research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Zn(AsO3)2, a unique structure among arsenates with composition MIIAsV2O6

crossmark logo

aTU Wien, X-Ray Centre, Getreidemarkt 9/E057, 1060 Vienna, Austria, and bTU Wien, Institute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Applied Solid State Chemistry, Getreidemarkt 9/E164-05-1, 1060 Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 2 September 2026; accepted 4 September 2026; online 11 September 2026)

Zinc bis­[catena-arsenate(V)] or catena-poly[zinc-di-μ-arsenato(V)-κ4O:O], [Zn(AsO3)2]n, is isotypic with the low-temperature modification of Zn(PO3)2. The asymmetric unit comprises one Zn atom situated on a twofold rotation axis and one As and three O atoms in general positions. In the crystal structure, the principal building units, ZnO6 octa­hedra and AsO4 tetra­hedra, are condensed into 1∞[ZnO4/2O2/1] zigzag chains and (AsO3)2 polyarsenate chains with a periodicity of two AsO4 tetra­hedra, respectively. The two types of chains extend parallel to [001] and are fused into a compact framework structure. Compared with divalent transition metal arsenates and other arsenates of the formula MIIAs2O6, Zn(AsO3)2 is unique in that arsenic is present exclusively in a tetra­hedral coordination and not in a mixed tetra­hedral/octa­hedral or purely octa­hedral coordination.

1. Chemical context

The zinc arsenate Zn(AsO3)2 has been reported as one of the phases existing in the pseudo-binary system ZnO–As2O5 (Kasenov et al., 1996View full citation). Whereas for the other phases reported in this system complete crystal structure determinations have been carried out in the me­antime (details are given in the database survey), for Zn(AsO3)2 only unit-cell parameters were given on basis of a powder X-ray diffraction study: crystal system ortho­rhom­bic with a = 8.625, b = 9.035, c = 12.494 Å, V = 933 Å3 (Mustafin & Kasenov, 1994View full citation, 1996View full citation). Recent results of crystal structure prediction methods claimed the possible existence of Zn(AsO3)2 (or as stated there of ZnAs2O6). Whereas one study states that this phase has an existence probability of 0.9105 with a polar structure (Gake et al., 2025View full citation; data given in the supporting information) the other states that it crystallizes in the centrosymmetric PbSb2O6 structure type with trigonal symmetry (Griesemer et al., 2025View full citation; supplementary material of this article: OQMD ID 1348395).

We sought to investigate these conflicting claims and carried out experiments on the crystal growth of Zn(AsO3)2. Using a reaction similar to that described by Kasenov et al. (1996View full citation), we were able to isolate single crystals of Zn(AsO3)2 (I) and report here on the results of the crystal structure analysis.

2. Structural commentary

Our study does not confirm any of the previous statements made regarding the ortho­rhom­bic unit cell or possible crystal structures. Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic system in the centrosymmetric space group C2/c and is isotypic with the corresponding phosphate, i.e. low-temperature Zn(PO3)2 (Averbuch-Pouchot et al., 1983View full citation). The unit cell of Zn(AsO3)2 reported by Mustafin & Kasenov (1994View full citation, 1996View full citation) has a doubled volume compared to the unit cell determined here, however, with no apparent metrical relation beyond this.

In the crystal structure of Zn(AsO3)2, the Zn atom is located on a twofold rotation axis (multiplicity 4, Wyckoff letter e), and the As and the three O atom sites on general positions (8f) of space group C2/c. The zinc atom in (I) exhibits a distorted octa­hedral coordination environment with an average Zn—O bond length of 2.090 Å (Table 1[link]), in good agreement with the literature value of 2.110 (86) Å derived from 193 [ZnO6] coordination polyhedra (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2020View full citation). The [ZnO6] octa­hedron shares two of its edges with neighbouring octa­hedra, forming 1∞[ZnO4/2O2/1] zigzag-chains extending parallel to [001] (Fig. 1[link]a). The arsenate tetra­hedron condenses into a polyarsenate chain with a periodicity of two tetra­hedra (Fig. 1[link]b). The bond length distribution (Table 1[link]) in this chain follows the usual pattern, with significantly longer As—O distances to the bridging oxygen atoms (O1, average 1.735 Å) than to the terminal O atoms (O2, O3; average 1.646 Å). The mean average As—O bond length within the AsO4 tetra­hedron (1.690 Å) complies with the literature value [1.687 (27) Å from 508 arsenate tetra­hedra; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018View full citation]. The terminal oxygen atoms of the polyarsenate chain are also the ones that bind to the zinc atoms in adjacent zinc oxide chains, so that the polyarsenate chains are aligned in the same direction as the zinc oxide chains, which leads to a very compact packing in this type of structure (Durif, 1995View full citation). In the crystal structure of (I) (Fig. 2[link]), each zinc oxide chain is surrounded by six polyarsenate chains, and each polyarsenate chain is surrounded by three zinc oxide chains, corresponding to the 1:2 ratio of Zn:As in the formula.

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Zn1—O3 2.0276 (10) As1—O2 1.6518 (10)
Zn1—O2i 2.0786 (10) As1—O1iii 1.7319 (10)
Zn1—O2ii 2.1640 (10) As1—O1iv 1.7379 (10)
As1—O3 1.6336 (10)    
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
(a) One 1∞[ZnO4/2O2/1] zigzag chain, and (b) one polyarsenate chain crossing the unit cell of (I), as shown in projections down [Mathematical equation00]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 97% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x + Mathematical equation, y + Mathematical equation, z; (ii) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (iii) −x + 1, y, −z + Mathematical equation; (iv) x, −y + 1, z − Mathematical equation; (v) −x + Mathematical equation, y + Mathematical equation, −z + Mathematical equation; (vi) −x + Mathematical equation, −y + Mathematical equation, −z.]
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The crystal structure of (I) in polyhedral representation (ZnO6 octa­hedra blue, AsO4 tetra­hedra red), viewed down [00Mathematical equation]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 97% probability level.

The structure model was confirmed using bond-valence-sum calculations (Brown, 2002View full citation) performed with the ECoN21 program (Ilinca, 2022View full citation). The calculated bond-valence sums (Table 2[link]) are close to the expected values of 2, 5 and 2 valence units for Zn, As and O atoms, respectively, and the global instability index (GII) of 0.11 valence units indicates a stable and not particularly strained crystal structure (Salinas-Sanchez et al., 1992View full citation; Brown, 2009View full citation).

Table 2
Bond-valence-sum calculations (in valence units) for Zn(AsO3)2

  Zn1 As1 Σ
O1   1.10, 1.08 2.18
O2 0.36 (1×→, 2×↓), 0.29 (1×→, 2×↓) 1.38 2.03
O3 0.41 (1×→, 2×↓) 1.45 1.86
Σ 2.12 5.01  

Using the compstru program (de la Flor et al., 2016View full citation) that is available at the Bilbao Crystallographic Server (Aroyo et al., 2006View full citation), a qu­anti­tative comparison of the isotypic structures of low-temperature Zn(PO3)2 and Zn(AsO3)2 was made. The arithmetic mean of the distance between paired atoms is 0.1148 Å, and the absolute distances between paired atoms are 0.0925 Å for Zn1, 0.0598 Å for As1/P1, 0.0901 Å for O1, 0.1146 Å for O2, and the largest distance of 0.2057 Å for O3. The latter O atoms are those which, in both structures, have both the shortest Zn—O and the shortest X—O (X = As, P) bond lengths. The degree of lattice distortion (0.0264), and the low value for the measure of similarity (0.023) indicate a high degree of similarity for the two crystal structures.

3. Database survey

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD, data release 2025.1; Zagorac et al., 2019View full citation) was used for the database search. Known structurally characterized phases in the ZnO–As2O5 system include the high- and low-temperature modifications of tetra­zinc bis­(arsenate(V)) oxide, Zn4(AsO4)2O (Frerichs et al., 1996aView full citation), dimorphic trizinc orthoarsenate, Zn3(AsO4)2 (Frerichs et al., 1996bView full citation), and the pyroarsenate Zn2As2O7 with three modifications existing at different temperatures, one of which is commensurately and one is incommensurately modulated (Weil & Stöger, 2010View full citation).

As already mentioned, Zn(AsO3)2 is isotypic with Zn(PO3)2, in its low-temperature modification (Averbuch-Pouchot et al., 1983View full citation). The high-temperature modification of Zn(PO3)2 can be obtained by quenching from the recrystallized melt and contains a similar polyphosphate chain but in contrast to the low-temperature modification with two unique zinc cations in tetra­hedral coordination (Weil, 2004View full citation). According to the information on the system ZnO–As2O5 provided by Kasenov et al. (1996View full citation), there are no indications of a possible high-temperature form of Zn(AsO3)2. Other M(PO3)2 polyphosphates isotypic with low-temperature Zn(PO3)2 and Zn(AsO3)2 can only be prepared by using high pressure (∼80 kbar) and temperatures (∼1270 K) and are reported for M = Ni, Mg, Cu, Co, Fe, Mn, and Cd (Bagieu-Beucher et al., 1976View full citation).

Zn(AsO3)2 is the only arsenate phase with an M:AsV ratio of 1:2 where solely tetra­hedral AsO4 units are present in the polymeric arsenate anion. Except for M = Ba with a catena-arsenate anion consisting of AsO4 tetra­hedra and AsO6 octa­hedra (Weil, 2016View full citation), all other MAs2O6 phases crystallize in the PbSb2O6 type of structure (Hill, 1987View full citation) in the trigonal space group type PMathematical equation1m. This structure type is also referred to as the rosiaite structure type after the mineral of this name (Basso et al., 1996View full citation) and is based on a hexa­gonal array of O atoms with the As atom octa­hedrally coordinated in form of honeycomb layers. This structure type is realized for M = Ni, Co, Mn (Nakua & Greedan, 1995View full citation), Cd (Weil, 2001View full citation), Hg (Weil, 2000View full citation), Pd (Orosel & Jansen, 2006View full citation), Ca, Pb (Losilla et al., 1995View full citation), and Sr. The strontium phase is dimorphic and as well as in a rosiaite-type structure also crystallizes in a hexa­gonal superstructure with a doubled unit cell (Weil et al., 2009View full citation).

4. Synthesis and crystallization

Crystal growth procedures were carried out in sealed and evacuated silica ampoules using commercially available chemicals as received. A molar 1:1 mixture of ZnO (≥ 99%, Carl Roth GmbH) and As2O5 [99.9% (metals basis), abcr] was heated at 750 K for about 336 h. X-ray powder diffraction of the bulk product revealed Zn(AsO3OH)·H2O (mineral name koritnigite; Keller et al., 1980View full citation) and Zn(AsO3)2 as the main phases in an approximate ratio of 1:2. From this mixture, yellowish crystals of Zn(AsO3)2 were isolated for the single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. The presence of the hydrous phase Zn(AsO3OH)·H2O indicates that the hygroscopic starting material As2O5 was indeed not free of water.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link]. Atomic coordinates and labelling were adapted from the isotypic low-temperature phase of Zn(PO3)2 (Averbuch-Pouchot et al., 1983View full citation).

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Zn(AsO3)2]
Mr 311.21
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 300
a, b, c (Å) 10.1061 (10), 9.0308 (8), 5.2801 (5)
β (°) 108.374 (7)
V (Å3) 457.33 (8)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 19.68
Crystal size (mm) 0.04 × 0.02 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Stoe Stadivari
Absorption correction Multi-scan (LANA; Koziskova et al., 2016View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.492, 0.654
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 3846, 797, 770
Rint 0.017
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.762
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.010, 0.028, 1.13
No. of reflections 797
No. of parameters 43
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.40, −0.37
Computer programs: X-AREA (Folkers-Karlsson et al., 2026View full citation), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015View full citation), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation), ATOMS (Dowty, 2006View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

catena-Poly[zinc-di-µ-arsenato(V)-κ4O:O] top
Crystal data top
[Zn(AsO3)2]F(000) = 576
Mr = 311.21Dx = 4.520 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.1061 (10) ÅCell parameters from 5088 reflections
b = 9.0308 (8) Åθ = 3.1–32.8°
c = 5.2801 (5) ŵ = 19.68 mm−1
β = 108.374 (7)°T = 300 K
V = 457.33 (8) Å3Shard, yellow
Z = 40.04 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm
Data collection top
Stoe Stadivari
diffractometer
797 independent reflections
Radiation source: Axo_Mo770 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graded multilayer mirror monochromatorRint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 13.33 pixels mm-1θmax = 32.8°, θmin = 3.1°
rotation method, ω scansh = −14→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(LANA; Koziskova et al., 2016)
k = −12→13
Tmin = 0.492, Tmax = 0.654l = −7→4
3846 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: isomorphous structure methods
Least-squares matrix: full w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0127P)2 + 0.509P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.010(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.028Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3
S = 1.13Δρmin = −0.36 e Å−3
797 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
43 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.0035 (2)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.0000000.10801 (2)0.2500000.00841 (6)
As10.21468 (2)0.40539 (2)0.24523 (3)0.00640 (5)
O10.36157 (10)−0.00460 (12)0.04492 (19)0.0121 (2)
O20.38566 (10)0.42724 (11)0.35206 (19)0.00870 (17)
O30.15428 (11)0.23634 (11)0.1990 (2)0.0132 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.00662 (11)0.00985 (11)0.00828 (10)0.0000.00168 (8)0.000
As10.00579 (7)0.00774 (8)0.00560 (7)−0.00148 (4)0.00169 (5)−0.00034 (4)
O10.0078 (4)0.0209 (5)0.0074 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0021 (3)0.0056 (4)
O20.0057 (4)0.0118 (4)0.0077 (4)−0.0008 (3)0.0008 (3)0.0008 (3)
O30.0139 (5)0.0094 (4)0.0172 (5)−0.0052 (4)0.0061 (4)−0.0020 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—O32.0276 (10)Zn1—O2v2.1640 (10)
Zn1—O3i2.0276 (10)As1—O31.6336 (10)
Zn1—O2ii2.0786 (10)As1—O21.6518 (10)
Zn1—O2iii2.0786 (10)As1—O1vi1.7319 (10)
Zn1—O2iv2.1640 (10)As1—O1vii1.7379 (10)
O3—Zn1—O3i110.28 (6)O2iii—Zn1—O2v88.05 (3)
O3—Zn1—O2ii99.15 (4)O2iv—Zn1—O2v82.06 (5)
O3i—Zn1—O2ii90.92 (4)O3—As1—O2117.65 (5)
O3—Zn1—O2iii90.92 (4)O3—As1—O1vi108.08 (5)
O3i—Zn1—O2iii99.15 (4)O2—As1—O1vi111.48 (5)
O2ii—Zn1—O2iii162.38 (6)O3—As1—O1vii108.20 (5)
O3—Zn1—O2iv163.24 (4)O2—As1—O1vii110.65 (5)
O3i—Zn1—O2iv84.54 (4)O1vi—As1—O1vii99.15 (3)
O2ii—Zn1—O2iv88.05 (3)As1vi—O1—As1v130.01 (6)
O2iii—Zn1—O2iv78.64 (4)As1—O2—Zn1iii121.02 (5)
O3—Zn1—O2v84.54 (4)As1—O2—Zn1viii126.04 (5)
O3i—Zn1—O2v163.24 (4)Zn1iii—O2—Zn1viii101.35 (4)
O2ii—Zn1—O2v78.64 (4)As1—O3—Zn1141.36 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iv) x−1/2, y−1/2, z; (v) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (vii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (viii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
Bond-valence-sum calculations (in valence units) for Zn(AsO3)2 top
Zn1As1Σ
O11.10, 1.082.18
O20.36 (1×→, 2×↓), 0.29 (1×→, 2×↓)1.382.03
O30.41 (1×→, 2×↓)1.451.86
Σ2.125.01
 

Acknowledgements

TU Wien Bibliothek is acknowledged for financial support through its Open Access Funding Program.

References

Return to citationAroyo, M. I., Perez-Mato, J. M., Capillas, C., Kroumova, E., Ivantchev, S., Madariaga, G., Kirov, A. & Wondratschek, H. (2006). Z. Kristallogr. 221, 15–27.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationAverbuch-Pouchot, M. T., Durif, A. & Bagieu-Beucher, M. (1983). Acta Cryst. C39, 25–26.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBagieu-Beucher, M., Gondrand, M. & Perroux, M. (1976). J. Solid State Chem. 19, 353–357.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBasso, R., Lucchetti, G., Zefiro, L. & Palenzona, A. (1996). Eur. J. Mineral. 8, 487–492.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBrown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBrown, I. D. (2009). Chem. Rev. 109, 6858–6919.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDowty, E. (2006). ATOMS. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDurif, A. (1995). Crystal Chemistry of Condensed Phosphates pp. 167–168 New York and London: Plenum Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationFlor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653–664.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFolkers-Karlsson, L. C., Celani, P., Hahn, F. & Richter, J. (2026). Z. Kristallogr. 241, 41–51.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFrerichs, D., Park, C. H. & Müller-Buschbaum, Hk. (1996a). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B 51, 233–239.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFrerichs, D., Park, C. H. & Müller-Buschbaum, Hk. (1996b). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B 51, 333–337.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 63–78.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2020). IUCrJ 7, 581–629.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGake, T., Hirai, D. & Hirose, S. (2025). Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 113803.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationGriesemer, S. D., Baldassarri, B., Zhu, R., Shen, J., Pal, K., Park, C. W. & Wolverton, C. (2025). Sci. Adv. 11, eadq1431.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationHill, R. J. (1987). J. Solid State Chem. 71, 12–18.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationIlinca, G. (2022). Minerals 12, 924.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKasenov, B. K., Mustafin, E. S. & Sarkulov, Zh. Kh. (1996). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 41, 839–840.  Google Scholar
Return to citationKeller, P., Hess, H. & Riffel, H. (1980). Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 138, 316–332.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKoziskova, J., Hahn, F., Richter, J. & Kožíšek, J. (2016). Acta Chim. Slovaca 9, 136–140.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLosilla, E. R., Aranda, M. A. G., Ramirez, F. J. & Bruque, S. (1995). J. Phys. Chem. 99, 12975–12979.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationMustafin, E. S. & Kasenov, B. K. (1994). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 39, 716.  Google Scholar
Return to citationMustafin, E. S. & Kasenov, B. K. (1996). J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 68, 529–531.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationNakua, A. M. & Greedan, J. E. (1995). J. Solid State Chem. 118, 402–411.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationOrosel, D. & Jansen, M. (2006). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 632, 1131–1133.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSalinas-Sanchez, A., Garcia-Muñoz, J. L., Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Saez-Puche, R. & Martinez, J. L. (1992). J. Solid State Chem. 100, 201–211.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. (2000). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B 55, 699–706.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, i22–i23.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, i20–i22.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. (2016). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 908–921.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M., Đorđević, T., Lengauer, C. L. & Kolitsch, U. (2009). Solid State Sci. 11, 2111–2117.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. & Stöger, B. (2010). Acta Cryst. B66, 603–614.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationZagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890