infinite chains extending along the [001] direction with Mg1—O1—Mg1 = 76.57 (9)°. The half-occupancy of the Mg site implies the presence of disordered inter­ruptions within these chains, resulting in vacant positions along the columns. When this inter­ruption becomes ordered, a lowering of symmetry occurs, leading to ortho­rhom­bic structures (Ghosh et al., 1997View full citation). In contrast, when the disorder is maintained, the structure retains higher symmetry in the hexa­gonal space group. This behavior is consistent with previously reported Zn and Ni perchlorate hexa­hydrate structures (Ghosh & Ray, 1976View full citation), where similar disorder-driven symmetry relationships have been observed.

The perchlorate anions (Cl site symmetry 3m.) occupy inter­stitial positions and consolidate the structure through electrostatic inter­actions. During crystallization, large needle-shaped crystals were observed, corresponding to an expanded unit cell of approximately 15 × 15 × 5 Å. This suggests the formation of a superstructure related to partial disorder or long-range ordering effects.

3. Supra­molecular features

The structure is consolidated by O1—H1⋯O3i [symmetry code: (i) 1 − x + y, 1 − x, z) hydrogen bonds involving the coordinated water mol­ecule [H⋯O = 2.20 Å, O⋯O = 3.041 (4) Å, O—H⋯O = 155°], which link the coordination octa­hedra into a three-dimensional network. The arrangement of the octa­hedral chains and hydrogen-bond network viewed along the [001] direction is shown in Fig. 2[link].

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Packing of the crystal structure of Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O viewed along [001], illustrating the hydrogen-bonded framework and disordered octa­hedral chains.

4. Database survey

Previously reported crystal structures of magnesium perchlorate hydrates include ortho­rhom­bic and monoclinic polymorphs (West, 1934View full citation; Robertson & Bish, 2010View full citation; Solovyov, 2012View full citation). Related disordered perchlorate hexa­hydrates containing divalent metal cations such as Zn, Ni and Fe have also been described (Ghosh & Ray, 1976View full citation; Ghosh et al., 1997View full citation). These compounds exhibit similar disorder-related structural features, including partial occupancies of the metal positions and disorder-driven symmetry relationships between hexa­gonal and ortho­rhom­bic forms.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The compound was obtained in the system Mg(ClO4)2:m(acetamide):n(H2O) by solution crystallization followed by slow evaporation at room temperature. The mixture forms a viscous liquid phase.

Crystallization occurs over approximately two days, yielding large needle-like crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction at early stages. Continued crystallization leads to deterioration in crystal quality and increased structural disorder.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1[link]. The model indicates the presence of disorder, as reflected in elevated displacement parameters and features identified in the checkCIF analysis. The hydrogen atom of the coordinated water mol­ecules was included in a calculated position and refined using a riding model.

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O
Mr 165.65
Crystal system, space group Hexagonal, P63mc
Temperature (K) 273
a, c (Å) 7.7942 (3), 5.2703 (3)
V3) 277.27 (3)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.72
Crystal size (mm) 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.870, 0.932
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7335, 234, 229
Rint 0.038
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.624
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.024, 0.065, 1.20
No. of reflections 234
No. of parameters 22
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.15, −0.20
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 98 quotients [(I+)−(I)]/[(I+)+(I)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter 0.04 (3)
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Magnesium perchlorate hexahydrate top
Crystal data top
Mg(ClO4)2·6H2ODx = 1.984 Mg m3
Mr = 165.65Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hexagonal, P63mcCell parameters from 4768 reflections
a = 7.7942 (3) Åθ = 3.0–25.9°
c = 5.2703 (3) ŵ = 0.72 mm1
V = 277.27 (3) Å3T = 273 K
Z = 2Block, clear white
F(000) = 1700.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
229 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tubeRint = 0.038
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.870, Tmax = 0.932k = 99
7335 measured reflectionsl = 66
234 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.065 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0391P)2 + 0.061P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.20(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
234 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
22 parametersΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 98 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.04 (3)
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Mg10.0000000.0000000.2498 (12)0.0239 (7)0.5
O10.12365 (19)0.12365 (19)0.5000 (9)0.0467 (7)
H10.2554410.0788000.4991430.070*
Cl10.6666670.3333330.49460 (13)0.0291 (4)
O20.6666670.3333330.2241 (10)0.0576 (17)
O30.8658 (5)0.4329 (2)0.5864 (8)0.0579 (10)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mg10.0220 (9)0.0220 (9)0.0277 (12)0.0110 (4)0.0000.000
O10.0418 (10)0.0418 (10)0.0639 (14)0.0264 (11)0.0007 (9)0.0007 (9)
Cl10.0237 (5)0.0237 (5)0.0400 (6)0.0118 (2)0.0000.000
O20.067 (3)0.067 (3)0.040 (3)0.0333 (13)0.0000.000
O30.0294 (16)0.0534 (15)0.083 (2)0.0147 (8)0.0159 (15)0.0079 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mg1—Mg1i2.6352 (1)Mg1—O1vi2.126 (5)
Mg1—Mg1ii2.6351 (1)O1—H10.9046
Mg1—O1i2.126 (5)O1—H1vii0.9046
Mg1—O12.127 (5)Cl1—O21.426 (5)
Mg1—O1iii2.127 (5)Cl1—O31.428 (3)
Mg1—O1iv2.126 (5)Cl1—O3viii1.428 (3)
Mg1—O1v2.127 (5)Cl1—O3ix1.428 (3)
O1i—Mg1—O1v94.35 (6)O1iv—Mg1—O1iii94.35 (6)
O1vi—Mg1—O1iii94.35 (6)Mg1ii—O1—Mg176.57 (9)
O1vi—Mg1—O1i85.7 (2)Mg1ii—O1—H1vii120.83 (7)
O1i—Mg1—O194.35 (6)Mg1ii—O1—H1120.8
O1iv—Mg1—O194.35 (6)Mg1—O1—H1vii120.39 (7)
O1vi—Mg1—O1v94.35 (6)Mg1—O1—H1120.4
O1iv—Mg1—O1i85.7 (2)H1—O1—H1vii99.1
O1—Mg1—O1v85.6 (2)O2—Cl1—O3viii109.79 (19)
O1i—Mg1—O1iii179.9 (3)O2—Cl1—O3109.79 (19)
O1iv—Mg1—O1v179.9 (3)O2—Cl1—O3ix109.79 (19)
O1vi—Mg1—O1179.9 (3)O3—Cl1—O3viii109.15 (19)
O1iv—Mg1—O1vi85.7 (2)O3ix—Cl1—O3109.15 (19)
O1v—Mg1—O1iii85.6 (2)O3ix—Cl1—O3viii109.15 (19)
O1—Mg1—O1iii85.6 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) xy, x, z1/2; (ii) xy, x, z+1/2; (iii) x+y, x, z; (iv) y, x+y, z1/2; (v) y, xy, z; (vi) x, y, z1/2; (vii) y, x, z; (viii) x+y+1, x+1, z; (ix) y+1, xy, z.
 

Funding information

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Science Fund of Bulgaria (Contract No: K-06-H64/4).

References

Return to citationBruker (2016). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGhosh, M. & Ray, S. (1976). Z. Kristallogr. 145, 146–154.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationGhosh, S., Mukherjee, M., Seal, A. & Ray, S. (1997). Acta Cryst. B53, 639–644.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationRobertson, K. & Bish, D. (2010). Acta Cryst. B66, 579–584.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSolovyov, L. A. (2012). Acta Cryst. B68, 89–90.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWest, C. D. (1934). Z. Kristallogr. 91, 480–493.  CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds