research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and structure of 5-[(4-fluoro­benz­yl)amino]­isophthalic acid featuring O—H⋯O and N—H⋯π inter­actions

crossmark logo

aExcellence Center, Baku State University, Z. Khalilov Str. 33, AZ 1148, Baku, Azerbaijan, bDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Türkiye, cCentro de Estudos de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal, and dDepartment of Chemistry, University of Gondar, PO Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 1 September 2026; accepted 14 September 2026; online 25 September 2026)

In the title compound, C15H12FNO4, the dihedral angle between the aromatic rings is 77.78 (8)°. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are linked into zigzag ribbons propagating along the [210] direction by pairwise O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds through their two carb­oxy­lic acid groups to generate centrosymmetric R22(8) dimers in each case. In addition, mol­ecules are connected via pairwise N—H⋯π inter­actions between the NH groups and the fluoro­benzene rings. Aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions and weak C—H⋯F and C—H⋯O inter­actions also contribute to the packing. A Hirshfeld surface analysis shows that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H⋯H (30.7%), O⋯H/H⋯O (26.1%) and C⋯H/H⋯C (20.3%) contacts.

1. Chemical context

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly porous crystalline materials built from metal ions connected by organic ligands (Chughtai et al., 2015View full citation; Liu et al., 2014View full citation). The functional properties of MOFs can be improved by the design of organic ligands (carboxyl­ates, sulfonates, phospho­nates, etc.) and the variation of metal centres. 5-Amino­isophthalic acid and its derivatives have already been used in the synthesis and design of MOFs (Karmakar et al., 2024View full citation). In order to generate an additional coordination centre and a non-covalent bond donor or acceptor site, 5-amino­isophthalic acid has been functionalized by introducing hydrazone, amide, azo, etc. onto its backbone (Aliyeva et al., 2026View full citation). For example, halogen-bonded hydrazones of 5-amino-2,4,6-tri­bromo­isophthalic acid were employed in the construction of new MOFs and applied in the Henry reaction of aldehydes with nitro­alkanes (Gurbanov et al., 2022View full citation) as well as in the coupling of CO2 with epoxides (Aliyeva et al., 2023View full citation). As a continuation of our research work in this direction, we now describe the synthesis and structure of the title compound, C15H12FNO4 (I).

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

Compound (I) crystallizes in the triclinic space group PMathematical equation with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1[link]). The dihedral angle between the planes of the benzene-1,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (C1–C6) and fluoro­phenyl (C8–C13) rings is 77.78 (8)°. The sum of the bond angles around N1 is 358.7°, implying sp2 hybridization; the unhybridized 2p orbital is well aligned to inter­act with the π system of the C1–C6 ring, which may result in partial double-bond character for the C1—N1 bond [1.3728 (19) Å]. The C14/O1/O2 and C15/O3/O4 carb­oxy­lic acid groups are almost coplanar with their attached ring [dihedral angles = 3.83 (19) and 6.7 (3)°, respectively].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I)[link] with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

The C8—C7—N1 bond angle of 115.64 (13)° for the bridging methyl­ene group deviates significantly from the nominal tetra­hedral value of 109.5° possibly due to steric crowding. The torsion angles of the C2—C1—N1—C7, C1—N1—C7—C8 and N1—C7—C8—C13 groupings are 164.21 (15), 89.38 (19) and 173.68 (14)°, respectively. A short intra­molecular C—H⋯N contact (Table 1[link]) is observed. Otherwise, all geometric parameters for (I) are normal and consistent with those of related compounds listed in the Database survey.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg2 is the centroid of the C8–C13 benzene ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
C9—H9⋯N1 0.96 (1) 2.52 (1) 2.890 (2) 103 (1)
O1—H1O⋯O2i 0.86 (1) 1.77 (1) 2.6326 (16) 177 (2)
O4—H4O⋯O3ii 0.87 (1) 1.79 (1) 2.6518 (15) 176 (2)
N1—H1N⋯Cg2iii 0.87 (1) 2.71 (2) 3.4071 (17) 139 (2)
C12—H12⋯F1iv 0.96 (1) 2.46 (1) 3.2661 (19) 142 (1)
C12—H12⋯O3v 0.96 (1) 2.65 (2) 3.298 (2) 126 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation.

3. Supra­molecular features and Hirshfeld surface analysis

In the extended structure of (I), the mol­ecules are connected into zigzag ribbons propagating along the [210] direction by two centrosymmetric R22(8) dimers formed from pairwise O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving both their carb­oxy­lic acid groups (Fig. 2[link], Table 1[link]). Furthermore, mol­ecules are linked by pairwise N—H⋯π inter­actions between the NH groups and fluoro­benzene rings (Fig. 3[link], Table 1[link]). Simultaneously, the mol­ecules are linked by weak π–π stacking inter­actions [Cg1⋯Cg1a = 3.9798 (10) Å, shift = 2.081 Å; symmetry code (a) 1 − x, 1 − y, −z; Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 benzene ring], generating ribbons propagating along the [011] direction (Fig. 3[link], Table 1[link]). Finally, weak C—H⋯F and C—H⋯O inter­actions between these ribbons may help to consolidate the packing.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
A partial view of the R22(8) motif dimers formed by pairwise O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in the extended structure. Symmetry codes: (a) −x, −y, −z; (b) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
A partial view of the N—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions in the extended structure. Symmetry codes: (c) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z; (d) −x + 1, −y + 2, −z + 1.

A Hirshfeld surface analysis was carried out to further investigate the inter­molecular inter­actions using Crystal Explorer 21 (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation). The Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm is illustrated in Fig. 4[link]. The red spots on the Hirshfeld surface plot indicate the directional inter­actions noted above. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots are shown in Fig. 5[link]: H⋯H (30.7%), O⋯H/H⋯O (26.1%) and C⋯H/H⋯C (20.3%) contacts are the main contributors to the crystal packing. Minor contributions are from F⋯H/H⋯F (7.5%), O⋯C/C⋯O (4.4%), C⋯C (4.0%), F⋯C/C⋯F (2.7%), F⋯O/O⋯F (2.3%), O⋯O (1.1%), N⋯C/C⋯N (0.6%) and F⋯F (0.3%) contacts.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of (I)[link] mapped over dnorm.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for (I)[link] showing (a) all inter­actions, and (b)–(d) the different contact types.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 6.00, update of April 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) found that the most closely related structures to the title compound are N-benzyl­aniline (CSD refcode UREJOR: Betz et al., 2011View full citation), N-benzyl-3-nitro­aniline (YAHDIW: Stilinović & Portada, 2011View full citation) and N-[3,5-bis­(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phen­yl]-1-(2-bromo­phen­yl)methanimine (AKISIA: Kingsley et al., 2025View full citation).

In UREJOR, the N atom is present in a nearly planar mol­ecular geometry (angle sums at the N atom are 358 and 359° in the two mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit). The planes defined by the aromatic rings inter­sect at angles of 80.76 (4) and 81.40 (4)° in the two mol­ecules. In the crystal, N—H⋯π inter­actions connect the two mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit to form infinite homodromic chains propagating along the b axis direction [N⋯π = 3.4782 (12) and 3.4642 (13) Å].

In YAHDIW, the N–meth­yl–3–nitro­aniline system is almost planar and the dihedral angle between the ring planes is 86.0 (6)°. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are connected via strong N—H⋯O and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into chains propagating along [101].

In AKISIA, the imine grouping is nearly coplanar with the 2-bromo­phenyl group, while the N-[3,5-bis­(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phen­yl] moiety is significantly twisted from the imine group [49.61 (5)°]. The imine bond length C7—N1 [1.280 (4) Å] and C7—N1—C8 bond angle [119.1 (2)°] are consistent with atom N1 being sp2 hybridized as in (I). The angle between the least-squares planes formed by C1–C8/N1/Br1 and C8–C15/N1 of 49.61 (5)° is consistent with steric effects involving H7 and H9. The crystal packing involves short C—H⋯Br contacts generating zigzag ribbons flanked by fluorine-rich layers.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

A mixture of 5-amino­isophthalic acid (1.08 g, 6 mmol) and 4-fluoro­benzaldehyde (0.992 mg, 8.0 mmol), in ethanol (95%, 30 ml) was stirred at room temperature. Tri­ethyl­amine (4.16 ml, 30 mmol) was added to the mixture and stirred for 1 h. The mixture became viscous, then an excess of NaBH4 (2 equivalents relative to the imine) was slowly added at 273 K. After 4 h at 273 K, the solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in water (50 ml) and acidified with glacial acetic acid (AcOH) to pH 3–5. After filtration, the product was obtained as a pale-yellowish crystalline solid. Single crystals of (I)[link] were recrystallized from a methanol solution at room temperature. Yield: 71%. Analysis calculated for C15H12FNO4: C 62.28; H 4.18; N 4.84; found: C 62.26; H 4.15; N 4.81%. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 13.20 (br s, 2H, –COOH), 7.81 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.76 (s, 2H, Ar), 7.33 and 7.30 (m, 2H, J = 12.0 Hz, Ar), 6.96 and 6.93 (m, 2H, J = 12.0 Hz, Ar), 6.75 (s, 1H, NH), 4.62 (d, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 161.2, 161.1, 156.7, 144.1, 139.0, 129.2, 127.2, 127.1, 115.3, 113.4, 46.7.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. All hydrogen atoms were found from difference-Fourier maps. Hydroxyl group H atoms wererefined with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O), while other H atoms were refined freely. The restraints O—H = 0.85 (1) Å for the OH group, N—H = 0.86 (1) Å for the NH group, C—H = 0.99 Å for the CH2 group, and C—H = 0.95 Å for the CH group were applied using the DFIX command.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C15H12FNO4
Mr 289.26
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 8.4674 (9), 9.2193 (11), 9.2749 (11)
α, β, γ (°) 102.838 (4), 96.181 (4), 108.027 (4)
V (Å3) 659.01 (13)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.12
Crystal size (mm) 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.21
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.954, 0.966
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 8198, 2722, 2050
Rint 0.036
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.627
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.102, 1.05
No. of reflections 2722
No. of parameters 236
No. of restraints 12
H-atom treatment Only H-atom coordinates refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.24, −0.26
Computer programs: APEX4 and SAINT (Bruker, 2012View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012View full citation) and PLATON (Spek, 2020View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

5-{[(4-Fluorophenyl)methyl]amino}benzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid top
Crystal data top
C15H12FNO4Z = 2
Mr = 289.26F(000) = 300
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.458 Mg m−3
a = 8.4674 (9) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 9.2193 (11) ÅCell parameters from 2691 reflections
c = 9.2749 (11) Åθ = 2.3–26.4°
α = 102.838 (4)°µ = 0.12 mm−1
β = 96.181 (4)°T = 150 K
γ = 108.027 (4)°Prism, yellow
V = 659.01 (13) Å30.35 × 0.30 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2050 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.036
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
θmax = 26.5°, θmin = 2.3°
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.966h = −10→9
8198 measured reflectionsk = −10→11
2722 independent reflectionsl = −9→11
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.102Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0457P)2 + 0.1305P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2722 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
236 parametersΔρmax = 0.24 e Å−3
12 restraintsΔρmin = −0.26 e Å−3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.90425 (13)1.37822 (11)0.33763 (12)0.0396 (3)
O10.06367 (14)0.18670 (14)0.13695 (15)0.0393 (3)
H1O−0.021 (2)0.1019 (17)0.093 (2)0.059*
O20.20181 (15)0.07050 (14)−0.01296 (16)0.0469 (4)
O30.92015 (12)0.60399 (12)0.11820 (12)0.0242 (3)
O40.79097 (13)0.35250 (12)−0.01900 (13)0.0272 (3)
H4O0.8879 (15)0.370 (2)−0.048 (2)0.041*
N10.49379 (17)0.70687 (15)0.43757 (16)0.0280 (3)
H1N0.4006 (16)0.700 (2)0.470 (2)0.043 (6)*
C10.49554 (18)0.58645 (17)0.32082 (17)0.0210 (3)
C20.34918 (19)0.45235 (17)0.25993 (18)0.0213 (3)
H20.2474 (14)0.4463 (18)0.2968 (17)0.024 (4)*
C30.35070 (18)0.32787 (17)0.14517 (17)0.0201 (3)
C40.49641 (18)0.33361 (17)0.08617 (17)0.0195 (3)
H40.4986 (18)0.2491 (14)0.0081 (14)0.021 (4)*
C50.63955 (17)0.46746 (16)0.14245 (16)0.0182 (3)
C60.63946 (18)0.59342 (17)0.25752 (17)0.0200 (3)
H60.7376 (14)0.6865 (13)0.2898 (16)0.017 (4)*
C70.6451 (2)0.82871 (18)0.53084 (18)0.0255 (4)
H7A0.7382 (16)0.7843 (17)0.5426 (18)0.027 (4)*
H7B0.623 (2)0.8617 (19)0.6336 (12)0.029 (4)*
C80.71148 (19)0.97471 (17)0.47556 (17)0.0227 (4)
C90.6414 (2)0.98566 (18)0.33749 (18)0.0269 (4)
H90.5464 (16)0.8975 (15)0.2762 (17)0.034 (5)*
C100.7055 (2)1.12091 (19)0.28966 (19)0.0294 (4)
H100.660 (2)1.128 (2)0.1941 (14)0.039 (5)*
C110.8393 (2)1.24435 (18)0.38301 (19)0.0271 (4)
C120.9112 (2)1.23975 (19)0.5208 (2)0.0306 (4)
H120.9998 (18)1.3310 (15)0.5851 (18)0.042 (5)*
C130.8465 (2)1.10370 (19)0.5663 (2)0.0295 (4)
H130.8931 (19)1.0945 (19)0.6609 (13)0.029 (4)*
C140.19642 (19)0.18422 (18)0.08348 (18)0.0242 (4)
C150.79660 (18)0.48153 (17)0.08001 (17)0.0199 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0492 (6)0.0294 (5)0.0471 (7)0.0152 (5)0.0171 (5)0.0177 (5)
O10.0181 (6)0.0352 (7)0.0475 (8)−0.0046 (5)0.0140 (6)−0.0065 (6)
O20.0265 (7)0.0311 (7)0.0608 (9)−0.0037 (5)0.0170 (6)−0.0162 (6)
O30.0163 (5)0.0229 (5)0.0279 (6)0.0021 (4)0.0077 (5)0.0014 (5)
O40.0176 (6)0.0246 (6)0.0345 (7)0.0044 (5)0.0115 (5)−0.0007 (5)
N10.0193 (7)0.0247 (7)0.0337 (8)0.0037 (6)0.0118 (6)−0.0019 (6)
C10.0198 (8)0.0203 (7)0.0237 (8)0.0071 (6)0.0070 (6)0.0062 (6)
C20.0158 (8)0.0234 (8)0.0263 (8)0.0059 (6)0.0096 (6)0.0082 (6)
C30.0158 (7)0.0199 (7)0.0235 (8)0.0034 (6)0.0041 (6)0.0077 (6)
C40.0189 (8)0.0188 (7)0.0204 (8)0.0062 (6)0.0048 (6)0.0041 (6)
C50.0152 (7)0.0211 (7)0.0203 (8)0.0068 (6)0.0044 (6)0.0083 (6)
C60.0152 (7)0.0189 (7)0.0235 (8)0.0028 (6)0.0035 (6)0.0052 (6)
C70.0259 (9)0.0250 (8)0.0222 (8)0.0072 (7)0.0059 (7)0.0012 (7)
C80.0219 (8)0.0244 (8)0.0225 (8)0.0099 (6)0.0076 (6)0.0031 (6)
C90.0281 (9)0.0257 (8)0.0229 (9)0.0095 (7)0.0026 (7)−0.0010 (7)
C100.0382 (10)0.0307 (9)0.0219 (9)0.0178 (8)0.0051 (7)0.0043 (7)
C110.0317 (9)0.0237 (8)0.0330 (9)0.0140 (7)0.0148 (8)0.0109 (7)
C120.0235 (9)0.0245 (8)0.0382 (10)0.0046 (7)0.0004 (7)0.0051 (7)
C130.0283 (9)0.0292 (9)0.0287 (9)0.0090 (7)−0.0007 (7)0.0079 (7)
C140.0172 (8)0.0250 (8)0.0273 (9)0.0038 (6)0.0074 (7)0.0043 (7)
C150.0176 (8)0.0226 (8)0.0193 (8)0.0067 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0057 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
F1—C111.3651 (18)C4—H40.945 (9)
O1—C141.2809 (19)C5—C61.392 (2)
O1—H1O0.861 (10)C5—C151.488 (2)
O2—C141.2341 (19)C6—H60.953 (9)
O3—C151.2273 (17)C7—C81.514 (2)
O4—C151.3156 (17)C7—H7A1.001 (9)
O4—H4O0.868 (9)C7—H7B0.990 (9)
N1—C11.3728 (19)C8—C91.390 (2)
N1—C71.4460 (19)C8—C131.391 (2)
N1—H1N0.866 (9)C9—C101.387 (2)
C1—C61.399 (2)C9—H90.961 (9)
C1—C21.405 (2)C10—C111.371 (2)
C2—C31.385 (2)C10—H100.952 (9)
C2—H20.952 (9)C11—C121.371 (2)
C3—C41.394 (2)C12—C131.382 (2)
C3—C141.490 (2)C12—H120.958 (9)
C4—C51.384 (2)C13—H130.955 (9)
C14—O1—H1O111.3 (15)C8—C7—H7B108.6 (10)
C15—O4—H4O108.2 (12)H7A—C7—H7B105.5 (14)
C1—N1—C7123.58 (13)C9—C8—C13118.46 (15)
C1—N1—H1N119.1 (13)C9—C8—C7122.41 (14)
C7—N1—H1N116.0 (13)C13—C8—C7119.12 (14)
N1—C1—C6121.89 (13)C10—C9—C8121.07 (15)
N1—C1—C2120.03 (13)C10—C9—H9120.6 (10)
C6—C1—C2118.07 (14)C8—C9—H9118.3 (10)
C3—C2—C1120.61 (14)C11—C10—C9118.13 (15)
C3—C2—H2119.2 (9)C11—C10—H10120.4 (11)
C1—C2—H2120.2 (9)C9—C10—H10121.5 (11)
C2—C3—C4120.87 (13)F1—C11—C12118.15 (15)
C2—C3—C14120.43 (13)F1—C11—C10118.95 (15)
C4—C3—C14118.69 (13)C12—C11—C10122.90 (16)
C5—C4—C3118.82 (13)C11—C12—C13118.20 (15)
C5—C4—H4119.8 (9)C11—C12—H12120.2 (11)
C3—C4—H4121.4 (9)C13—C12—H12121.5 (11)
C4—C5—C6120.82 (13)C12—C13—C8121.23 (16)
C4—C5—C15120.91 (13)C12—C13—H13121.3 (10)
C6—C5—C15118.26 (13)C8—C13—H13117.5 (10)
C5—C6—C1120.73 (13)O2—C14—O1123.59 (14)
C5—C6—H6118.9 (9)O2—C14—C3119.88 (14)
C1—C6—H6120.3 (9)O1—C14—C3116.53 (13)
N1—C7—C8115.64 (13)O3—C15—O4123.33 (13)
N1—C7—H7A110.0 (9)O3—C15—C5122.30 (13)
C8—C7—H7A107.8 (9)O4—C15—C5114.37 (12)
N1—C7—H7B108.8 (10)
C7—N1—C1—C6−16.8 (2)C7—C8—C9—C10−179.75 (14)
C7—N1—C1—C2164.21 (15)C8—C9—C10—C11−0.5 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C3−178.04 (14)C9—C10—C11—F1179.82 (14)
C6—C1—C2—C32.9 (2)C9—C10—C11—C12−0.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.9 (2)F1—C11—C12—C13−179.42 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C14178.51 (14)C10—C11—C12—C130.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.1 (2)C11—C12—C13—C8−0.3 (3)
C14—C3—C4—C5179.50 (14)C9—C8—C13—C12−0.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C61.0 (2)C7—C8—C13—C12−179.85 (15)
C3—C4—C5—C15−178.08 (13)C2—C3—C14—O2−176.06 (16)
C4—C5—C6—C11.1 (2)C4—C3—C14—O23.3 (2)
C15—C5—C6—C1−179.77 (13)C2—C3—C14—O13.2 (2)
N1—C1—C6—C5177.92 (14)C4—C3—C14—O1−177.37 (14)
C2—C1—C6—C5−3.1 (2)C4—C5—C15—O3173.38 (14)
C1—N1—C7—C889.38 (19)C6—C5—C15—O3−5.7 (2)
N1—C7—C8—C9−5.7 (2)C4—C5—C15—O4−6.4 (2)
N1—C7—C8—C13173.68 (14)C6—C5—C15—O4174.48 (13)
C13—C8—C9—C100.8 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the C1–C6 and C8–C13 benzene rings, respectively.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C9—H9···N10.96 (1)2.52 (1)2.890 (2)103 (1)
O1—H1O···O2i0.86 (1)1.77 (1)2.6326 (16)177 (2)
O4—H4O···O3ii0.87 (1)1.79 (1)2.6518 (15)176 (2)
N1—H1N···Cg2iii0.87 (1)2.71 (2)3.4071 (17)139 (2)
C12—H12···F1iv0.96 (1)2.46 (1)3.2661 (19)142 (1)
C12—H12···O3v0.96 (1)2.65 (2)3.298 (2)126 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1; (iv) −x+2, −y+3, −z+1; (v) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The author's contributions are as follows. Conceptualization, AVG, MA and GMM; synthesis and X-ray analysis, AVG; writing (review and editing of the manuscript) AVG, AK and MA; funding acquisition, AVG; supervision, MA.

Funding information

This work has been supported by the Baku State University (Azerbaijan).

References

Return to citationAliyeva, V. A., André, V., Martins, L. M. D. R. S., Frontera, A. & Mahmudov, K. T. (2026). Coord. Chem. Rev. 549, 217257.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationAliyeva, V. A., Paninho, A. B., Nunes, A. V. M., Karmakar, A., Gurbanov, A. V., Rutigliano, A. R., Gallo, E., Mahmudov, K. T. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2023). ACS Omega 8, 42290–42300.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBetz, R., McCleland, C. & Marchand, H. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1195.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2012). APEX4 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationChughtai, A. H., Ahmad, N., Younus, H. A., Laypkov, A. & Verpoort, F. (2015). Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6804–6849.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGurbanov, A. V., Kuznetsov, M. L., Karmakar, A., Aliyeva, V. A., Mahmudov, K. T. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2022). Dalton Trans. 51, 1019–1031.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationKarmakar, A., Santos, A. A. C. D., Liu, P., Gurbanov, A. V., Pires, J., Alegria, E. C. B. A., Hasanov, K. I., Guedes da Silva, M. F., Wang, Z. & Pombeiro, A. L. (2024). Inorg. Chem. 63, 13321–13337.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationKingsley, N. B., Doyon, T. J. & Janzen, D. E. (2025). Acta Cryst. E81, 916–919.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLiu, J., Chen, L., Cui, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, L. & Su, C. Y. (2014). Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6011–6061.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSpek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationStilinović, V. & Portada, T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3013.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890