protein structure communications
Sequence-induced trimerization of phospholipase A2: structure of a trimeric isoform of PLA2 from common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) at 2.5 Å resolution
aDepartment of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, and bInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hamburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: tps@aiims.aiims.ac.in
The venom of the common Indian krait (Bungarus caeruleus) contains about a dozen isoforms of phospholipase A2 (PLA2), which exist in different oligomeric forms as well as in complexes with low-molecular-weight ligands. The basic objective of multimerization and complexation is either to inactivate PLA2 in the venom for long-term storage, to generate a new PLA2 function or to make a more lethal assembly. The current isoform was isolated from the venom of B. caeruleus. Dynamic light-scattering studies indicated the presence of a stable trimeric association of this PLA2. Its primary sequence was determined by cDNA cloning. The purified protein was crystallized with 2.8 M NaCl as a precipitating agent using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. The crystals belonged to the monoclinic C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 80.9, b = 80.5, c = 57.1 Å, β = 90.3°. The structure was refined to a final R factor of 0.198. This is a novel trimeric PLA2 structure in which the central pore formed by the association of three molecules is filled with water molecules. The interactions across the pore take place via multiple water bridges primarily to the side chains of Arg, Lys and Thr residues. Approximately 12% of the total solvent-accessible surface area is buried in the core of the trimer. The active sites of all three molecules are located on the surface and are fully exposed to the solvent, resulting in a highly potent enzymatic unit.
Keywords: phospholipase A2; oligomerization; aggregation.
3D view: 1g2x
PDB reference: krait trimer PLA2, 1g2x, r1g2xsf
1. Introduction
Phospholipase A2 (PLA2; EC 3.1.1.4) catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of 1,2-di-acyl-3-sn-phosphoglycerides, releasing and lysophospholipids (van Deenen & de Haas, 1963). These enzymes are widely distributed in the animal world. Recently, PLA2s have also been reported from plants (Stahl et al., 1998, 1999; Kim et al., 1999) and from prokaryotic sources (Sugiyama et al., 2002). In addition to the basic catalytic function, these proteins are also found to possess many pharmacological properties such as neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, myotoxicity, platelet aggregation, anticoagulant effects etc. (Kini & Evans, 1989). These cysteine-rich proteins (ten, 12 or 14 cysteines per sequence) contain between 119 and 134 amino-acid residues. PLA2s from different sources share common qualitative catalytic properties but differ greatly in their pharmacological properties. Following broad classification into extracellular and intracellular types, the secretory enzymes have been further divided into many groups and subgroups mainly based on sequence criteria (Scott & Sigler, 1994). The most extensively studied of these are the group I and group II enzymes, which are highly homologous and share similar kinetic behaviour (Heinrikson, 1991). Group I contains enzymes from mammalian pancreatic species and from Elapidae (cobras) and Hydrophiidae (sea snakes) snake venoms, mammalian exocrine pancreas and human spermatozoa (Langlais et al., 1992), whereas PLA2s from Crotalidae (rattlesnakes and pit vipers), Viperidae (old world vipers), human synovial fluid, a variety of mammalian cell types including platelets, gastric mucosa, neutrophils and vascular endothelium (Kramer et al., 1989; Komada et al., 1989; Kurihara et al., 1991; Rosenthal et al., 1995) belong to group II. Members of the first group possess an S—S bridge between the side chains of Cys11 and Cys80. The enzymes of the second group have a C-terminal extension of five to seven residues including a C-terminal Cys residue linked to the SH group of residue 50. The other six disulfide bridges are conserved in proteins from both groups.
The current PLA2 from Bungarus caeruleus belongs to group I. Of all known PLA2 structures, only two other trimeric structures, those of PLA2s from Naja naja naja (Fremont et al., 1993; Segelke et al., 1998) and N. naja kaouthia (Gu et al., 2002), have been determined so far. Here, we report the of a novel trimer of PLA2 from B. caeruleus at 2.5 Å resolution.
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Purification of PLA2
Lyophilized B. caeruleus venom was obtained from Irula cooperative snake farm, Tamil Nadu, India and purified as reported previously (Singh et al., 2001). 1 g of venom was dissolved in deionized water to a concentration of 50 mg ml−1. This was centrifuged at 8000g for 15 min to remove insoluble material. The supernatant was applied to a CM-Sephadex C-25 cation-exchanger (60 × 1 cm) that had been equilibrated with 0.05 M ammonium acetate pH 5.0 at 277 K. Proteins adsorbed on the column were eluted with a linear gradient of ammonium acetate from 0.05 M at pH 5.0 to 0.5 M at pH 7.0. The purified PLA2 samples were pooled and lyophilized.
2.2. Dynamic light scattering
The sample solutions for the experiment were prepared in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 8.0 made with deionized water from a Millipore Alpha-Q system. The samples were filtered through 0.1 µm polyvinylidene difluoride filters (Millipore). The enzyme concentration varied from 5.0 to 15.0 mg ml−1. Samples were manually injected into a flow cell (30 µl) and illuminated by a 30 mW, 660 nm laser diode. The dynamic light-scattering (DLS) data were collected in quintuplicate using a Spectroscatter 201 (RiNA Netzwerk RNA-Technologien, Berlin, Germany) laser at a temperature of 303 K and the results were analyzed with Xmgr v. 3.01 software (Turner, 1991).
2.3. Sequence determination
B. caeruleus venom glands were obtained from Irula Snake Catchers Cooperative Society, Chennai with the permission of the Government of Tamil Nadu. The minced glands were stored in 4 M guanidine isothiocyanate solution at 203 K prior to use. The tissues were homogenized in a Polytron (Kinematica, Switzerland) homogenizer. The total RNA was extracted with an equal volume of a 1:1 phenol–chloroform mixture. Quantification of RNA was performed spectrophotometrically. 10 µg total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using Revert Aid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (MBI, Lithuania) and oligo-(dT)18 primer MBI. The conserved nucleotide sequences of group I PLA2s were used for construction of primers. The 5′ AAA TGT ATC CTG CTC ACC TTC T 3′ and 5′ GCT GAA GCC TCT CAA ATA TCA T 3′ were used as forward and reverse primers in PCR amplification using a PTC 100 thermocycler (MJ Research, USA). The amplified product of 464 bp was cloned in a pGEMT (Promega, USA) vector. Automated DNA sequencing of the insert was performed with an ABI-377 sequencer (ABI Biosystems, USA). Both strands were sequenced. The cDNA reported here comprises an ORF encoding 147 amino acids and a 3′ UTR of 18 bp. The sequence was submitted to GenBank (accession No. AY455756).
2.4. Crystallization of PLA2
Crystals of PLA2 were obtained using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. The protein sample was dissolved at 5 mg ml−1 in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 8.5 containing 1.4 M NaCl, 1 mM NaN3. It was equilibrated against the same buffer containing 2.8 M NaCl. After 3 d incubation at 281 K, crystals had grown to about 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm in size.
2.5. data collection
The crystals diffracted to 2.5 Å resolution. The data were collected on EMBL beamline X-11 at DESY, Hamburg with λ = 0.98 Å using a MAR 345 imaging-plate scanner with 1.0° rotation for each image. A single crystal was mounted in a nylon loop and flash-cooled in a nitrogen stream at 100 K using 15% glycerol in reservoir buffer. The data were processed with DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). The results of data collection and processing are given in Table 1.
‡G factor as reported by PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993). |
2.6. Structure determination
The structure was solved by AMoRe program (Navaza, 1994) from the CCP4 software suite (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994; Dodson et al., 1997) and with the structure of the monomeric isoform of krait PLA2 as a model (PDB code 1fe5 ; Singh et al., 2001). The rotation function was calculated with diffraction data from 10 to 4.5 Å resolution within a sphere radius of 14 Å. The first three peaks in the output appeared as distinct solutions in the rotation function. These peaks grew more distinct in the translation calculations, with an overall of 34.3% and an R factor of 49.9%. Rigid-body further improved the to 42.0% with an R factor of 46.2%.
with the2.7. Structure refinement
The solution was applied to model coordinates with LSQKAB (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994) and they were used as the starting model for in the CNS package (Brünger et al., 1998). The reflections were treated as two data sets, one data set consisting of 5% of the reflections (637 reflections) which were randomly selected for free R calculations (Brünger, 1992) and the other set consisting of the remaining data (12 108 reflections). During the bond lengths and bond angles were restrained to be close to standard values; restraints were also placed on the planarity of groups and non-bonded contacts as defined by Engh & Huber (1991). Several cycles of by rigid-body conjugate-gradient minimization, simulated-annealing and model building with the program O (Jones et al., 1991) lowered the R factor to 0.30 and Rfree to 0.415 for all data in the resolution range 20.0–2.5 Å. At this stage, individual isotropic B-factor was carried out, which reduced the R factor to 0.260 and Rfree to 0.334. Manual model building into |2Fo − Fc| and |Fo − Fc| electron-density maps and further by simulated annealing following a slow-cooling protocol from 3000 to 300 K (Brünger et al., 1990) lowered the R factor to 0.234 and Rfree to 0.321 for reflections in the resolution range 20.0–2.5 Å. Water molecules were included in the model provided that the peaks were greater than 2.5σ in |Fo − Fc| maps and that the waters had hydrogen-bonding partners with appropriate distance and angle geometry and had B values less than 50 Å2 after The improved the map and enabled the addition of further water molecules. After each set of cycles, |2Fo − Fc| and |Fo −Fc| maps were calculated using MAPMAN (Kleywegt & Jones, 1996) and corrections to the side-chain orientations were made in O (Jones et al., 1991) on a Silicon Graphics Indigo-2 workstation. The model was checked by calculating a series of omit maps at each stage of An omit map calculated without channel water molecules or the side chains of residues Thr47, Ala85, Lys88 and Arg95, which are oriented towards the core of the trimeric channel, is shown in Fig. 1.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Sequence of PLA2
In order to distinguish it from other PLA2 trimers, the present PLA2 trimer will be referred to as the krait trimer in all subsequent comparisons. The cDNA reported here consists of an ORF of 441 coding for 147 amino acids and a 3′ UTR of 18 bp including the stop codon (Fig. 2). The krait trimer isoform of PLA2 shows a high sequence identity, ranging from 74 to 85%, with previously reported PLA2s from the same venom (GenBank accession codes AY455754, AF297663 and AY455755). The sequence identity with other group I PLA2s varies from 50 to 83%, but the sequence identity with group II PLA2s is comparatively low, with values ranging from 29 to 56% (Kini, 1997). The only other trimer of PLA2 with known coordinates and primary sequence is the cobra trimer (Fremont et al., 1993). It is of great interest to examine the sequence differences between two trimers. The most critical differences between the sequences of krait trimeric PLA2 and cobra trimeric PLA2 that might have a bearing in their association correspond to the residues at positions 24, 46, 47, 75, 80, 81, 82 and 88. The amino acids in these positions have interactions that differ between the two structures.
3.2. PLA2 trimer
The DLS experiments carried out in the protein concentration range 5.0–15.0 mg ml−1 showed a mean hydrodynamic radius (RH) of 2.99 nm for krait PLA2, which corresponds to a molecular weight of approximately 42 kDa (Turner, 1991). This indicates the presence of a trimer in the solution state. Since the polydispersity value in these estimations is below 15% of the average radius, all PLA2 molecules in solution exist in the trimeric form.
3.3. Overall structure
The final model consists of 2694 protein atoms from three molecules of krait PLA2 designated A, B and C, and 261 water O atoms. The accuracy of the model of PLA2 was checked during by calculations of electron-density maps with |Fo − Fc| coefficients and with selected parts of the molecule deleted from the atomic model used for structure-factor calculations. The final |2Fo − Fc| electron-density map represents continuous and well defined density for the backbone as well for the side chains. The overall B factor for the structure was 29.2 Å2. was completed satisfactorily and the final model is of good stereochemical quality (Table 1). A Ramachandran plot of the main-chain torsion angles (φ, ψ) (Ramachandran & Sasisekharan, 1968) calculated using PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993) showed that 89.4% of the residues were found in the most allowed regions and that the remaining residues were located in additionally allowed regions, with none in the generously allowed or disallowed regions.
The molecular topology of PLA2 conserves all the main features of the PLA2 folding. The N-terminal helix (H1) runs from residue 2 to residue 12. Helix 2 (H2) extends from residue 40 to residue 55, while helix 3 (H3) spans residues 85–103. The structure also contains a double-stranded antiparallel β-sheet designated the β-wing (residues 70–73 and 76–79). There are two helical turns involving residues 19–22 (SH4) and 108–110 (SH5) (Fig. 1). The backbone conformations of molecules A, B and C are essentially identical; the displacement of the Cα trace between the pairs of monomers is less than 0.4 Å. Least-squares superpositions of the Cα atoms of the present structure on equivalent Cα atoms of group I and group II PLA2s (Kini, 1997) show r.m.s. shifts of 0.44–1.15 and 0.64–1.33 Å, respectively.
3.4. Trimeric association
Molecules A, B and C of krait PLA2 form a symmetrical trimer (Fig. 1). The rotations between molecules A and B, B and C, and C and A are of the order of 120°, indicating the presence of a threefold non-crystallographic rotation axis. The molecules aggregate in such a way that the active sites of all three are accessible from the surface through hydrophobic channels with unhindered openings (Fig. 3a). The antiparallel helices H2 and H3 from the three monomers form the inner walls of an internal solvent channel in the trimeric structure (Fig. 1). The interior of this solvent channel is filled with water molecules. A number of well ordered water molecules are present in this trimeric pore and are involved in multiple hydrogen bonds with protein residues. The most prominent amino-acid residues that participate in these interactions are Thr47, Ala85, Lys88 and Arg95 (Fig. 1), showing that the core of the trimeric channel is primarily occupied by basic amino acids. The overall length of the solvent pore in this trimer is approximately 28 Å long, with a width varying between 13 and 17 Å. The buried area in the interface is of the order of 12% (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994) of the total surface area of the trimer. There are at least 26 interactions between the adjacent molecules of the trimer. These involve direct links between protein atoms, consisting of 14 side chain–main chain interactions and 12 side chain–side chain interactions (Table 2). It is noteworthy that only a few solvent molecules are observed between the subunits.
|
3.5. Comparisons with other homotrimers
So far, five crystal structures of PLA2 homotrimers have been reported. These include three essentially identical structures from N. naja naja (Fremont et al., 1993; Segelke et al., 1998), of which one contains Ca2+ and the other two do not. In the following, the structure containing Ca2+ will be used for comparison and will be referred to as cobra trimer. The two other structures (the same protein in two different space groups) are from N. naja kaouthia (a different subspecies; Gu et al., 2002; PDB files for these structures are not available). The trimeric structure from N. naja kaouthia will be referred to as kaouthia trimer. The overall trimeric association as well as the intersubunit contacts are strikingly different in these structures, although the dimensions of the cavity are similar in the three cases. The interior of the krait trimer is filled with solvent molecules linking Thr47, Ala85, Lys88 and Arg95 via water bridges across the trimeric pore. In contrast, the trimeric channel in cobra PLA2 is predominantly occupied by hydrophobic residues such as Tyr3, Trp20 and Trp67 and solvent molecules are completely absent. Similarly, the trimeric cavity in kaothia PLA2 is also filled with hydrophobic residues such as Leu2, Tyr3, Trp18, Trp19, Ala22, Leu63 and Phe64. Another striking difference corresponds to the location of the active sites. In the krait structure the hydrophobic channel opens to the outward surface of the monomeric units, while in the cobra trimer the active sites and hydrophobic channels are situated near the centre of the pore (Fig. 3b). Similarly, the entrances to the hydrophobic channels in kaouthia PLA2 open into the trimer cavity. Furthermore, the contacts between adjacent monomers in the krait trimer are predominantly through hydrogen bonds involving residues Thr36, Tyr46, Glu54, Thr73, Glu74, Thr78, Cys79 and Thr82 (Fig. 4a). The interactions between adjacent monomers in the cobra trimer are primarily electrostatic and the residues involved are Tyr3, Lys6, Asp24, Arg31, Glu56, Asn119, Asp121 and Lys123 (Fig. 4b). In the kaouthia trimer, the intersubunit interactions include both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.
3.6. of PLA2
In krait PLA2, the three catalytic residues His48, Tyr52 and Asp99 together with Asp49 display a stereochemistry that conforms ideally to that of the so-called `catalytic network', a system of hydrogen bonds involving the catalytic residues (Verheij et al., 1980). The side chains of His48, Tyr52 and Asp99 are directly bonded to each other, while that of Asp49 interacts with His48 through a water molecule. This unique water molecule is required for The side chains of the active-site residues do not show appreciable deviations when superimposed on the active-site residues of the monomeric isoform of krait PLA2 (Singh et al., 2001). The active sites of all the monomeric units in the krait trimer are fully accessible from the surface, thus suggesting little change in the catalytic activities of the individual subunits. Therefore, the krait trimer as a unit presents three equivalent catalytic sites, making it a highly efficient arrangement. This is in striking contrast to both cobra and kaouthia trimers, whose active sites are found to be largely hindered in the trimeric arrangements.
3.7. Ca2+-binding loop
In the calcium-binding loop of the krait trimer, one water molecule is present in each monomer. The conformations of the calcium-binding loops in the all three subunits are identical, with an r.m.s. shift of 0.4 Å for the Cα positions. Cα superposition of the calcium-binding loop of monomer A of the krait trimer with monomer A of the cobra trimer (PDB code 1a3f ) gives an r.m.s. shift of 1.3 Å. Large shifts of 1.9, 2.7 and 2.3 Å are observed for residues 31, 32 and 33, respectively. Lys31 is involved in the formation of a salt bridge with residue 24, which is an aspartate in the case of cobra PLA2 trimer and an asparagine in krait PLA2.
3.8. Conclusions
Although PLA2 has been observed to exist in a number of oligomeric forms, little is known about the significance of these oligomeric states with respect to its function. It has been shown that PLA2 undergoes a concentration-dependent aggregation to dimeric or higher order states (Roberts et al., 1977; Deems & Dennis, 1999). It has also been observed that also occurs owing to the presence of specific amino acids at certain sites in the PLA2 sequence. The consequences of are expected to be observable in terms of the stability of the structure and modulation of its function. The manner in which subunits are aligned in krait PLA2 trimer makes it a highly potent unit with three active sites on a highly ordered framework. In contrast, the cobra trimeric form is an inactive form of the enzyme with a considerably enhanced stability (Fremont et al., 1993) and the trimer of kaouthia PLA2 (Gu et al., 2002) is a partially active state. These novel oligomeric states either promote or inhibit the catalytic activities of PLA2, but all of them represent more stable forms than their monomeric structures.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi under the FIST program. GS thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for the award of a fellowship.
References
Brünger, A. T. (1992). Nature (London), 355, 472–474. PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, N., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905–921. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brünger, A. T., Krukowski, A. & Erickson, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 585–593. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Deems, R. A. & Dennis, E. A. (1999). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 366, 177–182. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Deenen, L. L. M. van & de Haas, G. H. (1963). Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 70, 538–553. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dodson, E. J., Winn, M. & Ralph, A. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 620–633. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Engh, R. A. & Huber, R. (1991). Acta Cryst. A47, 392–400. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Esnouf, R. M. (1997). J. Mol. Graph. 15, 132–134. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fremont, D. H., Anderson, D. H., Wilson, I. A., Dennis, E. A. & Xuong, N.-H. (1993). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 342–346. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Gu, L., Wang, Z., Song, S., Shu, Y. & Lin, Z. (2002). Toxicon, 40, 917–922. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Heinrikson, R. L. (1991). Methods Enzymol. 197, 201–214. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jones, T. A., Zou, J., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. A47, 110–119. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Chung, Y. S., Ok, S. H., Lee, S. G., Chung, W. I., Kim, I. Y. & Shin, J. S. (1999). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1489, 389–392. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kini, R. M. (1997). Venom Phospholipase A2 Enzymes: Structure, Function and Mechanism, pp. 146–147. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Kini, R. M. & Evans, H. J. (1989). Toxicon, 27, 613–635. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Kleywegt, G. J. & Jones, T. A. (1996). Acta Cryst. D52, 826–828. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Komada, M., Kudo, I., Mizushima, H., Kitamura, N. & Inoue, K. (1989). J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 106, 545–547. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., Hession, C., Johansen, B., Hayes, G., McGray, P., Chow, E. P., Tizard, R. & Pepinsky, R. B. (1989). J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5768–577. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Kraulis, P. J. (1991). J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 946–950. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kurihara, H., Nakano, T., Takasu, N. & Arita, H. (1991). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1082, 285–292. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Langlais, J., Chafouleas, J. G., Ingraham, R., Vigneault, N. & Roberts, K. D. (1992). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 182, 208–214. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Laskowski, R., MacArthur, M., Moss, D. & Thornton, J. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 283–290. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Merritt, E. A. & Murphy, M. E. P. (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 869–873. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Navaza, J. (1994). Acta Cryst. A50, 157–163. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ramachandran, G. N. & Sasisekharan, V. (1968). Adv. Protein. Chem. 23, 283–438. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Roberts, M. F., Deems, R. A. & Dennis, E. A. (1977). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 1950–1954. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. D., Gordon, M. N., Buescher, E. S., Slusser, J. H., Harris, L. K. & Franson, R. C. (1995). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 208, 650–656. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Segelke, B. W., Nguyen, D., Chee, R., Xuong, N.-H. & Dennis, E. A. (1998). J. Mol. Biol. 279, 223–232. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scott, D. L. & Sigler, P. B. (1994). Adv. Protein Chem. 45, 53–88. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Singh, G., Gourinath, S., Sharma, S., Paramasivam, M., Srinivasan, A. & Singh, T. P. (2001). J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1049–1059. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Stahl, U., Ek, B. & Stymme, S. (1998). Plant Physiol. 117, 197–205. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stahl, U., Lee, M., Sjodahl, S., Archer, D., Cellini, F., Ek, B., Iannacone, R., MacKenzie, D., Semeraro, L., Tramontano, E. & Stymme, S. (1999). Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 481–490. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sugiyama, M., Ohtani, K., Izuhara, M., Koike, T., Suzuki, K., Imamura, S. & Misaki, H. (2002). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20051–20058. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Turner, P. J. (1991). Xmgr v. 3.01. A plotting tool for workstations using X/Motif. https://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Xmgr/ . Google Scholar
Verheij, H. M., Volwerk, J. J., Jansen, E. H. J. M., Puijk, W. C., Dijkstra, B. W., Drenth, J. & de Haas, G. H. (1980). Biochemistry, 19, 743–750. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.