research communications
Crystal structures of two hydrous sodium potassium molybdates: Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 and NaK(MoO4)(H2O)
aUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Mineralogy & Petrography, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Single-crystals of the hydrated sodium potassium orthomolybdate phases Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9, trisodium potassium bis(orthomolybdate) nonahydrate, and NaK(MoO4)(H2O), sodium potassium orthomolybdate monohydrate, were obtained as by-products in a flux growth experiment aiming on the synthesis of silicates from the quaternary system Na2O–K2O–CaO–SiO2. The asymmetric unit of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 (space group P63/m, Z = 2) comprises one Na+ atom and one water molecule on a mirror plane, one K+ atom on a 6 axis, one Mo6+ cation and one O atom on a threefold rotation axis, and one O atom and one water molecule in general sites. The is built from isolated MoO4 tetrahedra, which are linked by common corners to trimers containing three face-sharing Na(H2O)4O2 octahedra. Linkage between the heteropolyhedral groups is provided by potassium cations, which are coordinated by six water molecules in form of trigonal prisms. The resulting layers are located at z = 1/4 and z = 3/4, respectively. Intra- and inter-layer hydrogen bonds between the water molecules and the oxygen atoms of the MoO4 tetrahedra consolidate the structure. The backbone of the of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) (space group P212121, Z = 4) is made from chains of edge-sharing Na(H2O)2O4 octahedra running parallel [100], which are decorated by MoO4 tetrahedra via corner sharing. Neighbouring heteropolyhedral chains are linked by additional potassium cations, which are coordinated by seven oxygen ligands and one water molecule. Moreover, intra- and inter-chain hydrogen bonds exist.
Keywords: crystal structure; molybdate; hydrogen-bonding; mixed-alkali compound.
1. Chemical context
Oxidomolybdates offer the crystallographer a rich playground for structural investigations. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that the Mo atoms have the capacity to form covalent bonds with four, five or six oxygen atoms. The sharing of common oxygen atoms between the respective polyhedra facilitates the formation of larger negatively charged polyanions, including isolated groups, chains, and ultimately, three-dimensional frameworks (Krivovichev, 2009
). Consequently, it is not unexpected that a multitude of molybdate structures have been documented in the present literature. If water molecules are allowed to become incorporated, a further increase in the number of crystalline phases will be observed. In the event that the charge-compensating cations are restricted to group 1 elements, the current web version (5.5.0) of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD; Zagorac et al., 2019
) contains a total of 153 entries of anhydrous plus another 41 entries of hydrous phases. Hydrous alkali molybdates have also some industrial applications. For example, sodium molybdate dihydrate is used in corrosion science to protect metal surfaces, as it is a non-oxidizing anodic inhibitor (Vukasovich & Farr, 1986
; Milošev, 2024
). It is also used as a micronutrient to remedy problems in crops due to low molybdenum concentration in soils (O'Neil, 2013
).
To the best of the author's knowledge, only a few systematic investigations on the system Na2MoO4 – K2MoO4 – H2O have been performed so far. Mirzoev et al. (2007
, 2010
) studied the phase relations at 298 and 323 K and observed the following compounds: Na2(MoO4)(H2O)2, Na3K(MoO4)2, K2(MoO4) and Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. It was not possible to obtain the nonahydrate during the crystallization experiments conducted at 323 K. The latter compound was already mentioned in an earlier publication by Klevtsova et al. (1990
), even though no detailed information on the synthesis conditions were given. Notably, no further hydrous mixed sodium potassium molybdate was found. As (i) the crystal structure of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 has not been reported or deposited in databases such as the ICSD, and (ii) the existence of a previously unknown phase with composition NaK(MoO4)(H2O) was observed in our experiments, a decision was taken to investigate both compounds using single-crystal X-ray diffraction in more detail.
2. Structural commentary
2.1. Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9
Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 is isostructural with Na3Rb(MoO4)2(H2O)9 (ICSD-entry no. 39293, based on the data published by Klevtsova et al., 1990
) and Na3K(WO4)2(H2O)9 (ICSD-entry no. 39294; Klevtsova et al., 1990
). The compound crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P63/m. The unit cell contains two formula units. The structure comprises insular MoO4 tetrahedra (Fig. 1
) occupying the Wyckoff-position 4f (site symmetry 3..). The Mo—O bond lengths range from 1.753 (3) to 1.768 (2) Å (Table 1
). The distances between the Mo atoms and the three basal O2 atoms are slightly larger than the corresponding bond lengths to the apical O1 atom. The average value <Mo—O> = 1.764 Å is in perfect agreement with the value reported by Gagné & Hawthorne (2020
) for hexavalent Mo[4] obtained from a bond-length dispersion analysis of more than 1700 individual bonds. The six O—Mo—O angles have values that are very close to the ideal tetrahedral angle of 109.5°. The degree of tetrahedral distortion can be quantified using the following two parameters: quadratic elongation (QE) and angle variance (AV) (Robinson et al., 1971
). The numerical values for these parameters reflect the very low degree of distortion: QE = 1.000 and AV = 0.14. The sodium cations are located on mirror planes perpendicular to [001] (Wyckoff-position 6h) and are octahedrally coordinated by four water molecules and two oxygen atoms belonging to two symmetry-equivalent MoO4 units (Fig. 2
). Three adjacent octahedra form a Na3O2(H2O)9 group, in which two faces of each octahedron are shared by the other two octahedra belonging to the same trimer (Fig. 3
). The faces are defined by two O1 atoms and one O3W molecule. Notably, the O1–O1 edge is a common element of all three faces. The barycentres of the group (site symmetry ), located at the midpoint of the central O1–O1 edge, have the fractional coordinates of 1/3 2/3 1/4 and 2/3 1/3 3/4, respectively. As may be anticipated, the bonds between Na and the two terminal (unshared) O4W oxygen atoms of the Na(H2O)4O2 octahedra are significantly shorter [2.343 (2) Å] than the corresponding bond lengths to the bridging O atoms of the group (average value = 2.416 Å). The corresponding distortion parameters have values of QE = 1.018 and AV = 64.18. The trimers are decorated by MoO4 tetrahedra on both sides sharing a common oxygen atom O1, which implies that the tetrahedra point in opposite directions (Fig. 4
). The resulting heteropolyhedral unit has the composition Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2. The potassium cations (Wyckoff-position 2a) are coordinated by six water molecules (Fig. 5
). The coordination polyhedron corresponds to a trigonal prism with site symmetry . A single K(H2O)6 prism shares three O4W–O4W edges with Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2 groups that are directly adjacent. Consequently, mixed-polyhedral layers are formed at z = 1/4 and z = 3/4 that are parallel to (001) (Fig. 6
). Further linkage between the polyhedra is facilitated by hydrogen bonding. A projection of the whole structure parallel to [010] is shown in Fig. 7
. Indeed, each of the three basal oxygen atoms (O2) of the tetrahedra are acceptors of one inter-layer (O2⋯H42) and two intra-layer (O2⋯H41, O2⋯H3) hydrogen bonds (Table 2
, Figs. 1
and 7
). The two symmetry-equivalent hydrogen atoms associated with O3 connect the corresponding Na(H2O)4O2 octahedra with two directly adjacent heteropolyhedral layers (Fig. 7
). The range of distances between the relevant donors and acceptors is from 2.746 (2) to 2.913 (3) Å. Therefore, all hydrogen bonds can be classified as of medium strength (Steiner, 2002
).
|
|
| Figure 1 Single MoO4 tetrahedron in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 and the hydrogen bonds (dashed black lines) involving the corresponding oxygen atoms. Molybdenum, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in gray, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − y, x − y + 1, z; (ii) −x + y, 1 − x, z; (iii) x − y, x, 1 − z; (iv) x, y, 1 + z; (v) y, −x + y, 1 − z; (vi) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (vii) 1 − y, x − y + 1, 1 + z; (viii) x − y + 1, 1 + x, 1 − z; (ix) y, 1 − x + y, 1 − z; (x) −x + y, 1 − x, 1 + z; (xi) −x, 1 − y, 1 − z.] |
| Figure 2 Single Na(H2O)4O2 octahedron in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. Sodium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in yellow, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, −z + |
| Figure 3 Side view of a single Na3O2(H2O)9 group in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 formed by the condensation of three face-sharing octahedra. |
| Figure 4 Side view of a single decorated Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2 group in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 formed by the linkage to two MoO4 tetrahedra on both sides. [Symmetry codes: (i) y, −x + y, 1 − z; (ii) 1 − x, 1 − y, z + |
| Figure 5 Single K(H2O)6 prism in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. Potassium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in purple, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + y, −x, z; (ii) −y, x − y, z; (iii) −x + y, −x, −z + |
| Figure 6 Projection of a single heretopolyhedral layer at z = 3/4 in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 parallel to [001]. |
| | Figure 7 Projection of the whole crystal structure of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 parallel to [010]. Intra- and inter-layer hydrogen bonds are shown with black dashed lines. [Symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, −y, 1 − z.] |
2.2. NaK(MoO4)(H2O)
NaK(MoO4)(H2O) crystallizes in the non-centrosymmetric orthorhombic space group P212121 and comprises four formula units in the The MoO4 tetrahedron (Fig. 8
) shows Mo—O bond lengths between 1.754 (3) and 1.785 (3) Å (Table 3
) with distortion parameters of QE = 1.0024 and AV = 9.0515. The spread and average value of the Mo—O bonds are consistent with the literature data (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2020
). The sodium cations are coordinated by six ligands involving two water molecules and four oxygen atoms (Fig. 9
). The water molecules are located in a trans position. Bond lengths within the Na(H2O)2O4 unit range from 2.342 (3) to 2.453 (3) Å with distortion parameters of QE = 1.0129 and AV = 42.43. Adjacent octahedra share two trans edges to form chains running parallel [100] (Fig. 10
). The corners of neighbouring octahedra (O1, O3) are linked via MoO4 groups that assume a staggered configuration along the chain direction. The comparatively short O1–O3 edge of the attached rigid tetrahedra acts as a clamp that induces a cooperative rotation/distortion of the octahedra. Additional MoO4 tetrahedra are connected to one of the vertices of the edge that is common to adjacent octahedra inside the chain. Again, the units adopt a staggered configuration when viewed along [100]. The resulting chemical composition of the heteropolyhedral chains corresponds to Na(MoO4)2(H2O). Charge compensation is provided by potassium cations, which are incorporated in the voids between the chains. In more detail, each K+ ion is coordinated by eight next oxygen ligands including one water molecule (Fig. 11
). Up to 3.2 Å, the K—O bond lengths vary between 2.724 (3) and 3.198 (3) Å (average value: 2.897 Å). The <K—O> distance is in excellent agreement with the value of 2.894 Å reported by Gagné & Hawthorne (2016
) for K[8]. The hydrogen atoms of the water molecule O5W form single hydrogen bonds with the oxygen atoms O2 and O3, respectively (Fig. 8
, Table 4
). The O3⋯H52 interaction represents an intra-chain bond, whilst the corresponding O2⋯H51 hydrogen bond connects neighbouring heteropolyhedral chains. The donor–acceptor distances are indicative of hydrogen bonds of medium strength (Steiner, 2002
). A projection of the whole crystal structure of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) is presented in Fig. 12
.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Figure 8 Single MoO4 tetrahedron in NaK(MoO4)(H2O) and the hydrogen bonds (dashed black lines) involving the corresponding oxygen atoms. Molybdenum, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in gray, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 1 − y, z; (ii) x − |
| Figure 9 Single Na(H2O)2O4 octahedron in NaK(MoO4)(H2O). Sodium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in yellow, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + |
| | Figure 10 Side view of a heteropolyhedral Na(MoO4)2(H2O) chain in NaK(MoO4)(H2O). |
| Figure 11 Single coordination polyhedron for potassium in NaK(MoO4)(H2O). Potassium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in purple, red and white, respectively. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + |
| Figure 12 Projection of the whole crystal structure of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) parallel to [100]. Intra- and inter-chain hydrogen bonds are shown with black dashed lines. [Symmetry code: (i) -x + |
2.3. Bond-valence sums
For both alkali molybdate hydrates, calculations of bond-valence sums (BVS) in valence units (v.u.) were performed using the parameter sets for Mo—O, Na—O and K—O listed by Brown & Altermatt (1985
) to verify the correctness of the structure models. The BVS values for all atomic sites are summarized in Tables 5
and 6
. The calculations were performed both with and without the contributions of the hydrogen atoms of the water molecules. Following the suggestion of Hawthorne (1997
), the effect of the hydrogen atoms has been taken into consideration by attributing 0.8 v.u. to the donor oxygen atom and 0.2 v.u. to the acceptor oxygen of the hydrogen bond. The results generally compare well with the expected values of 1.00 v.u. for K, 6.00 for Mo and 2.00 v.u. for O. However, it is noteworthy, that the sodium cations show slightly larger deviations from 1.00 v.u. (BVS values of 1.22 v.u.), indicating an overbonding; that is, the octahedral voids occupied by this type of alkali cation are slightly too small.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.4. Thermal expansion
Unfortunately, the crystals of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 were not stable at ambient conditions for more than a couple of hours. Therefore, it was decided to determine the tensor only for NaK(MoO4)(H2O). For the data collection at 193 K, the crystal was mounted on a LithoLoop (Molecular Dimensions) using a drop of Paratone-N oil (Hampton Research) and immersed in a cold air stream generated by an Oxford Cryosystems Desktop Cooler. The very same sample was then affixed to the tip of a glass fibre with fingernail hardener, in order to obtain data at 296 K. As the refined structural parameters of the room-temperature investigation are essentially identical to those of the low-temperature study, they will not be reported in detail. Instead, the focus will be on determining the thermal expansion tensor from the two sets of lattice parameters. Please refer to Table 7
for the respective values for 193 K. The corresponding values at ambient temperature are as follows: a = 6.4859 (7) Å, b = 8.1025 (8) Å, and c = 10.1835 (12) Å. The average tensor αij for a given temperature interval, ΔT, can be calculated from the thermal strain tensor ɛij and the relationship αij = ɛij/ΔT. Due to the orthorhombic symmetry restrictions, the off-diagonal terms of the symmetric second-rank tensor αij with i ≠ j must be strictly zero. The remaining three components can be obtained from the following expressions: ɛ11 = (a/a0) −1, ɛ22 = (b/b0) −1 and ɛ33 = (c/c0) −1. Notably, the lattice parameters with the suffix ‘zero' pertain to the low-temperature data. In consequence, the off-diagonal components have the following values: α11 = 11 (1) × 10−6, α22 = 39 (1) × 10−6, and α33 = 42 (1) × 10−6. From the comparison of the numerical values it is obvious that the thermal expansion shows a pronounced anisotropy. The expansion along [100], that is, along the rigid chain-like building blocks of the crystal structure, is about a factor four smaller than along [010] and [001], respectively. Notably, α22 and α33 are equal within two standard deviations. By plotting the values of the tensor as a function of all directions one obtains a convenient geometric representation of the anisotropic behaviour of the tensor in the form of a surface in three-dimensional space (Fig. 13
).
|
| Figure 13 Three-dimensional representation surface of the average thermal expansion tensor of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) in the interval between 193 and 296 K. |
3. Database survey
As mentioned above, Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 is isotypic with the corresponding rubidium compound (Klevtsova et al., 1990
). For the calculation of several quantitative descriptors for the characterization of the degree of similarity, the program COMPSTRU (de la Flor et al., 2016
) was employed. After a transformation according to a′ = –b, b′ = –a, and c′ = –c the structure of Na3Rb(MoO4)2(H2O)9 was transformed to the most similar configuration of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. The calculations revealed the following displacements (in Å) between the corresponding atom pairs in both phases: Mo: 0.011; Na: 0.034; K: 0.000; O1: 0.011; O2: 0.040; O3: 0.063; O4: 0.124. The measure of similarity (Δ) as defined by Bergerhoff et al. (1999
) has a value of 0.030. Notably, the most pronounced shifts occur between the oxygen atoms of the water molecules surrounding the potassium cations. The degree of lattice distortion S is related to the spontaneous strain that can be obtained from a comparison of the unit-cell parameters of both phases. In more detail, it is the square root of the sum of the squared eigenvalues of the strain tensor divided by 3. For the given two structure descriptions, S has a value of 0.0075. To the best of the author's knowledge, the presence of the Na3O2(H2O)9 or more generally, M3φ11 units built on three octahedra sharing two faces, is rather an exception. According to Pauling's third rule (Pauling, 1929
), shared faces between coordination polyhedra dramatically decreases the stability of a crystal structure. It is noteworthy, that one of the cesium suboxides contains equivalent anion-centred units with composition O3Cs11 (Simon et al., 1978
).
NaK(MoO4)(H2O) represents a new structure type. Nevertheless, its characteristic [6]M(TO4)2φ chains (φ: H2O, OH, F) have been already observed in a number of phosphate-, arsenate- and vanadate-based minerals including wherryite [Pb7Cu2(SO4)4(SiO4)2(OH)2; Cooper & Hawthorne, 1994
] and brackebuschite [Pb2(Mn3+,Fe3+)(VO4)2(OH); Foley et al., 1997
], for example. Further representatives can be found in the review publications of Hawthorne (1998
) and Lussier & Hawthorne (2021
) on decorated and undecorated chains of edge-sharing octahedra. The present phase is the first pure molybdate member of this group of compounds. Further examples of low-hydrated mixed alkali hydrates containing sodium include NaLi(MoO4)(H2O)2 (Makitova et al., 1990
) and NaCs(MoO4)(H2O)2 (Klevtsov et al., 1997
). However, these two materials are structurally not related to the present compound. The first phase is composed of units of two Na(H2O)2O4 octahedra and two Li(H2O)2O3 tetragonal pyramids sharing common edges, which are linked by MoO4 tetrahedra. The structural backbones of the latter compound comprise chains of face-sharing Na(H2O)4O2 octahedra, which are decorated with MoO4 tetrahedra. Only very recently, chemically related Na2(MoO4)(H2O)2, a synthetic compound with some relevance in industrial inorganic chemistry, has also been found in nature in a fumarole deposit of the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. The new mineral was named natromolybdite (Pekov et al., 2025
). It is possible, that a natural equivalent of synthetic NaK(MoO4)(H2O) can be found in similar petrographic environments. According to the present investigation, NaK(MoO4)(H2O) exhibits high solubility in water and crystallizes readily. This may provide an opportunity for the targeted growth of larger crystals of this acentric phase, which could be further studied for potential applications in nonlinear optics, for example.
4. Synthesis and crystallization
The two compounds were obtained as by-products in crystal growth experiments aimed at synthesizing silicates from the quaternary Na2O–K2O–CaO–SiO2 system. A total of 0.5 g of the nutrient, composed of Na2O:K2O:CaO:SiO2 in a molar ratio of 1:1:6:12, was thoroughly homogenized in an agate mortar with 2.5 g of a Na2MoO4–K2MoO4 fluxing agent (molar ratio 1:1). The sample was then heated in a covered platinum crucible from room temperature to 1373 K at a heating rate of 2 K min−1. Following a three-day holding period at the maximum temperature, the sample was cooled to 1023 K at a rate of 0.1 K min−1. The crucible was then removed and quenched in air to ambient conditions. Following mechanical removal of the melt cake, the silicate phases were separated by dissolving the flux in distilled water on a watch glass at 295 K and 43% relative humidity (RH). New crystals were formed spontaneously in the remaining solution, which had been saturated with alkali molybdates, through slow evaporation of the solvent over the course of several hours. The presence of two distinct birefringent phases was indicated by differences in morphology (laths, plates). This was subsequently confirmed by single-crystal diffraction experiments. Following exposure to air (295 K, 43% RH) for a period of several hours, the initially transparent lath-shaped crystals of phase 1 [Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9] exhibited a transition in colour to an opaque hue, suggesting a gradual deterioration due to an ongoing dehydration process.
5. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 7
. To prevent possible water release, data acquisitions were performed at 193 K. Unconstrained site-population refinements of the K/Na populations on the relevant sites under the assumption of full occupancy did not show any indications for cation substitutions between the alkali atoms and, therefore, the non-tetrahedral cation positions were occupied with either Na or K, respectively. Difference-Fourier calculations were employed to reveal the positions of the hydrogen atoms. This procedure allowed the location of the hydrogen atoms of all water sites in the asymmetric units of both phases. The positional parameters of the H-atoms were further optimized by a riding model with water-molecule geometries restrained by DFIX 0.86 0.01 commands for the O—H and DFIX 1.35 0.02 commands for the H⋯H distances (giving H—O—H angles close to 105°). The isotropic displacement parameters for the H atoms of the water molecules were coupled to those of the corresponding oxygen atoms according to Uiso(H) = 1.2×Ueq(O). The Flack parameter of acentric NaK(MoO4)(H2O) indicates that the absolute structure has been determined correctly (Table 7
).
Supporting information
contains datablocks global, Na3KMoO42H2O9, NaKMoO4H2O. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026004779/wm5795sup1.cif
| Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 | Dx = 2.054 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 590.09 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hexagonal, P63/m | Cell parameters from 2517 reflections |
| Hall symbol: -P 6c | θ = 4.9–29.7° |
| a = 9.4974 (11) Å | µ = 1.67 mm−1 |
| c = 12.2139 (14) Å | T = 193 K |
| V = 954.10 (19) Å3 | Lath-shaped fragment, colourless |
| Z = 2 | 0.43 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm |
| F(000) = 580 |
| Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra diffractometer | 800 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source | 697 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.046 |
| Detector resolution: 10.3575 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 3.3° |
| ω scans | h = −12→12 |
| Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlisPro (Rigaku OD, 2020). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995)] | k = −11→12 |
| Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.995 | l = −16→15 |
| 7218 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
| wR(F2) = 0.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0297P)2 + 0.6304P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| S = 1.09 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| 800 reflections | Δρmax = 1.16 e Å−3 |
| 49 parameters | Δρmin = −0.64 e Å−3 |
| 5 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
| Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0051 (10) |
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Mo | 0.33333 | 0.66667 | 0.97769 (2) | 0.01574 (14) | |
| Na | 0.16850 (16) | 0.45384 (16) | 0.25 | 0.0222 (3) | |
| K | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.0362 (3) | |
| O1 | 0.33333 | 0.66667 | 0.1213 (2) | 0.0190 (6) | |
| O2 | 0.1881 (2) | 0.4711 (2) | 0.93025 (14) | 0.0260 (4) | |
| O3W | 0.4008 (3) | 0.4183 (3) | 0.25 | 0.0275 (5) | |
| H3 | 0.428 (3) | 0.383 (3) | 0.1942 (4) | 0.033* | |
| O4W | 0.0281 (2) | 0.2565 (2) | 0.11551 (15) | 0.0320 (4) | |
| H41 | −0.0704 (15) | 0.236 (4) | 0.110 (2) | 0.038* | |
| H42 | 0.074 (3) | 0.307 (4) | 0.0563 (16) | 0.038* |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Mo | 0.01825 (16) | 0.01825 (16) | 0.0107 (2) | 0.00912 (8) | 0 | 0 |
| Na | 0.0222 (7) | 0.0200 (6) | 0.0219 (6) | 0.0086 (5) | 0 | 0 |
| K | 0.0325 (5) | 0.0325 (5) | 0.0438 (8) | 0.0162 (2) | 0 | 0 |
| O1 | 0.0210 (9) | 0.0210 (9) | 0.0152 (13) | 0.0105 (4) | 0 | 0 |
| O2 | 0.0277 (9) | 0.0240 (9) | 0.0233 (9) | 0.0106 (7) | −0.0061 (7) | −0.0050 (7) |
| O3W | 0.0396 (15) | 0.0378 (14) | 0.0172 (11) | 0.0283 (13) | 0 | 0 |
| O4W | 0.0249 (9) | 0.0384 (11) | 0.0281 (9) | 0.0125 (9) | −0.0010 (8) | −0.0002 (8) |
| Mo—O1i | 1.753 (3) | Na—O1 | 2.418 (2) |
| Mo—O2ii | 1.7683 (16) | Na—O3Wv | 2.437 (3) |
| Mo—O2 | 1.7683 (16) | K—O4Wvi | 2.8381 (19) |
| Mo—O2iii | 1.7683 (16) | K—O4Wiv | 2.8381 (19) |
| Na—O4W | 2.343 (2) | K—O4Wvii | 2.8381 (19) |
| Na—O4Wiv | 2.343 (2) | K—O4Wviii | 2.8381 (19) |
| Na—O3W | 2.392 (3) | K—O4W | 2.8381 (19) |
| Na—O1v | 2.418 (2) | K—O4Wix | 2.8381 (19) |
| O1i—Mo—O2ii | 109.13 (6) | O3W—Na—O3Wv | 157.63 (10) |
| O1i—Mo—O2 | 109.13 (6) | O1v—Na—O3Wv | 81.06 (6) |
| O2ii—Mo—O2 | 109.81 (6) | O1—Na—O3Wv | 81.06 (6) |
| O1i—Mo—O2iii | 109.13 (6) | O4Wvi—K—O4Wiv | 131.88 (2) |
| O2ii—Mo—O2iii | 109.81 (6) | O4Wvi—K—O4Wvii | 70.73 (8) |
| O2—Mo—O2iii | 109.81 (6) | O4Wiv—K—O4Wvii | 89.86 (6) |
| O4W—Na—O4Wiv | 89.02 (10) | O4Wvi—K—O4Wviii | 131.88 (2) |
| O4W—Na—O3W | 94.79 (8) | O4Wiv—K—O4Wviii | 89.86 (6) |
| O4Wiv—Na—O3W | 94.79 (8) | O4Wvii—K—O4Wviii | 89.86 (6) |
| O4W—Na—O1v | 175.15 (8) | O4Wvi—K—O4W | 89.86 (5) |
| O4Wiv—Na—O1v | 94.84 (7) | O4Wiv—K—O4W | 70.73 (8) |
| O3W—Na—O1v | 81.99 (6) | O4Wvii—K—O4W | 131.88 (2) |
| O4W—Na—O1 | 94.84 (7) | O4Wviii—K—O4W | 131.88 (2) |
| O4Wiv—Na—O1 | 175.15 (8) | O4Wvi—K—O4Wix | 89.85 (5) |
| O3W—Na—O1 | 81.99 (6) | O4Wiv—K—O4Wix | 131.88 (2) |
| O1v—Na—O1 | 81.15 (11) | O4Wvii—K—O4Wix | 131.88 (2) |
| O4W—Na—O3Wv | 101.09 (8) | O4Wviii—K—O4Wix | 70.73 (8) |
| O4Wiv—Na—O3Wv | 101.09 (8) | O4W—K—O4Wix | 89.86 (6) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) −x+y, −x+1, z; (iii) −y+1, x−y+1, z; (iv) x, y, −z+1/2; (v) −x+y, −x+1, −z+1/2; (vi) −y, x−y, z; (vii) −y, x−y, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+y, −x, −z+1/2; (ix) −x+y, −x, z. |
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| O3W—H3···O2x | 0.85 (1) | 1.94 (1) | 2.793 (2) | 174 (3) |
| O4W—H41···O2xi | 0.86 (1) | 1.90 (1) | 2.746 (2) | 169 (3) |
| O4W—H42···O2xii | 0.86 (1) | 2.07 (1) | 2.913 (3) | 168 (3) |
| Symmetry codes: (x) y, −x+y, −z+1; (xi) x−y, x, −z+1; (xii) x, y, z−1. |
| NaK(MoO4)(H2O) | F(000) = 456 |
| Mr = 240.04 | Dx = 3.008 Mg m−3 |
| Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 1970 reflections |
| a = 6.4781 (8) Å | θ = 5.6–29.5° |
| b = 8.0697 (10) Å | µ = 3.27 mm−1 |
| c = 10.1399 (13) Å | T = 193 K |
| V = 530.08 (11) Å3 | Irregular fragment, colourless |
| Z = 4 | 0.18 × 0.14 × 0.06 mm |
| Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra diffractometer | 1249 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source | 1208 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.039 |
| Detector resolution: 10.3575 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 3.7° |
| ω scans | h = −8→8 |
| Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlisPro (Rigaku OD, 2020). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995)] | k = −10→10 |
| Tmin = 0.738, Tmax = 0.869 | l = −13→13 |
| 3887 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
| wR(F2) = 0.058 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0269P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| 1249 reflections | Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 |
| 79 parameters | Δρmin = −0.87 e Å−3 |
| 3 restraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983) |
| Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: −0.01 (7) |
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Mo | 0.51460 (5) | 0.11176 (3) | 0.30697 (3) | 0.00784 (10) | |
| Na | 0.7761 (2) | 0.7544 (2) | 0.48190 (14) | 0.0127 (3) | |
| K | 0.49819 (15) | 0.13919 (9) | 0.65476 (8) | 0.01524 (18) | |
| O1 | 0.7135 (4) | 0.1024 (4) | 0.1899 (2) | 0.0156 (6) | |
| O2 | 0.5594 (5) | 0.2846 (3) | 0.4081 (2) | 0.0181 (7) | |
| O3 | 0.7634 (5) | 0.3755 (4) | 0.7646 (2) | 0.0136 (6) | |
| O4 | 0.5160 (5) | 0.9389 (3) | 0.4140 (2) | 0.0140 (5) | |
| O5W | 0.4645 (5) | 0.0528 (3) | 0.9335 (2) | 0.0131 (6) | |
| H51 | 0.500 (6) | −0.022 (3) | 0.987 (3) | 0.016* | |
| H52 | 0.376 (5) | 0.009 (4) | 0.883 (3) | 0.016* |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Mo | 0.00733 (15) | 0.00843 (15) | 0.00776 (16) | −0.00002 (14) | 0.00045 (13) | 0.00036 (10) |
| Na | 0.0095 (8) | 0.0153 (7) | 0.0133 (7) | −0.0015 (6) | −0.0009 (6) | −0.0002 (7) |
| K | 0.0175 (4) | 0.0158 (3) | 0.0124 (4) | −0.0007 (4) | −0.0005 (4) | 0.0013 (3) |
| O1 | 0.0144 (13) | 0.0201 (15) | 0.0122 (12) | 0.0029 (13) | 0.0035 (11) | 0.0066 (15) |
| O2 | 0.0266 (19) | 0.0115 (12) | 0.0163 (13) | −0.0028 (12) | −0.0006 (13) | −0.0030 (11) |
| O3 | 0.0114 (14) | 0.0158 (15) | 0.0137 (13) | −0.0025 (12) | 0.0026 (10) | 0.0014 (13) |
| O4 | 0.0150 (15) | 0.0122 (11) | 0.0149 (11) | −0.0003 (13) | 0.0007 (13) | 0.0056 (10) |
| O5W | 0.0136 (15) | 0.0134 (12) | 0.0121 (12) | −0.0022 (12) | −0.0044 (11) | 0.0016 (10) |
| Mo—O1 | 1.754 (3) | Na—O3iii | 2.453 (3) |
| Mo—O2 | 1.755 (3) | K—O1vii | 2.724 (3) |
| Mo—O4i | 1.767 (2) | K—O2 | 2.791 (3) |
| Mo—O3ii | 1.785 (3) | K—O3 | 2.798 (3) |
| Na—O5Wiii | 2.342 (3) | K—O3viii | 2.840 (3) |
| Na—O4 | 2.352 (3) | K—O5W | 2.919 (3) |
| Na—O1iv | 2.406 (3) | K—O4i | 2.930 (3) |
| Na—O5Wv | 2.411 (3) | K—O2ii | 2.978 (3) |
| Na—O4vi | 2.442 (3) | K—O1ii | 3.198 (3) |
| O1—Mo—O2 | 107.95 (14) | O2—K—O3viii | 131.11 (8) |
| O1—Mo—O4i | 112.21 (13) | O3—K—O3viii | 139.67 (4) |
| O2—Mo—O4i | 105.53 (12) | O1vii—K—O5W | 75.74 (8) |
| O1—Mo—O3ii | 113.38 (12) | O2—K—O5W | 168.15 (8) |
| O2—Mo—O3ii | 110.03 (14) | O3—K—O5W | 79.82 (8) |
| O4i—Mo—O3ii | 107.46 (14) | O3viii—K—O5W | 59.86 (7) |
| O5Wiii—Na—O4 | 91.84 (12) | O1vii—K—O4i | 71.77 (8) |
| O5Wiii—Na—O1iv | 81.07 (10) | O2—K—O4i | 58.63 (8) |
| O4—Na—O1iv | 88.45 (11) | O3—K—O4i | 133.12 (9) |
| O5Wiii—Na—O5Wv | 170.65 (10) | O3viii—K—O4i | 81.38 (8) |
| O4—Na—O5Wv | 93.93 (11) | O5W—K—O4i | 132.68 (7) |
| O1iv—Na—O5Wv | 91.72 (10) | O1vii—K—O2ii | 146.17 (9) |
| O5Wiii—Na—O4vi | 93.35 (11) | O2—K—O2ii | 81.77 (7) |
| O4—Na—O4vi | 170.77 (10) | O3—K—O2ii | 122.05 (8) |
| O1iv—Na—O4vi | 84.82 (10) | O3viii—K—O2ii | 69.32 (8) |
| O5Wv—Na—O4vi | 80.00 (11) | O5W—K—O2ii | 100.67 (8) |
| O5Wiii—Na—O3iii | 99.81 (10) | O4i—K—O2ii | 88.47 (8) |
| O4—Na—O3iii | 86.15 (10) | O1vii—K—O1ii | 142.92 (4) |
| O1iv—Na—O3iii | 174.55 (13) | O2—K—O1ii | 104.43 (8) |
| O5Wv—Na—O3iii | 87.93 (10) | O3—K—O1ii | 73.36 (8) |
| O4vi—Na—O3iii | 100.47 (11) | O3viii—K—O1ii | 90.15 (9) |
| O1vii—K—O2 | 108.71 (9) | O5W—K—O1ii | 68.64 (8) |
| O1vii—K—O3 | 90.85 (10) | O4i—K—O1ii | 142.43 (8) |
| O2—K—O3 | 89.04 (8) | O2ii—K—O1ii | 54.56 (7) |
| O1vii—K—O3viii | 80.51 (9) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+3/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (iv) −x+3/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (v) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (vi) x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (vii) −x+3/2, −y, z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2. |
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| O5W—H51···O2viii | 0.85 (1) | 1.93 (2) | 2.700 (4) | 151 (4) |
| O5W—H52···O3viii | 0.85 (1) | 2.05 (2) | 2.874 (4) | 163 (4) |
| Symmetry code: (viii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2. |
| The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O···H contributions are taken into consideration (see text). |
| Mo | Na | K | Sum | |
| O1 | 1.516 | 0.190×2↓×3→ | 2.087 | |
| O2 | 1.456×3↓×1→ | 1.456 (2.056) | ||
| O3 | 0.203 ; 0.180 | 0.383 (1.983) | ||
| O4 | 0.232×2↓×1→ | 0.148×6↓×1→ | 0.380 (1.981) | |
| Sum | 5.884 | 1.227 | 0.890 |
| The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O···H contributions are taken into consideration (see text). |
| Mo | Na | K | Sum | |
| O1 | 1.512 | 0.196 | 0.202 ; 0.056 | 1.966 |
| O2 | 1.508 | 0.168 ; 0.102 | 1.778 (1.978) | |
| O3 | 1.391 | 0.173 | 0.165 ; 0.148 | 1.877 (2.077) |
| O4 | 1.450 | 0.227 ; 0.178 | 0.116 | 1.980 |
| O5 | 0.233 ; 0.193 | 0.119 | 0.545 (2.146) | |
| Sum | 5.871 | 1.200 | 1.076 |
References
Bergerhoff, G., Berndt, M., Brandenburg, K. & Degen, T. (1999). Acta Cryst. B55, 147–156. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Cooper, M. & Hawthorne, F. C. (1994). Can. Mineral. 32, 373–380. CAS Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653–664. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Foley, J. A., Hughes, J. M. & Lange, D. (1997). Can. Mineral. 35, 1027–1033. CAS Google Scholar
Gagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 602–625. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2020). IUCrJ 7, 581–629. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F. C. (1997). Modular Aspects of Minerals edited by S. Merlino, pp. 373–429. Budapest: Eötvös University Press. Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F. C. (1998). Miner. Mag. 62, 141–164. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Klevtsova, R. F., Glinskaya, L. A., Perepelitsa, A. P., Ishchenko, V. N. & Klevtsov, P. V. (1990). Kristallografiya 35, 1094–1098. CAS Google Scholar
Klevtsov, P. V., Glinskaya, L. A., Klevtsova, R. F. & Aleksandrov, K. F. (1997). J. Struct. Chem. 38, 615–619. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S. V. (2009). Structural Crystallography of Inorganic Oxysalts. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Lussier, A. J. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2021). Can. Mineral. 59, 9–30. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Makitova, D. D., Tkachev, V. V. & Atovmyan, L. O. (1990). Koord. Khim. 16, 616–618. CAS Google Scholar
Milošev, I. (2024). Corros. Sci. 229, 111854. Google Scholar
Mirzoev, R. S., Karov, Z. G., Kyarov, A. A. & Shetov, R. A. (2007). Izv. Vuzov. Sev.-Kavk. Region. Estestv. Nauki 4, 60–62. Google Scholar
Mirzoev, R. S., Shetov, R. A., Ligidov, M. Kh. & El'mesova, R. M. (2010). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 55, 96–102. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
O'Neil, M. J. (2013). The Merck Index 15th ed., Royal Society of Chemistry. Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1929). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 1010–1026. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pekov, I. V., Britvin, S. N., Koshlyakova, N. N., Agakhanov, A. A., Belakovskiy, D. I., Chukanov, N. V., Ksenofontov, D. A., Turchkova, A. G. & Zhegunov, P. S. (2025). Mineral. Mag. 89, 700–705. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rigaku OD (2020). Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Robinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science 172, 567–570. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Simon, A., Braemer, W. & Deiseroth, H.-J. (1978). Inorg. Chem. 17, 875–879. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Steiner, T. (2002). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 48–76. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vukasovich, M. S. & Farr, J. P. G. (1986). Polyhedron 5, 551–559. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



