crystallization communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Crystallization and preliminary diffraction analysis of a group I ribozyme from bacteriophage Twort

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Biochemistry, Purdue University, 175 South University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: barbgolden@purdue.edu

(Received 25 August 2004; accepted 3 November 2004; online 9 November 2004)

Group I introns are catalytic RNAs that are capable of performing a variety of phosphotransesterification reactions including self-splicing and RNA cleavage. The reactions are efficient, accurate and dependent only on the presence of guanosine-nucleotide substrate and sufficient magnesium ion to stabilize the structure of the RNA. To understand how the group I intron active-site facilitates catalysis, crystals of a 242-nucleotide ribozyme bound to a four-nucleotide product RNA have been produced that diffract to 3.6 Å resolution. The space group of these crystals is I212121 and the unit-cell parameters are a = 94.6, b = 141.0, c = 210.9 Å. A single heavy-atom derivative has been synthesized by covalent modification of the product RNA with iodine.

1. Introduction

A group I self-splicing intron contains an active site that allows it to excise itself from a precursor RNA and ligate the flanking exons, generating an intact mRNA, tRNA or rRNA (Cech, 1993[Cech, T. R. (1993). Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 229-234.]; Kruger et al., 1982[Kruger, K., Grabowski, P. J., Zaug, A. J., Sands, J., Gottschling, D. E. & Cech, T. R. (1982). Cell, 31, 147-157.]; Saldanha et al., 1993[Saldanha, R., Mohr, G., Belfort, M. & Lambowitz, A. M. (1993). FASEB J. 7, 15-24.]). This self-splicing reaction requires only sufficient magnesium ions (∼2 mM) to fold the RNA and a guanosine-nucleoside substrate (Cech, 1993[Cech, T. R. (1993). Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 229-234.]; Kruger et al., 1982[Kruger, K., Grabowski, P. J., Zaug, A. J., Sands, J., Gottschling, D. E. & Cech, T. R. (1982). Cell, 31, 147-157.]; Saldanha et al., 1993[Saldanha, R., Mohr, G., Belfort, M. & Lambowitz, A. M. (1993). FASEB J. 7, 15-24.]).

The self-splicing reaction is complex, involving the orchestration of two successive transesterification reactions, but it is carried out efficiently and accurately by the group I active site. The intron possesses a binding site capable of recognizing a guanosine nucleoside and activating its 3′ hydroxyl for nucleophilic attack at the 5′ splice site. The 5′ splice-site phosphate follows a uridine recognized in the context of a U·G wobble pair within the hairpin duplex at the 5′ end of the intron (P1). Attack of the activated guanosine nucleophile at the 5′ splice site liberates the 5′ exon and links the guanosine substrate to the 5′ end of the intron. A structural rearrangement must then occur, in which the exogenous guanosine exits the active site and is replaced by a conserved guanosine (ωG) at the 3′ terminus of the intron (Been & Perrotta, 1991[Been, M. D. & Perrotta, A. T. (1991). Science, 252, 434-437.]; Michel et al., 1989[Michel, F., Hanna, M., Green, R., Bartel, D. P. & Szostak, J. W. (1989). Nature (London), 342, 391-395.]). The 5′ exon can then attack at the 3′ splice site in a transesterification reaction that is chemically equivalent to the reverse of the first step of splicing. This reaction ligates the two exons and releases the group I intron.

Group I introns can easily be converted into trans-acting ribozymes. Such molecules are capable of recognizing an RNA substrate by base-pairing and activating the 3′ hydroxyl of a guanosine nucleoside or ωG for nucleophilic cleavage of the substrate (Zaug et al., 1988[Zaug, A. J., Grosshans, C. A. & Cech, T. R. (1988). Biochemistry, 27, 8924-8931.]). Ribozymes such as this have been used to extensively characterize the endonuclease reaction of group I RNAs (Herschlag & Cech, 1990[Herschlag, D. & Cech, T. R. (1990). Biochemistry, 29, 10159-10171.]; Shan et al., 2001[Shan, S., Kravchuk, A. V., Piccirilli, J. A. & Herschlag, D. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 5161-5171.]).

Group I introns possess conserved core elements of secondary structure (designated P1–P9 in Fig. 1[link]a) organized into three domains, P1–P2, P4–P6 and P3–P9 (Cech et al., 1994[Cech, T. R., Damberger, S. H. & Gutell, R. R. (1994). Nature Struct. Biol. 1, 273-280.]). The active site is located at the junction of the P4–P6 and P3–P9 domains. To generate a picture of these widespread RNA machines, crystal structures of the P4–P6 domain from the 413-nucleotide Tetrahymena group I intron (Cate et al., 1996[Cate, J. H., Gooding, A. R., Podell, E., Zhou, K. H., Golden, B. L., Kundrot, C. E., Cech, T. R. & Doudna, J. A. (1996). Science, 273, 1678-1685.]; Juneau et al., 2001[Juneau, K., Podell, E., Harrington, D. J. & Cech, T. R. (2001). Structure, 9, 221-231.]) were solved at high resolution and the structure of a 247-nucleotide ribozyme composed of the P4–­P6 and P3–P9 domains was solved at modest resolution (Golden et al., 1998[Golden, B. L., Gooding, A. R., Podell, E. R. & Cech, T. R. (1998). Science, 282, 259-264.]; Guo et al., 2004[Guo, F., Gooding, A. & Cech, T. R. (2004). In the press.]). Additionally, the structure of a small group I intron from Azoarcus tRNAIle in complex with both exons was recently reported (Adams et al., 2004[Adams, P. L., Stahley, M. R., Kosek, A. B., Wang, J. & Strobel, S. A. (2004). Nature (London), 430, 45-50.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
(a) Twort ribozyme–product complex. Secondary-structure diagram of the Twort ribozyme (black) bound to a four-nucleotide product (gray). The 5′ and 3′ ends of the chains are indicated. Thin lines indicate Watson–Crick base pairs and G·U wobble base pairs are indicated by dots. (b) An orthorhombic crystal of the Twort ribozyme–product complex. This crystal is 0.2–0.3 mm in each dimension.

We are now investigating a 242-nucleotide ribozyme derived from an intron from the phage Twort (Landthaler & Shub, 1999[Landthaler, M. & Shub, D. A. (1999). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 7005-7010.]). The Twort ribozyme is an active enzyme capable of binding to a four-nucleotide recognition sequence within a single-stranded RNA substrate and promoting site-specific cleavage (H. Kim, E. Chase and B. L. Golden, unpublished results). We have synthesized and crystallized the Twort ribozyme bound to a four-nucleotide product RNA. This complex captures the Twort ribozyme in a catalytic state that is distinct from that observed in the Azoarcus intron structure (Adams et al., 2004[Adams, P. L., Stahley, M. R., Kosek, A. B., Wang, J. & Strobel, S. A. (2004). Nature (London), 430, 45-50.]). The Twort ribozyme complex is unreactive because the scissile phosphate is not present, while the Azoarcus intron was trapped by introduction of deoxyribose at the cleavage site. Thus, the two structures should provide details of the conformational changes that occur during the catalytic cycle. Crystals of the Twort ribozyme diffract X-rays to at least 3.6 Å resolution, are suitable for structure determination and can be derivatized by covalent modification of the product RNA.

2. Methods

2.1. Constructs

The gene encoding the Twort ribozyme was amplified by PCR from a subclone containing orf142-I2 from phage Twort (kindly supplied by M. Landthaler and D. A. Shub). The primers (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA) were 5′-TAGCATAAGCTTAATACGACTCACTATAGAGCCTTTATACAGTAATGTA and 5′-CTAGCTTCTAGACTCTTCACAATTATGTTACGGATAGGTT.

The resulting PCR product contained a T7 promotor, residues 9–­252 of the orf142-I2 intron, an EarI restriction-endonuclease recognition site for runoff transcription reactions and HindIII and XbaI recognition sites for cloning. The second nucleotide of the ribozyme was switched from a U to an A to facilitate transcription of the RNA. The L5 loop was also converted to a GAGA tetraloop to promote crystallization. The PCR product was directionally cloned into the polylinker of pUC-19.

2.2. RNA synthesis

The plasmid template was isolated from Escherichia coli strain XL-­1 Blue using QiaFilter plasmid-isolation kits (Qiagen). The plasmid was restricted with EarI restriction endonuclease and protein contaminants were removed by phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1 by volume) extraction, chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.

Ribozyme was synthesized by in vitro transcription. Typical reactions contained 20 µg ml−1 plasmid template, 0.1 mg ml−1 T7 RNA polymerase (recombinant protein purified from an overexpressing strain), 2 mM each of ATP, CTP, GTP and UTP, 40 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT and 2 mM spermidine. Reactions were incubated at 310 K for 1–3 h. Sufficient EDTA was then added to the reactions to chelate the Mg2+ and to reverse the precipitation of magnesium pyrophosphate. The RNA was then recovered by ethanol precipitation.

The ribozyme was purified by denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using 3 mm spacers. The region of the gel containing the full-length ribozyme was identified by UV shadowing, excised and crushed by extrusion through a syringe. The RNA was extracted from the crushed gel matrix by soaking in TEN (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl) overnight. Remaining polyacrylamide was removed from the RNA solution by centrifugation and filtration using a 0.2 µm filter. RNA was precipitated from the TEN solution by the addition of three volumes of ice-cold ethanol and recovered by centrifugation. The RNA was then resuspended in 5 mM potassium cacodylate pH 6.0 and a Centricon concentrator was used to further exchange the buffer and to concentrate the ribozyme for crystallization. The ribozyme was stored at 253 K.

A four-nucleotide RNA, GCUU, and a modified RNA with a 5-­iodouridine, GC(5iU)U, were purchased from Dharmacon Research, Inc, Lafayette, CO, USA.

2.3. Crystallization

To prepare the RNA for crystallization trials, 0.0626 mM ribozyme was mixed with 0.07 mM product RNA in a buffer containing 15 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM potassium cacodylate. This mixture was heated at 323 K for 5 min and allowed to cool to room temperature on the benchtop to allow proper folding of the ribozyme.

Crystallization conditions were determined by screening using the hanging-drop method. Preliminary crystallization conditions were identified using a 24-condition sparse-matrix designed for screening large RNAs (Golden & Kundrot, 2003[Golden, B. L. & Kundrot, C. E. (2003). J. Struct. Biol. 142, 98-107.]). Crystals were produced by mixing the RNA with 50 mM potassium cacodylate pH 6.5, 0.5 mM spermine and 1.8 M Li2SO4. Well solutions were generated by mixing one volume of the above precipitant with 0.5–0.75 volumes of saturated Li2SO4. Crystals take ∼10 d to grow at 291 K.

Derivative crystals were grown using a product RNA with 5-­iodouridine modification at the third nucleotide. Since 5-iodouridine is photosensitive, the RNA was protected from ambient light during crystallization and data collection.

2.4. Data collection

Prior to data collection, crystals were stabilized in a solution containing 30 mM MgCl2, 50 mM potassium cacodylate pH 6.5, 1 mM spermine and 15%(w/v) xylitol that was saturated with Li2SO4. Following stabilization, the crystals were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Native data were collected at 100 K at beamline BM-8 at the Advanced Photon Source. Derivative data were collected using a rotating-anode generator. Data were processed using HKL2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326.]). CNS was used to merge and scale native and derivative data and to calculate a difference Patterson map (Brünger et al., 1998[Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905-921.]). Data-collection statistics are given in Table 1.[link]

Table 1
Data-collection statistics

Values in parentheses are for the last shell.

  Native Iodine
Space group I212121 I212121
Source NE-CAT Cu Kα
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 94.6, b = 141.0, c = 210.9 a = 94.6, b = 141.2, c = 211.3
Resolution limit (Å) 20.0–3.6 (3.73–3.6) 20–4.5 (4.66–4.5)
Observed reflections 61934 25486
Unique reflections 15937 8238
Completeness (%) 98.0 (99.7) 94.8 (97.8)
Rsym (%) 3.8 (37.2) 7.1 (44.4)
I/σ(I) 34.7 (3.8) 26.4 (3.5)
Mosaic spread 0.816 0.377
Rsym = [\textstyle \sum_{hkl}|I(hkl)_{\rm obs} - \langle I(hkl)\rangle|/][\textstyle \sum_{hkl}I(hkl)_{\rm obs}].

3. Results

We have obtained crystals of a group I ribozyme derived from a self-splicing intron from the bacteriophage Twort (Fig. 1[link]b). Analysis of a dissolved crystal by denaturing PAGE indicates the crystals are composed of full-length ribozyme (not shown). The presence of the product analog was confirmed by 32P labeling of material from a washed crystal (data not shown). The space group of these crystals appears to be I222 or I212121, with unit-cell parameters a = 94.6, b = 141.0, c = 210.9 Å. The Matthews coefficient VM is calculated to be 4.4 Å3 Da−1 if one molecule comprises the asymmetric unit. This value is similar to that observed for crystals of the Tetrahymena group I catalytic core (VM = 4.9 Å3 Da−1; Golden et al., 1997[Golden, B. L., Podell, E. R., Gooding, A. R. & Cech, T. R. (1997). J. Mol. Biol. 270, 711-723.]) and seems to be typical for crystals of large RNAs.

A single iodine derivative was synthesized by cocrystallization of the ribozyme with an iodinated product analog. The difference Patterson map reveals strong peaks (∼10σ) on the Harker sections (Fig. 2[link]). These data resolve the space-group ambiguity, revealing it to be I212121, and the number of peaks in the map is consistent with a single molecule in the asymmetric unit. The quality of the derivative data indicated that the derivative is isomorphous and highly occupied. This result demonstrates the utility of covalent iodine modifications for structural analysis of large (80 kDa) RNAs.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
An iodine derivative. An isomorphous difference Patterson map was calculated using data between 15 and 5.5 Å and the Harker sections were plotted (contoured at a lower level of 4σ and at 0.5σ increments). The peaks correspond to a single iodine site, suggesting that there is a single molecule in the asymmetric unit. The relative positions of the peaks are consistent with space group I212121.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of BioCARS, NE-CAT and SBC for assistance with data collection. This work was supported by NASA (NAG8-­1833), the Pew Scholars Program in Biomedical Sciences and the Purdue University Cancer Center.

References

First citationAdams, P. L., Stahley, M. R., Kosek, A. B., Wang, J. & Strobel, S. A. (2004). Nature (London), 430, 45–50.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBeen, M. D. & Perrotta, A. T. (1991). Science, 252, 434–437.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBrünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905–921.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCate, J. H., Gooding, A. R., Podell, E., Zhou, K. H., Golden, B. L., Kundrot, C. E., Cech, T. R. & Doudna, J. A. (1996). Science, 273, 1678–1685.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCech, T. R. (1993). Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 229–234.  CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCech, T. R., Damberger, S. H. & Gutell, R. R. (1994). Nature Struct. Biol. 1, 273–280.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGolden, B. L., Gooding, A. R., Podell, E. R. & Cech, T. R. (1998). Science, 282, 259–264.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGolden, B. L. & Kundrot, C. E. (2003). J. Struct. Biol. 142, 98–107.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGolden, B. L., Podell, E. R., Gooding, A. R. & Cech, T. R. (1997). J. Mol. Biol. 270, 711–723.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGuo, F., Gooding, A. & Cech, T. R. (2004). In the press.  Google Scholar
First citationHerschlag, D. & Cech, T. R. (1990). Biochemistry, 29, 10159–10171.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationJuneau, K., Podell, E., Harrington, D. J. & Cech, T. R. (2001). Structure, 9, 221–231.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationKruger, K., Grabowski, P. J., Zaug, A. J., Sands, J., Gottschling, D. E. & Cech, T. R. (1982). Cell, 31, 147–157.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationLandthaler, M. & Shub, D. A. (1999). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 7005–7010.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMichel, F., Hanna, M., Green, R., Bartel, D. P. & Szostak, J. W. (1989). Nature (London), 342, 391–395.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSaldanha, R., Mohr, G., Belfort, M. & Lambowitz, A. M. (1993). FASEB J. 7, 15–24.  CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationShan, S., Kravchuk, A. V., Piccirilli, J. A. & Herschlag, D. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 5161–5171.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationZaug, A. J., Grosshans, C. A. & Cech, T. R. (1988). Biochemistry, 27, 8924–8931.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds