research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Crystal structures of two hydrous sodium potassium molybdates: Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 and NaK(MoO4)(H2O)

crossmark logo

aUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Mineralogy & Petrography, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 3 April 2026; accepted 7 May 2026; online 12 May 2026)

Single-crystals of the hydrated sodium potassium orthomolybdate phases Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9, tris­odium potassium bis­(orthomolybdate) nona­hydrate, and NaK(MoO4)(H2O), sodium potassium orthomolybdate monohydrate, were obtained as by-products in a flux growth experiment aiming on the synthesis of silicates from the quaternary system Na2O–K2O–CaO–SiO2. The asymmetric unit of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 (space group P63/m, Z = 2) comprises one Na+ atom and one water mol­ecule on a mirror plane, one K+ atom on a 6 axis, one Mo6+ cation and one O atom on a threefold rotation axis, and one O atom and one water mol­ecule in general sites. The crystal structure is built from isolated MoO4 tetra­hedra, which are linked by common corners to trimers containing three face-sharing Na(H2O)4O2 octa­hedra. Linkage between the heteropolyhedral groups is provided by potassium cations, which are coordinated by six water mol­ecules in form of trigonal prisms. The resulting layers are located at z = 1/4 and z = 3/4, respectively. Intra- and inter-layer hydrogen bonds between the water mol­ecules and the oxygen atoms of the MoO4 tetra­hedra consolidate the structure. The backbone of the crystal structure of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) (space group P212121, Z = 4) is made from chains of edge-sharing Na(H2O)2O4 octa­hedra running parallel [100], which are decorated by MoO4 tetra­hedra via corner sharing. Neighbouring heteropolyhedral chains are linked by additional potassium cations, which are coordinated by seven oxygen ligands and one water mol­ecule. Moreover, intra- and inter-chain hydrogen bonds exist.

1. Chemical context

Oxidomolybdates offer the crystallographer a rich playground for structural investigations. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that the Mo atoms have the capacity to form covalent bonds with four, five or six oxygen atoms. The sharing of common oxygen atoms between the respective polyhedra facilitates the formation of larger negatively charged polyanions, including isolated groups, chains, and ultimately, three-dimensional frameworks (Krivovichev, 2009View full citation). Consequently, it is not unexpected that a multitude of molybdate structures have been documented in the present literature. If water mol­ecules are allowed to become incorporated, a further increase in the number of crystalline phases will be observed. In the event that the charge-compensating cations are restricted to group 1 elements, the current web version (5.5.0) of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD; Zagorac et al., 2019View full citation) contains a total of 153 entries of anhydrous plus another 41 entries of hydrous phases. Hydrous alkali molybdates have also some industrial applications. For example, sodium molybdate dihydrate is used in corrosion science to protect metal surfaces, as it is a non-oxidizing anodic inhibitor (Vukasovich & Farr, 1986View full citation; Milošev, 2024View full citation). It is also used as a micronutrient to remedy problems in crops due to low molybdenum concentration in soils (O'Neil, 2013View full citation).

To the best of the author's knowledge, only a few systematic investigations on the system Na2MoO4 – K2MoO4 – H2O have been performed so far. Mirzoev et al. (2007View full citation, 2010View full citation) studied the phase relations at 298 and 323 K and observed the following compounds: Na2(MoO4)(H2O)2, Na3K(MoO4)2, K2(MoO4) and Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. It was not possible to obtain the nona­hydrate during the crystallization experiments conducted at 323 K. The latter compound was already mentioned in an earlier publication by Klevtsova et al. (1990View full citation), even though no detailed information on the synthesis conditions were given. Notably, no further hydrous mixed sodium potassium molybdate was found. As (i) the crystal structure of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 has not been reported or deposited in databases such as the ICSD, and (ii) the existence of a previously unknown phase with composition NaK(MoO4)(H2O) was observed in our experiments, a decision was taken to investigate both compounds using single-crystal X-ray diffraction in more detail.

2. Structural commentary

2.1. Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9

Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 is isostructural with Na3Rb(MoO4)2(H2O)9 (ICSD-entry no. 39293, based on the data published by Klevtsova et al., 1990View full citation) and Na3K(WO4)2(H2O)9 (ICSD-entry no. 39294; Klevtsova et al., 1990View full citation). The compound crystallizes in the hexa­gonal space group P63/m. The unit cell contains two formula units. The structure comprises insular MoO4 tetra­hedra (Fig. 1[link]) occupying the Wyckoff-position 4f (site symmetry 3..). The Mo—O bond lengths range from 1.753 (3) to 1.768 (2) Å (Table 1[link]). The distances between the Mo atoms and the three basal O2 atoms are slightly larger than the corresponding bond lengths to the apical O1 atom. The average value <Mo—O> = 1.764 Å is in perfect agreement with the value reported by Gagné & Hawthorne (2020View full citation) for hexa­valent Mo[4] obtained from a bond-length dispersion analysis of more than 1700 individual bonds. The six O—Mo—O angles have values that are very close to the ideal tetra­hedral angle of 109.5°. The degree of tetra­hedral distortion can be qu­anti­fied using the following two parameters: quadratic elongation (QE) and angle variance (AV) (Robinson et al., 1971View full citation). The numerical values for these parameters reflect the very low degree of distortion: QE = 1.000 and AV = 0.14. The sodium cations are located on mirror planes perpendicular to [001] (Wyckoff-position 6h) and are octa­hedrally coordinated by four water mol­ecules and two oxygen atoms belonging to two symmetry-equivalent MoO4 units (Fig. 2[link]). Three adjacent octa­hedra form a Na3O2(H2O)9 group, in which two faces of each octa­hedron are shared by the other two octa­hedra belonging to the same trimer (Fig. 3[link]). The faces are defined by two O1 atoms and one O3W mol­ecule. Notably, the O1–O1 edge is a common element of all three faces. The barycentres of the group (site symmetry Mathematical equation), located at the midpoint of the central O1–O1 edge, have the fractional coordinates of 1/3 2/3 1/4 and 2/3 1/3 3/4, respectively. As may be anti­cipated, the bonds between Na and the two terminal (unshared) O4W oxygen atoms of the Na(H2O)4O2 octa­hedra are significantly shorter [2.343 (2) Å] than the corresponding bond lengths to the bridging O atoms of the group (average value = 2.416 Å). The corresponding distortion parameters have values of QE = 1.018 and AV = 64.18. The trimers are decorated by MoO4 tetra­hedra on both sides sharing a common oxygen atom O1, which implies that the tetra­hedra point in opposite directions (Fig. 4[link]). The resulting heteropolyhedral unit has the composition Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2. The potassium cations (Wyckoff-position 2a) are coordinated by six water mol­ecules (Fig. 5[link]). The coordination polyhedron corresponds to a trigonal prism with site symmetry Mathematical equation. A single K(H2O)6 prism shares three O4W–O4W edges with Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2 groups that are directly adjacent. Consequently, mixed-polyhedral layers are formed at z = 1/4 and z = 3/4 that are parallel to (001) (Fig. 6[link]). Further linkage between the polyhedra is facilitated by hydrogen bonding. A projection of the whole structure parallel to [010] is shown in Fig. 7[link]. Indeed, each of the three basal oxygen atoms (O2) of the tetra­hedra are acceptors of one inter-layer (O2⋯H42) and two intra-layer (O2⋯H41, O2⋯H3) hydrogen bonds (Table 2[link], Figs. 1[link] and 7[link]). The two symmetry-equivalent hydrogen atoms associated with O3 connect the corresponding Na(H2O)4O2 octa­hedra with two directly adjacent heteropolyhedral layers (Fig. 7[link]). The range of distances between the relevant donors and acceptors is from 2.746 (2) to 2.913 (3) Å. Therefore, all hydrogen bonds can be classified as of medium strength (Steiner, 2002View full citation).

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9

Mo—O1i 1.753 (3) Na—O1 2.418 (2)
Mo—O2ii 1.7683 (16) Na—O3Wv 2.437 (3)
Mo—O2 1.7683 (16) K—O4Wvi 2.8381 (19)
Mo—O2iii 1.7683 (16) K—O4Wiv 2.8381 (19)
Na—O4W 2.343 (2) K—O4Wvii 2.8381 (19)
Na—O4Wiv 2.343 (2) K—O4Wviii 2.8381 (19)
Na—O3W 2.392 (3) K—O4W 2.8381 (19)
Na—O1v 2.418 (2) K—O4Wix 2.8381 (19)
       
O1i—Mo—O2ii 109.13 (6) O3W—Na—O3Wv 157.63 (10)
O1i—Mo—O2 109.13 (6) O1v—Na—O3Wv 81.06 (6)
O2ii—Mo—O2 109.81 (6) O1—Na—O3Wv 81.06 (6)
O1i—Mo—O2iii 109.13 (6) O4Wvi—K—O4Wiv 131.88 (2)
O2ii—Mo—O2iii 109.81 (6) O4Wvi—K—O4Wvii 70.73 (8)
O2—Mo—O2iii 109.81 (6) O4Wiv—K—O4Wvii 89.86 (6)
O4W—Na—O4Wiv 89.02 (10) O4Wvi—K—O4Wviii 131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O3W 94.79 (8) O4Wiv—K—O4Wviii 89.86 (6)
O4Wiv—Na—O3W 94.79 (8) O4Wvii—K—O4Wviii 89.86 (6)
O4W—Na—O1v 175.15 (8) O4Wvi—K—O4W 89.86 (5)
O4Wiv—Na—O1v 94.84 (7) O4Wiv—K—O4W 70.73 (8)
O3W—Na—O1v 81.99 (6) O4Wvii—K—O4W 131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O1 94.84 (7) O4Wviii—K—O4W 131.88 (2)
O4Wiv—Na—O1 175.15 (8) O4Wvi—K—O4Wix 89.85 (5)
O3W—Na—O1 81.99 (6) O4Wiv—K—O4Wix 131.88 (2)
O1v—Na—O1 81.15 (11) O4Wvii—K—O4Wix 131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O3Wv 101.09 (8) O4Wviii—K—O4Wix 70.73 (8)
O4Wiv—Na—O3Wv 101.09 (8) O4W—K—O4Wix 89.86 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation; (vi) Mathematical equation; (vii) Mathematical equation; (viii) Mathematical equation; (ix) Mathematical equation.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3W—H3⋯O2x 0.85 (1) 1.94 (1) 2.793 (2) 174 (3)
O4W—H41⋯O2xi 0.86 (1) 1.90 (1) 2.746 (2) 169 (3)
O4W—H42⋯O2xii 0.86 (1) 2.07 (1) 2.913 (3) 168 (3)
Symmetry codes: (x) Mathematical equation; (xi) Mathematical equation; (xii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Single MoO4 tetra­hedron in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 and the hydrogen bonds (dashed black lines) involving the corresponding oxygen atoms. Molybdenum, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in gray, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − y, x − y + 1, z; (ii) −x + y, 1 − x, z; (iii) x − y, x, 1 − z; (iv) x, y, 1 + z; (v) y, −x + y, 1 − z; (vi) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (vii) 1 − y, x − y + 1, 1 + z; (viii) x − y + 1, 1 + x, 1 − z; (ix) y, 1 − x + y, 1 − z; (x) −x + y, 1 − x, 1 + z; (xi) −x, 1 − y, 1 − z.]
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Single Na(H2O)4O2 octa­hedron in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. Sodium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in yellow, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, −z + Mathematical equation; (ii) −x + y, 1 − x, z.]
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Side view of a single Na3O2(H2O)9 group in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 formed by the condensation of three face-sharing octa­hedra.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Side view of a single decorated Na3(H2O)9(MoO4)2 group in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 formed by the linkage to two MoO4 tetra­hedra on both sides. [Symmetry codes: (i) y, −x + y, 1 − z; (ii) 1 − x, 1 − y, z + Mathematical equation; (iii) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.]
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Single K(H2O)6 prism in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. Potassium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in purple, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + y, −x, z; (ii) −y, x − y, z; (iii) −x + y, −x, −z + Mathematical equation; (iv) x, y, −z + Mathematical equation; (v) −y, x − y, −z + Mathematical equation.]
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Projection of a single heretopolyhedral layer at z = 3/4 in Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 parallel to [001].
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
Projection of the whole crystal structure of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 parallel to [010]. Intra- and inter-layer hydrogen bonds are shown with black dashed lines. [Symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, −y, 1 − z.]

2.2. NaK(MoO4)(H2O)

NaK(MoO4)(H2O) crystallizes in the non-centrosymmetric ortho­rhom­bic space group P212121 and comprises four formula units in the unit cell. The MoO4 tetra­hedron (Fig. 8[link]) shows Mo—O bond lengths between 1.754 (3) and 1.785 (3) Å (Table 3[link]) with distortion parameters of QE = 1.0024 and AV = 9.0515. The spread and average value of the Mo—O bonds are consistent with the literature data (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2020View full citation). The sodium cations are coordinated by six ligands involving two water mol­ecules and four oxygen atoms (Fig. 9[link]). The water mol­ecules are located in a trans position. Bond lengths within the Na(H2O)2O4 unit range from 2.342 (3) to 2.453 (3) Å with distortion parameters of QE = 1.0129 and AV = 42.43. Adjacent octa­hedra share two trans edges to form chains running parallel [100] (Fig. 10[link]). The corners of neighbouring octa­hedra (O1, O3) are linked via MoO4 groups that assume a staggered configuration along the chain direction. The comparatively short O1–O3 edge of the attached rigid tetra­hedra acts as a clamp that induces a cooperative rotation/distortion of the octa­hedra. Additional MoO4 tetra­hedra are connected to one of the vertices of the edge that is common to adjacent octa­hedra inside the chain. Again, the units adopt a staggered configuration when viewed along [100]. The resulting chemical composition of the heteropolyhedral chains corresponds to Na(MoO4)2(H2O). Charge compensation is provided by potassium cations, which are incorporated in the voids between the chains. In more detail, each K+ ion is coordinated by eight next oxygen ligands including one water mol­ecule (Fig. 11[link]). Up to 3.2 Å, the K—O bond lengths vary between 2.724 (3) and 3.198 (3) Å (average value: 2.897 Å). The <K—O> distance is in excellent agreement with the value of 2.894 Å reported by Gagné & Hawthorne (2016View full citation) for K[8]. The hydrogen atoms of the water mol­ecule O5W form single hydrogen bonds with the oxygen atoms O2 and O3, respectively (Fig. 8[link], Table 4[link]). The O3⋯H52 inter­action represents an intra-chain bond, whilst the corresponding O2⋯H51 hydrogen bond connects neighbouring heteropolyhedral chains. The donor–acceptor distances are indicative of hydrogen bonds of medium strength (Steiner, 2002View full citation). A projection of the whole crystal structure of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) is presented in Fig. 12[link].

Table 3
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for NaK(MoO4)(H2O)

Mo—O1 1.754 (3) Na—O3iii 2.453 (3)
Mo—O2 1.755 (3) K—O1vii 2.724 (3)
Mo—O4i 1.767 (2) K—O2 2.791 (3)
Mo—O3ii 1.785 (3) K—O3 2.798 (3)
Na—O5Wiii 2.342 (3) K—O3viii 2.840 (3)
Na—O4 2.352 (3) K—O5W 2.919 (3)
Na—O1iv 2.406 (3) K—O4i 2.930 (3)
Na—O5Wv 2.411 (3) K—O2ii 2.978 (3)
Na—O4vi 2.442 (3) K—O1ii 3.198 (3)
       
O1—Mo—O2 107.95 (14) O2—K—O3viii 131.11 (8)
O1—Mo—O4i 112.21 (13) O3—K—O3viii 139.67 (4)
O2—Mo—O4i 105.53 (12) O1vii—K—O5W 75.74 (8)
O1—Mo—O3ii 113.38 (12) O2—K—O5W 168.15 (8)
O2—Mo—O3ii 110.03 (14) O3—K—O5W 79.82 (8)
O4i—Mo—O3ii 107.46 (14) O3viii—K—O5W 59.86 (7)
O5Wiii—Na—O4 91.84 (12) O1vii—K—O4i 71.77 (8)
O5Wiii—Na—O1iv 81.07 (10) O2—K—O4i 58.63 (8)
O4—Na—O1iv 88.45 (11) O3—K—O4i 133.12 (9)
O5Wiii—Na—O5Wv 170.65 (10) O3viii—K—O4i 81.38 (8)
O4—Na—O5Wv 93.93 (11) O5W—K—O4i 132.68 (7)
O1iv—Na—O5Wv 91.72 (10) O1vii—K—O2ii 146.17 (9)
O5Wiii—Na—O4vi 93.35 (11) O2—K—O2ii 81.77 (7)
O4—Na—O4vi 170.77 (10) O3—K—O2ii 122.05 (8)
O1iv—Na—O4vi 84.82 (10) O3viii—K—O2ii 69.32 (8)
O5Wv—Na—O4vi 80.00 (11) O5W—K—O2ii 100.67 (8)
O5Wiii—Na—O3iii 99.81 (10) O4i—K—O2ii 88.47 (8)
O4—Na—O3iii 86.15 (10) O1vii—K—O1ii 142.92 (4)
O1iv—Na—O3iii 174.55 (13) O2—K—O1ii 104.43 (8)
O5Wv—Na—O3iii 87.93 (10) O3—K—O1ii 73.36 (8)
O4vi—Na—O3iii 100.47 (11) O3viii—K—O1ii 90.15 (9)
O1vii—K—O2 108.71 (9) O5W—K—O1ii 68.64 (8)
O1vii—K—O3 90.85 (10) O4i—K—O1ii 142.43 (8)
O2—K—O3 89.04 (8) O2ii—K—O1ii 54.56 (7)
O1vii—K—O3viii 80.51 (9)    
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation; (vi) Mathematical equation; (vii) Mathematical equation; (viii) Mathematical equation.

Table 4
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for NaK(MoO4)(H2O)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O5W—H51⋯O2viii 0.85 (1) 1.93 (2) 2.700 (4) 151 (4)
O5W—H52⋯O3viii 0.85 (1) 2.05 (2) 2.874 (4) 163 (4)
Symmetry code: (viii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 8]
Figure 8
Single MoO4 tetra­hedron in NaK(MoO4)(H2O) and the hydrogen bonds (dashed black lines) involving the corresponding oxygen atoms. Molybdenum, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in gray, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 1 − y, z; (ii) x − Mathematical equation, −y + Mathematical equation, 1 − z; (iii) 1 − x, y  + Mathematical equation, −z + Mathematical equation; (iv) −x + Mathematical equation, −y, z − Mathematical equation.]
[Figure 9]
Figure 9
Single Na(H2O)2O4 octa­hedron in NaK(MoO4)(H2O). Sodium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in yellow, red and white, respectively. Displacement ellipsoids are given at the 70% probability level except for H atoms, which are shown with an arbitrary radius. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + Mathematical equation, 1 − y, z − Mathematical equation; (ii) −x + Mathematical equation, 1 − y, z + Mathematical equation; (iii) 1 − x, y + Mathematical equation, −z − Mathematical equation; (iv) x + Mathematical equation, −y + Mathematical equation, 1 − z.]
[Figure 10]
Figure 10
Side view of a heteropolyhedral Na(MoO4)2(H2O) chain in NaK(MoO4)(H2O).
[Figure 11]
Figure 11
Single coordination polyhedron for potassium in NaK(MoO4)(H2O). Potassium, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in purple, red and white, respectively. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + Mathematical equation, −y, z + Mathematical equation; (ii) 1 − x, y − Mathematical equation, −z + Mathematical equation; (iii) x, y − 1, z; (iv) x − Mathematical equation, −y + Mathematical equation, 1 − z.]
[Figure 12]
Figure 12
Projection of the whole crystal structure of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) parallel to [100]. Intra- and inter-chain hydrogen bonds are shown with black dashed lines. [Symmetry code: (i) -x + Mathematical equation, −y, z + Mathematical equation.]

2.3. Bond-valence sums

For both alkali molybdate hydrates, calculations of bond-valence sums (BVS) in valence units (v.u.) were performed using the parameter sets for Mo—O, Na—O and K—O listed by Brown & Altermatt (1985View full citation) to verify the correctness of the structure models. The BVS values for all atomic sites are summarized in Tables 5[link] and 6[link]. The calculations were performed both with and without the contributions of the hydrogen atoms of the water mol­ecules. Following the suggestion of Hawthorne (1997View full citation), the effect of the hydrogen atoms has been taken into consideration by attributing 0.8 v.u. to the donor oxygen atom and 0.2 v.u. to the acceptor oxygen of the hydrogen bond. The results generally compare well with the expected values of 1.00 v.u. for K, 6.00 for Mo and 2.00 v.u. for O. However, it is noteworthy, that the sodium cations show slightly larger deviations from 1.00 v.u. (BVS values of 1.22 v.u.), indicating an overbonding; that is, the octa­hedral voids occupied by this type of alkali cation are slightly too small.

Table 5
Bond-valence sums for Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 in valence units (v.u.)

The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O⋯H contributions are taken into consideration (see text).

  Mo Na K Sum
O1 1.516 0.190×2↓×3→   2.087
O2 1.456×3↓×1→     1.456 (2.056)
O3   0.203; 0.180   0.383 (1.983)
O4   0.232×2↓×1→ 0.148×6↓×1→ 0.380 (1.981)
Sum 5.884 1.227 0.890  

Table 6
Bond valence sums for NaK(MoO4)(H2O) in valence units (v.u.)

The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O⋯H contributions are taken into consideration (see text).

  Mo Na K Sum
O1 1.512 0.196 0.202; 0.056 1.966
O2 1.508   0.168; 0.102 1.778 (1.978)
O3 1.391 0.173 0.165; 0.148 1.877 (2.077)
O4 1.450 0.227; 0.178 0.116 1.980
O5   0.233; 0.193 0.119 0.545 (2.146)
Sum 5.871 1.200 1.076  

2.4. Thermal expansion

Unfortunately, the crystals of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 were not stable at ambient conditions for more than a couple of hours. Therefore, it was decided to determine the thermal expansion tensor only for NaK(MoO4)(H2O). For the data collection at 193 K, the crystal was mounted on a LithoLoop (Mol­ecular Dimensions) using a drop of Paratone-N oil (Hampton Research) and immersed in a cold air stream generated by an Oxford Cryosystems Desktop Cooler. The very same sample was then affixed to the tip of a glass fibre with fingernail hardener, in order to obtain data at 296 K. As the refined structural parameters of the room-temperature investigation are essentially identical to those of the low-temperature study, they will not be reported in detail. Instead, the focus will be on determining the thermal expansion tensor from the two sets of lattice parameters. Please refer to Table 7[link] for the respective values for 193 K. The corresponding values at ambient temperature are as follows: a = 6.4859 (7) Å, b = 8.1025 (8) Å, and c = 10.1835 (12) Å. The average thermal expansion tensor αij for a given temperature inter­val, ΔT, can be calculated from the thermal strain tensor ɛij and the relationship αij = ɛij/ΔT. Due to the ortho­rhom­bic symmetry restrictions, the off-diagonal terms of the symmetric second-rank tensor αij with ij must be strictly zero. The remaining three components can be obtained from the following expressions: ɛ11 = (a/a0) −1, ɛ22 = (b/b0) −1 and ɛ33 = (c/c0) −1. Notably, the lattice parameters with the suffix ‘zero' pertain to the low-tem­per­ature data. In consequence, the off-diagonal components have the following values: α11 = 11 (1) × 10−6, α22 = 39 (1) × 10−6, and α33 = 42 (1) × 10−6. From the comparison of the numerical values it is obvious that the thermal expansion shows a pronounced anisotropy. The expansion along [100], that is, along the rigid chain-like building blocks of the crystal structure, is about a factor four smaller than along [010] and [001], respectively. Notably, α22 and α33 are equal within two standard deviations. By plotting the values of the thermal expansion tensor as a function of all directions one obtains a convenient geometric representation of the anisotropic behaviour of the tensor in the form of a surface in three-dimensional space (Fig. 13[link]).

Table 7
Experimental details

  Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 NaK(MoO4)(H2O)
Crystal data
Mr 590.09 240.04
Crystal system, space group Hexagonal, P63/m Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K) 193 193
a, b, c (Å) 9.4974 (11), 9.4974 (11), 12.2139 (14) 6.4781 (8), 8.0697 (10), 10.1399 (13)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 120 90, 90, 90
V3) 954.10 (19) 530.08 (11)
Z 2 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.67 3.27
Crystal size (mm) 0.43 × 0.09 × 0.06 0.18 × 0.14 × 0.06
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
Absorption correction Analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2020View full citation). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995View full citation)] Analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2020View full citation). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995View full citation)]
Tmin, Tmax 0.981, 0.995 0.738, 0.869
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7218, 800, 697 3887, 1249, 1208
Rint 0.046 0.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.658 0.658
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.022, 0.06, 1.09 0.024, 0.058, 1.07
No. of reflections 800 1249
No. of parameters 49 79
No. of restraints 5 3
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.16, −0.64 0.43, −0.87
Absolute structure Flack (1983View full citation)
Absolute structure parameter −0.01 (7)
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2020View full citation), SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005View full citation), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008View full citation), VESTA-3 (Momma & Izumi, 2011View full citation) and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012View full citation).
[Figure 13]
Figure 13
Three-dimensional representation surface of the average thermal expansion tensor of NaK(MoO4)(H2O) in the inter­val between 193 and 296 K.

3. Database survey

As mentioned above, Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 is isotypic with the corresponding rubidium compound (Klevtsova et al., 1990View full citation). For the calculation of several qu­anti­tative descriptors for the characterization of the degree of similarity, the program COMPSTRU (de la Flor et al., 2016View full citation) was employed. After a transformation according to a′ = –b, b′ = –a, and c′ = –c the structure of Na3Rb(MoO4)2(H2O)9 was transformed to the most similar configuration of Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9. The calculations revealed the following displacements (in Å) between the corresponding atom pairs in both phases: Mo: 0.011; Na: 0.034; K: 0.000; O1: 0.011; O2: 0.040; O3: 0.063; O4: 0.124. The measure of similarity (Δ) as defined by Bergerhoff et al. (1999View full citation) has a value of 0.030. Notably, the most pronounced shifts occur between the oxygen atoms of the water mol­ecules surrounding the potassium cations. The degree of lattice distortion S is related to the spontaneous strain that can be obtained from a comparison of the unit-cell parameters of both phases. In more detail, it is the square root of the sum of the squared eigenvalues of the strain tensor divided by 3. For the given two structure descriptions, S has a value of 0.0075. To the best of the author's knowledge, the presence of the Na3O2(H2O)9 or more generally, M3φ11 units built on three octa­hedra sharing two faces, is rather an exception. According to Pauling's third rule (Pauling, 1929View full citation), shared faces between coordination polyhedra dramatically decreases the stability of a crystal structure. It is noteworthy, that one of the cesium suboxides contains equivalent anion-centred units with composition O3Cs11 (Simon et al., 1978View full citation).

NaK(MoO4)(H2O) represents a new structure type. Nevertheless, its characteristic [6]M(TO4)2φ chains (φ: H2O, OH, F) have been already observed in a number of phosphate-, arsenate- and vanadate-based minerals including wherryite [Pb7Cu2(SO4)4(SiO4)2(OH)2; Cooper & Haw­thorne, 1994View full citation] and brackebuschite [Pb2(Mn3+,Fe3+)(VO4)2(OH); Foley et al., 1997View full citation], for example. Further representatives can be found in the review publications of Hawthorne (1998View full citation) and Lussier & Hawthorne (2021View full citation) on decorated and undecorated chains of edge-sharing octa­hedra. The present phase is the first pure molybdate member of this group of compounds. Further examples of low-hydrated mixed alkali hydrates containing sodium include NaLi(MoO4)(H2O)2 (Makitova et al., 1990View full citation) and NaCs(MoO4)(H2O)2 (Klevtsov et al., 1997View full citation). However, these two materials are structurally not related to the present compound. The first phase is composed of units of two Na(H2O)2O4 octa­hedra and two Li(H2O)2O3 tetra­gonal pyramids sharing common edges, which are linked by MoO4 tetra­hedra. The structural backbones of the latter compound comprise chains of face-sharing Na(H2O)4O2 octa­hedra, which are decorated with MoO4 tetra­hedra. Only very recently, chemically related Na2(MoO4)(H2O)2, a synthetic compound with some relevance in industrial inorganic chemistry, has also been found in nature in a fumarole deposit of the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. The new mineral was named natromolybdite (Pekov et al., 2025View full citation). It is possible, that a natural equivalent of synthetic NaK(MoO4)(H2O) can be found in similar petrographic environments. According to the present investigation, NaK(MoO4)(H2O) exhibits high solubility in water and crystallizes readily. This may provide an opportunity for the targeted growth of larger crystals of this acentric phase, which could be further studied for potential applications in nonlinear optics, for example.

4. Synthesis and crystallization

The two compounds were obtained as by-products in crystal growth experiments aimed at synthesizing silicates from the quaternary Na2O–K2O–CaO–SiO2 system. A total of 0.5 g of the nutrient, composed of Na2O:K2O:CaO:SiO2 in a molar ratio of 1:1:6:12, was thoroughly homogenized in an agate mortar with 2.5 g of a Na2MoO4–K2MoO4 fluxing agent (molar ratio 1:1). The sample was then heated in a covered platinum crucible from room temperature to 1373 K at a heating rate of 2 K min−1. Following a three-day holding period at the maximum temperature, the sample was cooled to 1023 K at a rate of 0.1 K min−1. The crucible was then removed and quenched in air to ambient conditions. Following mechanical removal of the melt cake, the silicate phases were separated by dissolving the flux in distilled water on a watch glass at 295 K and 43% relative humidity (RH). New crystals were formed spontaneously in the remaining solution, which had been saturated with alkali molybdates, through slow evaporation of the solvent over the course of several hours. The presence of two distinct birefringent phases was indicated by differences in morphology (laths, plates). This was subsequently confirmed by single-crystal diffraction experiments. Following exposure to air (295 K, 43% RH) for a period of several hours, the initially transparent lath-shaped crystals of phase 1 [Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9] exhibited a transition in colour to an opaque hue, suggesting a gradual deterioration due to an ongoing dehydration process.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 7[link]. To prevent possible water release, data acquisitions were performed at 193 K. Unconstrained site-population refinements of the K/Na populations on the relevant sites under the assumption of full occupancy did not show any indications for cation substitutions between the alkali atoms and, therefore, the non-tetra­hedral cation positions were occupied with either Na or K, respectively. Difference-Fourier calculations were employed to reveal the positions of the hydrogen atoms. This procedure allowed the location of the hydrogen atoms of all water sites in the asymmetric units of both phases. The positional parameters of the H-atoms were further optimized by a riding model with water-mol­ecule geometries restrained by DFIX 0.86 0.01 commands for the O—H and DFIX 1.35 0.02 commands for the H⋯H distances (giving H—O—H angles close to 105°). The isotropic displacement parameters for the H atoms of the water mol­ecules were coupled to those of the corresponding oxygen atoms according to Uiso(H) = 1.2×Ueq(O). The Flack parameter of acentric NaK(MoO4)(H2O) indicates that the absolute structure has been determined correctly (Table 7[link]).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Trisodium potassium bis(orthomolybdate) nonahydrate (Na3KMoO42H2O9) top
Crystal data top
Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9Dx = 2.054 Mg m3
Mr = 590.09Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hexagonal, P63/mCell parameters from 2517 reflections
Hall symbol: -P 6cθ = 4.9–29.7°
a = 9.4974 (11) ŵ = 1.67 mm1
c = 12.2139 (14) ÅT = 193 K
V = 954.10 (19) Å3Lath-shaped fragment, colourless
Z = 20.43 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm
F(000) = 580
Data collection top
Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
diffractometer
800 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source697 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.046
Detector resolution: 10.3575 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scansh = 1212
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlisPro (Rigaku OD, 2020). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995)]
k = 1112
Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.995l = 1615
7218 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0297P)2 + 0.6304P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
800 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.16 e Å3
49 parametersΔρmin = 0.64 e Å3
5 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0051 (10)
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mo0.333330.666670.97769 (2)0.01574 (14)
Na0.16850 (16)0.45384 (16)0.250.0222 (3)
K000.250.0362 (3)
O10.333330.666670.1213 (2)0.0190 (6)
O20.1881 (2)0.4711 (2)0.93025 (14)0.0260 (4)
O3W0.4008 (3)0.4183 (3)0.250.0275 (5)
H30.428 (3)0.383 (3)0.1942 (4)0.033*
O4W0.0281 (2)0.2565 (2)0.11551 (15)0.0320 (4)
H410.0704 (15)0.236 (4)0.110 (2)0.038*
H420.074 (3)0.307 (4)0.0563 (16)0.038*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mo0.01825 (16)0.01825 (16)0.0107 (2)0.00912 (8)00
Na0.0222 (7)0.0200 (6)0.0219 (6)0.0086 (5)00
K0.0325 (5)0.0325 (5)0.0438 (8)0.0162 (2)00
O10.0210 (9)0.0210 (9)0.0152 (13)0.0105 (4)00
O20.0277 (9)0.0240 (9)0.0233 (9)0.0106 (7)0.0061 (7)0.0050 (7)
O3W0.0396 (15)0.0378 (14)0.0172 (11)0.0283 (13)00
O4W0.0249 (9)0.0384 (11)0.0281 (9)0.0125 (9)0.0010 (8)0.0002 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mo—O1i1.753 (3)Na—O12.418 (2)
Mo—O2ii1.7683 (16)Na—O3Wv2.437 (3)
Mo—O21.7683 (16)K—O4Wvi2.8381 (19)
Mo—O2iii1.7683 (16)K—O4Wiv2.8381 (19)
Na—O4W2.343 (2)K—O4Wvii2.8381 (19)
Na—O4Wiv2.343 (2)K—O4Wviii2.8381 (19)
Na—O3W2.392 (3)K—O4W2.8381 (19)
Na—O1v2.418 (2)K—O4Wix2.8381 (19)
O1i—Mo—O2ii109.13 (6)O3W—Na—O3Wv157.63 (10)
O1i—Mo—O2109.13 (6)O1v—Na—O3Wv81.06 (6)
O2ii—Mo—O2109.81 (6)O1—Na—O3Wv81.06 (6)
O1i—Mo—O2iii109.13 (6)O4Wvi—K—O4Wiv131.88 (2)
O2ii—Mo—O2iii109.81 (6)O4Wvi—K—O4Wvii70.73 (8)
O2—Mo—O2iii109.81 (6)O4Wiv—K—O4Wvii89.86 (6)
O4W—Na—O4Wiv89.02 (10)O4Wvi—K—O4Wviii131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O3W94.79 (8)O4Wiv—K—O4Wviii89.86 (6)
O4Wiv—Na—O3W94.79 (8)O4Wvii—K—O4Wviii89.86 (6)
O4W—Na—O1v175.15 (8)O4Wvi—K—O4W89.86 (5)
O4Wiv—Na—O1v94.84 (7)O4Wiv—K—O4W70.73 (8)
O3W—Na—O1v81.99 (6)O4Wvii—K—O4W131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O194.84 (7)O4Wviii—K—O4W131.88 (2)
O4Wiv—Na—O1175.15 (8)O4Wvi—K—O4Wix89.85 (5)
O3W—Na—O181.99 (6)O4Wiv—K—O4Wix131.88 (2)
O1v—Na—O181.15 (11)O4Wvii—K—O4Wix131.88 (2)
O4W—Na—O3Wv101.09 (8)O4Wviii—K—O4Wix70.73 (8)
O4Wiv—Na—O3Wv101.09 (8)O4W—K—O4Wix89.86 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) x+y, x+1, z; (iii) y+1, xy+1, z; (iv) x, y, z+1/2; (v) x+y, x+1, z+1/2; (vi) y, xy, z; (vii) y, xy, z+1/2; (viii) x+y, x, z+1/2; (ix) x+y, x, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3W—H3···O2x0.85 (1)1.94 (1)2.793 (2)174 (3)
O4W—H41···O2xi0.86 (1)1.90 (1)2.746 (2)169 (3)
O4W—H42···O2xii0.86 (1)2.07 (1)2.913 (3)168 (3)
Symmetry codes: (x) y, x+y, z+1; (xi) xy, x, z+1; (xii) x, y, z1.
Sodium potassium orthomolybdate monohydrate (NaKMoO4H2O) top
Crystal data top
NaK(MoO4)(H2O)F(000) = 456
Mr = 240.04Dx = 3.008 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 1970 reflections
a = 6.4781 (8) Åθ = 5.6–29.5°
b = 8.0697 (10) ŵ = 3.27 mm1
c = 10.1399 (13) ÅT = 193 K
V = 530.08 (11) Å3Irregular fragment, colourless
Z = 40.18 × 0.14 × 0.06 mm
Data collection top
Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
diffractometer
1249 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1208 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 10.3575 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 3.7°
ω scansh = 88
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlisPro (Rigaku OD, 2020). Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by (Clark & Reid, 1995)]
k = 1010
Tmin = 0.738, Tmax = 0.869l = 1313
3887 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.058 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0269P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1249 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
79 parametersΔρmin = 0.87 e Å3
3 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.01 (7)
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mo0.51460 (5)0.11176 (3)0.30697 (3)0.00784 (10)
Na0.7761 (2)0.7544 (2)0.48190 (14)0.0127 (3)
K0.49819 (15)0.13919 (9)0.65476 (8)0.01524 (18)
O10.7135 (4)0.1024 (4)0.1899 (2)0.0156 (6)
O20.5594 (5)0.2846 (3)0.4081 (2)0.0181 (7)
O30.7634 (5)0.3755 (4)0.7646 (2)0.0136 (6)
O40.5160 (5)0.9389 (3)0.4140 (2)0.0140 (5)
O5W0.4645 (5)0.0528 (3)0.9335 (2)0.0131 (6)
H510.500 (6)0.022 (3)0.987 (3)0.016*
H520.376 (5)0.009 (4)0.883 (3)0.016*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mo0.00733 (15)0.00843 (15)0.00776 (16)0.00002 (14)0.00045 (13)0.00036 (10)
Na0.0095 (8)0.0153 (7)0.0133 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0009 (6)0.0002 (7)
K0.0175 (4)0.0158 (3)0.0124 (4)0.0007 (4)0.0005 (4)0.0013 (3)
O10.0144 (13)0.0201 (15)0.0122 (12)0.0029 (13)0.0035 (11)0.0066 (15)
O20.0266 (19)0.0115 (12)0.0163 (13)0.0028 (12)0.0006 (13)0.0030 (11)
O30.0114 (14)0.0158 (15)0.0137 (13)0.0025 (12)0.0026 (10)0.0014 (13)
O40.0150 (15)0.0122 (11)0.0149 (11)0.0003 (13)0.0007 (13)0.0056 (10)
O5W0.0136 (15)0.0134 (12)0.0121 (12)0.0022 (12)0.0044 (11)0.0016 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mo—O11.754 (3)Na—O3iii2.453 (3)
Mo—O21.755 (3)K—O1vii2.724 (3)
Mo—O4i1.767 (2)K—O22.791 (3)
Mo—O3ii1.785 (3)K—O32.798 (3)
Na—O5Wiii2.342 (3)K—O3viii2.840 (3)
Na—O42.352 (3)K—O5W2.919 (3)
Na—O1iv2.406 (3)K—O4i2.930 (3)
Na—O5Wv2.411 (3)K—O2ii2.978 (3)
Na—O4vi2.442 (3)K—O1ii3.198 (3)
O1—Mo—O2107.95 (14)O2—K—O3viii131.11 (8)
O1—Mo—O4i112.21 (13)O3—K—O3viii139.67 (4)
O2—Mo—O4i105.53 (12)O1vii—K—O5W75.74 (8)
O1—Mo—O3ii113.38 (12)O2—K—O5W168.15 (8)
O2—Mo—O3ii110.03 (14)O3—K—O5W79.82 (8)
O4i—Mo—O3ii107.46 (14)O3viii—K—O5W59.86 (7)
O5Wiii—Na—O491.84 (12)O1vii—K—O4i71.77 (8)
O5Wiii—Na—O1iv81.07 (10)O2—K—O4i58.63 (8)
O4—Na—O1iv88.45 (11)O3—K—O4i133.12 (9)
O5Wiii—Na—O5Wv170.65 (10)O3viii—K—O4i81.38 (8)
O4—Na—O5Wv93.93 (11)O5W—K—O4i132.68 (7)
O1iv—Na—O5Wv91.72 (10)O1vii—K—O2ii146.17 (9)
O5Wiii—Na—O4vi93.35 (11)O2—K—O2ii81.77 (7)
O4—Na—O4vi170.77 (10)O3—K—O2ii122.05 (8)
O1iv—Na—O4vi84.82 (10)O3viii—K—O2ii69.32 (8)
O5Wv—Na—O4vi80.00 (11)O5W—K—O2ii100.67 (8)
O5Wiii—Na—O3iii99.81 (10)O4i—K—O2ii88.47 (8)
O4—Na—O3iii86.15 (10)O1vii—K—O1ii142.92 (4)
O1iv—Na—O3iii174.55 (13)O2—K—O1ii104.43 (8)
O5Wv—Na—O3iii87.93 (10)O3—K—O1ii73.36 (8)
O4vi—Na—O3iii100.47 (11)O3viii—K—O1ii90.15 (9)
O1vii—K—O2108.71 (9)O5W—K—O1ii68.64 (8)
O1vii—K—O390.85 (10)O4i—K—O1ii142.43 (8)
O2—K—O389.04 (8)O2ii—K—O1ii54.56 (7)
O1vii—K—O3viii80.51 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x+3/2, y+1, z1/2; (iv) x+3/2, y+1, z+1/2; (v) x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2; (vi) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (vii) x+3/2, y, z+1/2; (viii) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5W—H51···O2viii0.85 (1)1.93 (2)2.700 (4)151 (4)
O5W—H52···O3viii0.85 (1)2.05 (2)2.874 (4)163 (4)
Symmetry code: (viii) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.
Bond-valence sums for Na3K(MoO4)2(H2O)9 in valence units (v.u.) top
The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O···H contributions are taken into consideration (see text).
MoNaKSum
O11.5160.190×2↓×32.087
O21.456×3↓×11.456 (2.056)
O30.203 ; 0.1800.383 (1.983)
O40.232×2↓×10.148×6↓×10.380 (1.981)
Sum5.8841.2270.890
Bond valence sums for NaK(MoO4)(H2O) in valence units (v.u.) top
The values in parentheses for the oxygen atoms refer to the calculations when O—H and O···H contributions are taken into consideration (see text).
MoNaKSum
O11.5120.1960.202 ; 0.0561.966
O21.5080.168 ; 0.1021.778 (1.978)
O31.3910.1730.165 ; 0.1481.877 (2.077)
O41.4500.227 ; 0.1780.1161.980
O50.233 ; 0.1930.1190.545 (2.146)
Sum5.8711.2001.076
 

References

Return to citationBergerhoff, G., Berndt, M., Brandenburg, K. & Degen, T. (1999). Acta Cryst. B55, 147–156.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBrown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBurla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationClark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationCooper, M. & Hawthorne, F. C. (1994). Can. Mineral. 32, 373–380.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFlor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653–664.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFoley, J. A., Hughes, J. M. & Lange, D. (1997). Can. Mineral. 35, 1027–1033.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 602–625.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2020). IUCrJ 7, 581–629.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHawthorne, F. C. (1997). Modular Aspects of Minerals edited by S. Merlino, pp. 373–429. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationHawthorne, F. C. (1998). Miner. Mag. 62, 141–164.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKlevtsova, R. F., Glinskaya, L. A., Perepelitsa, A. P., Ishchenko, V. N. & Klevtsov, P. V. (1990). Kristallografiya 35, 1094–1098.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKlevtsov, P. V., Glinskaya, L. A., Klevtsova, R. F. & Aleksandrov, K. F. (1997). J. Struct. Chem. 38, 615–619.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrivovichev, S. V. (2009). Structural Crystallography of Inorganic Oxysalts. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationLussier, A. J. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2021). Can. Mineral. 59, 9–30.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMakitova, D. D., Tkachev, V. V. & Atovmyan, L. O. (1990). Koord. Khim. 16, 616–618.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMilošev, I. (2024). Corros. Sci. 229, 111854.  Google Scholar
Return to citationMirzoev, R. S., Karov, Z. G., Kyarov, A. A. & Shetov, R. A. (2007). Izv. Vuzov. Sev.-Kavk. Region. Estestv. Nauki 4, 60–62.  Google Scholar
Return to citationMirzoev, R. S., Shetov, R. A., Ligidov, M. Kh. & El'mesova, R. M. (2010). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 55, 96–102.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMomma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationO'Neil, M. J. (2013). The Merck Index 15th ed., Royal Society of Chemistry.  Google Scholar
Return to citationPauling, L. (1929). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 1010–1026.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPekov, I. V., Britvin, S. N., Koshlyakova, N. N., Agakhanov, A. A., Belakovskiy, D. I., Chukanov, N. V., Ksenofontov, D. A., Turchkova, A. G. & Zhegunov, P. S. (2025). Mineral. Mag. 89, 700–705.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku OD (2020). Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationRobinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science 172, 567–570.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSimon, A., Braemer, W. & Deiseroth, H.-J. (1978). Inorg. Chem. 17, 875–879.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationSteiner, T. (2002). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 48–76.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationVukasovich, M. S. & Farr, J. P. G. (1986). Polyhedron 5, 551–559.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationZagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds