crystallization communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of the glutaminyl cyclase from Carica papaya latex

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aLaboratoire de Chimie Générale I, Faculté de Médecine–ULB CP609, 808 Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium, bCNRS–UMR 8525, Institut de Biologie de Lille, BP 477, 1 Rue du Professeur Calmette, F-59021 Lille, France, cEMBL Grenoble Outstation, 6 Rue Jules Horowitz, BP 181, F-38042 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France, and dLaboratoire de Chimie Générale, Institut de Pharmacie–ULB CP206/04, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence e-mail: vincent.villeret@ibl.fr, rene.wintjens@ulb.ac.be

(Received 17 August 2004; accepted 13 October 2004; online 23 October 2004)

In living systems, the intramolecular cyclization of N-terminal glutamine residues is accomplished by glutaminyl cyclase enzymes (EC 2.3.2.5). While in mammals these enzymes are involved in the synthesis of hormonal and neurotransmitter peptides, the physiological role played by the corresponding plant enzymes still remains to be unravelled. Papaya glutaminyl cyclase (PQC), a 33 kDa enzyme found in the latex of the tropical tree Carica papaya, displays an exceptional resistance to chemical and thermal denaturation as well as to proteolysis. In order to elucidate its enzymatic mechanism and to gain insights into the structural determinants underlying its remarkable stability, PQC was isolated from papaya latex, purified and crystallized by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. The crystals belong to the orthorhombic space group P212121, with unit-cell parameters a = 62.82, b = 81.23, c = 108.17 Å and two molecules per asymmetric unit. Diffraction data have been collected at ESRF beamline BM14 and processed to a resolution of 1.7 Å.

Keywords: glutaminyl cyclase.

1. Introduction

Glutaminyl cyclases (QCs; EC 2.3.2.5) catalyse the conversion of N-­terminal glutaminyl residues into pyroglutamic acid with the concomitant liberation of ammonia. QCs are widespread in mammalian neuroendocrine tissues (Sykes et al., 1999[Sykes, P. A., Watson, S. J., Temple, J. S. & Bateman, R. C. Jr (1999). FEBS Lett. 455, 159-161.]; Bockers et al., 1995[Bockers, T. M., Kreutz, M. R. & Pohl, T. (1995). J. Neuroendocrinol. 7, 445-453.]; Wetsel et al., 1995[Wetsel, W. C., Liposits, Z., Seidah, N. G. & Collins, S. (1995). Neuroendocrinology, 62, 166-177.]) and are highly conserved from humans to yeast (Pohl et al., 1991[Pohl, T., Zimmer, M., Mugele, K. & Spiess, J. (1991). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10059-10063.]; Song et al., 1994[Song, I., Chuang, C. Z. & Bateman, R. C. Jr (1994). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 77-86.]; Bateman et al., 2001[Bateman, R. C. Jr, Temple, J. S., Misquitta, S. A. & Booth, R. E. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 11246-11250.]). In mammals, this enzyme has been shown to be involved in the post-translation maturation of a number of bioactive secretory peptides and proteins (Busby et al., 1987[Busby, W. H. J., Quackenbush, G. E., Humm, J., Youngblood, W. W. & Kizer, J. S. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8532-8536.]; Fisher & Spiess, 1987[Fisher, W. H. & Spiess, J. (1987). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 3628-3632.]).

However, the first identified QC was isolated from the latex of the tropical plant Carica papaya in 1963 (Messer, 1963[Messer, M. (1963). Nature (London), 197, 1299.]; Messer & Ottesen, 1965[Messer, M. & Ottesen, M. (1965). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 92, 409-411.]). Since then, putative QCs from other plants have been identified by sequence comparison (Dahl et al., 2000[Dahl, S. W., Slaughter, C., Lauritzen, C., Bateman, R. C. Jr, Connerton, I. & Pedersen, J. (2000). Protein Expr. Purif. 20, 27-36.]; Azarkan et al., 2002[Azarkan, M., Amrani, A., Zerhouni, S., Oberg, K. A., Ruysschaert, J.-M., Wintjens, R. & Looze, Y. (2002). Biopolymers, 65, 325-335.]). Unlike mammalian QCs, the physiological function of plant QCs remains unknown (Amrani et al., 1997[Amrani, A., Wintjens, R., Zerhouni, S., Azarkan, M., Nijs, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1997). Rec. Res. Dev. Phytochem. 1, 25-37.]), although a role in plant defence mechanisms has recently been suggested (El Moussaoui et al., 2001[El Moussaoui, A., Nijs, M., Paul, C., Wintjens, R., Vincentelli, J., Azarkan, M. & Looze, Y. (2001). Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 556-570.]; Azarkan et al., 2004[Azarkan, M., Wintjens, R., Looze, Y. & Baeyens-Volant, D. (2004). Phytochemistry, 65, 525-534.]). Furthermore, QCs from plants and animals seem to belong to two distinct protein families (Dahl et al., 2000[Dahl, S. W., Slaughter, C., Lauritzen, C., Bateman, R. C. Jr, Connerton, I. & Pedersen, J. (2000). Protein Expr. Purif. 20, 27-36.]; Schilling et al., 2003[Schilling, S., Manhart, S., Hoffmann, T., Ludwig, H.-H., Wasternack, C. & Demuth, H.-U. (2003). Biol. Chem. 384, 1583-1592.]) with no sequence homology between them.

The mature papaya glutaminyl cyclase (PQC) is a monomeric glycoprotein of 266 amino acids with a molecular weight of 32 980 Da (Pohl et al., 1991[Pohl, T., Zimmer, M., Mugele, K. & Spiess, J. (1991). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10059-10063.]; Zerhouni et al., 1998[Zerhouni, S., Amrani, A., Nijs, M., Smolders, N., Azarkan, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1998). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1387, 275-290.]), exhibiting a remarkable resistance to chemical and thermal denaturation (Zerhouni et al., 1998[Zerhouni, S., Amrani, A., Nijs, M., Smolders, N., Azarkan, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1998). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1387, 275-290.]), as well as to enzymatic proteolysis (Oberg et al., 1998[Oberg, K. A., Ruysschaert, J.-M., Azarkan, M., Smolders, N., Zerhouni, S., Wintjens, R., Amrani, A. & Looze, Y. (1998). Eur. J. Biochem. 258, 214-222.]).

In order to elucidate the enzymatic mechanism of PQC and to gain further insights into the structural determinants underlying its exceptional stability, we have initiated the determination of its three-dimensional structure by X-ray crystallography. We report here the crystallization and preliminary X-ray study of the glutaminyl cyclase isolated from C. papaya latex. So far, no structure of a glutaminyl cyclase has been reported.

2. Purification

Glutaminyl cyclase was purified from C. papaya latex following a procedure derived from that previously reported by Zerhouni et al. (1998[Zerhouni, S., Amrani, A., Nijs, M., Smolders, N., Azarkan, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1998). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1387, 275-290.]) and Azarkan et al. (2003[Azarkan, M., El Moussaoui, A., van Wuytswinkel, D., Dehon, G. & Looze, Y. (2003). J. Chromatogr. B, 790, 229-238.], 2004[Azarkan, M., Wintjens, R., Looze, Y. & Baeyens-Volant, D. (2004). Phytochemistry, 65, 525-534.]). In order to purify PQC, the soluble fraction of the collected plant latex was fractionated by ion-exchange chromatography on an SP-Sepharose Fast Flow column followed by hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Fractogel EMD Propyl 650 (S). The elution media and chromatographic conditions are described in detail in Azarkan et al. (2004[Azarkan, M., Wintjens, R., Looze, Y. & Baeyens-Volant, D. (2004). Phytochemistry, 65, 525-534.]). Prior to crystallization, the enzyme was further purified using thiophilic interaction chromatography. The chromatographic support was prepared by activation of Biogel A 0.5m with divinyl sulfone and subsequent treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol (Hansen et al., 1998[Hansen, P., Scoble, J. A., Hanson, B. & Hoogenraad, N. J. (1998). J. Immunol. Methods, 215, 1-7.]). The chromatographic conditions in this last purification step are identical to those used to perform the hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Fractogel EMD Propyl 650 (S). The purity of the protein was estimated to be higher than 98% by SDS–PAGE using silver staining.

Prior to crystallization, the protein was exhaustively dialyzed against ultrapure water and concentrated to 31.4 mg ml−1 on a 10 000 MWCO Vivaspin 15R concentrator (Sartorius). The protein concentration was determined at 280 nm using a calculated extinction coefficient of 55 190 M−1 cm−1 (Gill & von Hippel, 1989[Gill, S. C. & von Hippel, P. H. (1989). Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326.]).

3. Crystallization

All crystallization experiments were performed using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 293 K. Initial crystals of PQC were grown in 3–4 d from 3 µl drops containing equal volumes of protein (31.4 mg ml−1 in water) and reservoir solution consisting of Cryokit (Sigma) solution No. 22. This condition was optimized and crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were grown from 3 µl drops containing equal volumes of protein and reservoir solution [85 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 0.17 M sodium acetate, 25%(w/v) PEG 4000 and 15%(v/v) glycerol] (Fig. 1[link]). Crystals were mounted in cryoloops (Hampton Research) and flash-cooled by direct immersion into liquid nitrogen prior to X-ray diffraction analysis.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Representative crystal of papaya glutaminyl cyclase.

4. X-ray analysis

Diffraction data were initially collected in-house with a MAR345 imaging-plate system using Cu Kα radiation generated by a Bruker–Nonius FR591 rotating-anode generator equipped with Osmic mirrors. Data were collected in 140 images with a crystal-to-detector distance of 175 mm and 1° oscillation per image. Diffraction data were processed and scaled using the XDS suite of programs (Kabsch, 1993[Kabsch, W. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 795-800.]). The PQC crystals belong to the orthorhombic space group P212121, with unit-cell parameters a = 64.94, b = 83.51, c = 112.75 Å, and diffract at least to 2 Å resolution. The data-collection statistics are summarized in Table 1[link]. Based on the molecular weight of PQC (33 kDa) and space group P212121, it is assumed that the crystal contains two molecules per asymmetric unit. This assumption gives a VM value (Matthews, 1968[Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497.]) of 2.1 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 41%.

Table 1
Data-collection statistics

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

X-ray source Rotating anode BM14 ESRF
Wavelength (Å) 1.5418 0.953718
Space group P212121 P212121
Unit-cell parameters    
a (Å) 64.94 62.82
b (Å) 83.51 81.23
c (Å) 112.75 108.17
Resolution range (Å) 30.0–2.04 (2.16–2.04) 30.0–1.70 (1.80–1.70)
Observed reflections 205637 (30011) 448581 (71180)
Unique reflections 39369 (6092) 61546 (9753)
Rmerge (%) 3.7 (13.5) 5.5 (24.0)
Completeness (%) 99.2 (97.2) 99.8 (99.6)
I/σ(I) 27.1 (11.3) 22.2 (7.4)
I > 3σ(I) (%) 91.2 (80.6) 87.4 (66.0)

Higher resolution diffraction data were collected on beamline BM14 at the ESRF. Data were collected in 180 images on a MAR CCD 225 mm detector with a crystal-to-detector distance of 150 mm and an exposure time per frame of 20 s. Intensity data were collected to a resolution of 1.7 Å at 100 K using a wavelength of 0.953718 Å with 1° oscillation per image. Diffraction data were processed and scaled using XDS. Data-collection statistics are summarized in Table 1[link]. So far, there is no structure of a homologous protein available for molecular-replacement phasing. Therefore, structure determination by the multiple isomorphous replacement method is currently being undertaken.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by CNRS and the Région Nord-Pas de Calais. YL and RW gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Communauté Française de Belgique through Action de Recherche Concertée Grant 02/07-289. VV is a recipient of an ATIP Jeunes Chercheurs grant from the CNRS.

References

First citationAmrani, A., Wintjens, R., Zerhouni, S., Azarkan, M., Nijs, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1997). Rec. Res. Dev. Phytochem. 1, 25–37.  Google Scholar
First citationAzarkan, M., Amrani, A., Zerhouni, S., Oberg, K. A., Ruysschaert, J.-M., Wintjens, R. & Looze, Y. (2002). Biopolymers, 65, 325–335.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationAzarkan, M., El Moussaoui, A., van Wuytswinkel, D., Dehon, G. & Looze, Y. (2003). J. Chromatogr. B, 790, 229–238.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationAzarkan, M., Wintjens, R., Looze, Y. & Baeyens-Volant, D. (2004). Phytochemistry, 65, 525–534.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBateman, R. C. Jr, Temple, J. S., Misquitta, S. A. & Booth, R. E. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 11246–11250.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBockers, T. M., Kreutz, M. R. & Pohl, T. (1995). J. Neuroendocrinol. 7, 445–453.  CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBusby, W. H. J., Quackenbush, G. E., Humm, J., Youngblood, W. W. & Kizer, J. S. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8532–8536.  CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationDahl, S. W., Slaughter, C., Lauritzen, C., Bateman, R. C. Jr, Connerton, I. & Pedersen, J. (2000). Protein Expr. Purif. 20, 27–36.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationEl Moussaoui, A., Nijs, M., Paul, C., Wintjens, R., Vincentelli, J., Azarkan, M. & Looze, Y. (2001). Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 556–570.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationFisher, W. H. & Spiess, J. (1987). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 3628–3632.  PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGill, S. C. & von Hippel, P. H. (1989). Anal. Biochem. 182, 319–326.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationHansen, P., Scoble, J. A., Hanson, B. & Hoogenraad, N. J. (1998). J. Immunol. Methods, 215, 1–7.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKabsch, W. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 795–800.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMatthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMesser, M. (1963). Nature (London), 197, 1299.  CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMesser, M. & Ottesen, M. (1965). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 92, 409–411.  Google Scholar
First citationOberg, K. A., Ruysschaert, J.-M., Azarkan, M., Smolders, N., Zerhouni, S., Wintjens, R., Amrani, A. & Looze, Y. (1998). Eur. J. Biochem. 258, 214–222.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationPohl, T., Zimmer, M., Mugele, K. & Spiess, J. (1991). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10059–10063.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSchilling, S., Manhart, S., Hoffmann, T., Ludwig, H.-H., Wasternack, C. & Demuth, H.-U. (2003). Biol. Chem. 384, 1583–1592.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationSong, I., Chuang, C. Z. & Bateman, R. C. Jr (1994). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 77–86.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSykes, P. A., Watson, S. J., Temple, J. S. & Bateman, R. C. Jr (1999). FEBS Lett. 455, 159–161.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWetsel, W. C., Liposits, Z., Seidah, N. G. & Collins, S. (1995). Neuroendocrinology, 62, 166–177.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationZerhouni, S., Amrani, A., Nijs, M., Smolders, N., Azarkan, M., Vincentelli, J. & Looze, Y. (1998). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1387, 275–290.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds