crystallization communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic study of a potential metal-dependent hydrolase with cyclase activity from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aState Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, College of Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China, and bResearch Center for Structural Biology, Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, 3-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: qchuang@chem.pku.edu.cn

(Received 17 September 2004; accepted 12 November 2004; online 2 December 2004)

The putative metal-dependent hydrolase gene TTE1006 from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis strain MB4T (T = type strain; Genbank accession No. AE008691) was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli. The 205-amino-acid gene product was purified and crystallized. The crystal used for data collection belongs to space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 85.2, b = 62.1, c = 172.4 Å, β = 104.2°. Using a synchrotron-radiation source, the resolution limit of the data reached 1.87 Å. Eight molecules were estimated to be present in the asymmetric unit, with a solvent content of 48%. Structure determination is ongoing using the multiple-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) method and also the molecular-replacement (MR) method.

1. Introduction

Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis is an extremely thermophilic eubacterium that was isolated from Tengcong hot springs (Yunnan, China). Although T. tengcongensis shares several key features with the genus Thermoanaerobacter, it also displays some interesting phenotypic properties that are not identified with the genus (Xue et al., 2001[Xue, Y.-F., Xu, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, Y.-H. & Zhou, P.-J. (2001). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 1335-1341.]; Fardeau et al., 2004[Fardeau, M.-L., Salinas, M. B., L'Haridon, S., Jeanthon, C., Verhé, F., Cayol, J.-­L., Patel, B. K. C., Garcia, J.-L. & Ollivier, B. (2004). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 467-474.]; Acinas et al., 2004[Acinas, S. G., Marcelino, L. A., Klepac-Ceraj, V. & Polz, M. F. (2004). J. Bacteriol. 186, 2629-2635.]). To understand these contradictions and the molecular mechanisms by which this bacterium has adapted to extreme environments, the complete genomic sequence of T. tengcongensis as well as an analysis of its proteomic profile have recently been reported (Bao et al., 2002[Bao, Q.-Y. et al. (2002). Genome Res. 12, 689-700.]; Wang et al., 2004[Wang, J.-Q., Xue, Y.-F., Feng, X.-L., Li, X.-L., Wang, H., Li, W., Zhao, C.-F., Cheng, X.-J., Ma, Y.-H., Zhou, P.-J., Yin, J. N., Bhatnagar, A., Wang, R. & Liu, S.-Q. (2004). Proteomics, 4, 136-150.]). Other papers have also referred to these mechanisms (Zhang et al., 2003[Zhang, J., Liu, J.-F., Zhou, J., Ren, Y.-Y., Dai, X.-Y. & Xiang, H. (2003). Biotechnol. Lett. 25, 1463-1467.]; Sekowska et al., 2004[Sekowska, A., Dénervaud, V., Ashida, H., Michoud, K., Haas, D., Yokota, A. & Danchin, A. (2004). BMC Microbiol. 4, 9.]; Irving et al., 2002[Irving, J. A., Steenbakkers, P. J. M., Lesk, A. M., Op den Camp, H. J. M., Pike, R. N. & Whisstock, J. C. (2002). Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1881-1890.]).

We have cloned TTE1006, one of the genes from T. tengcongensis MB4T, and overexpressed it in Escherichia coli. The target protein TUH (T. tengcongensis uncharacterized hydrolase) was predicted to be a metal-dependent hydrolase (Bao et al., 2002[Bao, Q.-Y. et al. (2002). Genome Res. 12, 689-700.]). Searching for homologous sequences in data banks using the BLAST program (NCBI; Marchler-Bauer et al., 2003[Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 383-387.]) revealed that TUH has a putative conserved domain (COG1878) and is similar to some uncharacterized Zn2+-dependent polyketide cyclases (Hopwood, 1997[Hopwood, D. A. (1997). Chem. Rev. 97, 2465-2497.]). TUH has high sequence similarity with many ESTs (expressed sequence tags) from Homo sapiens, such as dbEST IDs 8439000 (sequence identity 25%, similarity 41%), 1713471 (sequence identity 25%, similarity 42%), 6101508 (sequence identity 27%, similarity 45%) and 3652714 (sequence identity 36%, similarity 50%) (TBLASTN; Altschul et al., 1997[Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J.-H., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997). Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.]). A recently released 2.5 Å resolution structure of a metal-dependent hydrolase from Bacillus stearothermophilus (PDB code 1r61 ; J. Maderova, D. Borek, D. Tomchick, A. Joachimiak, F. Collart & Z. Otwinowski, unpublished work) has 55% sequence identity and 75% similarity to TUH (Fig. 1[link]), which implies that TUH may adopt a similar structure. The structure determination of TUH to 1.87 Å resolution will provide more detailed information for further functional studies.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Sequence alignment of TUH and 1R61A calculated using ClustalX v.1.83 (Thompson et al., 1997[Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997). Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876-4882.]). Identical amino acids are shown with black backgrounds and similar amino acids with grey backgrounds. 1R61A is the sequence of one of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the structure of a predicted metal-dependent hydrolase from B. stearothermophilus (PDB code 1r6a ).

2. Expression and purification

The TTE1006 gene was cloned into the expression vector pET-21a (Novagen) and TUH was expressed in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) pLys (Novagen). The cells were suspended in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM ZnCl2 and disrupted by sonication. The cell lysate was centrifuged (40 000g) for 30 min at 277 K. The resulting supernatant was kept in a 338 K water bath for 10 min and then centrifuged (40 000g) for 30 min at 277 K. The following procedures were all performed at room temperature. The supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 µm filter and loaded onto a HiTrap Q HP column (5 ml; Amersham Biosciences) pre-equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM bis-Tris–HCl pH 6.5, 10 mM 2-­mercaptoethanol, 1 mM ZnCl2). Protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0.0–1.0 M NaCl in the same buffer. Fractions containing the target protein were pooled and further purified with a HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-200 High-Resolution column (Amersham Biosciences). At each step, the target protein was analyzed by SDS–PAGE with a 12%(w/v) acrylamide gel (Laemmli, 1970[Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Nature (London), 227, 680-685.]). SeMet-substituted TUH was expressed in the auxotrophic E. coli strain B834 (DE3) (Novagen) and purified using a similar procedure.

3. Crystallization

TUH (wild type and SeMet-substituted) was crystallized by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 296 K. The initial screening for the crystallization conditions was performed using the sparse-matrix Crystal Screen I (Hampton Research). Small crystals appeared and the crystallization conditions were optimized. The initial protein concentration was 20 mg ml−1 in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM ZnCl2, 0.02%(w/v) NaN3. Drops were prepared by mixing 1 µl protein solution with 1 µl reservoir solution [0.1 M sodium citrate pH 5.8, 20%(v/v) 2-propanol, 12%(w/v) PEG 4000] and were then equilibrated against 1 ml of the same reservoir solution. Colourless rod-like crystals of WT and SeMet-substituted TUH were obtained after 9 d at 296 K (Fig. 2[link]) with maximum dimensions of 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.70 mm.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystals of SeMet-substituted TUH.

4. Data collection and processing

Crystals of both wild-type (WT) and SeMet-substituted TUH were exposed to X-­ray radiation. Since the WT TUH did not diffract to a resolution higher than 3 Å (data not shown), only the data obtained for the SeMet-substituted protein have been processed and used.

Prior to data collection, a crystal of TUH was soaked in reservoir solution with the addition of 15%(w/v) PEG 4000 for 30 h and was then transferred to a nylon CryoLoop (Hampton Research) and dipped into liquid nitrogen prior to placement in a nitrogen-gas stream at 100 K. Data were collected at beamline BL6A of the Photon Factory at the High Energy Acceleration Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan using an ADSC Quantum 4R CCD camera (Watanabe et al., 1995[Watanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Adachi, S. & Sakabe, N. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1824-1826.]). The values of Δ[f'] and Δ[f''] were determined experimentally with X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy after the mounting of the crystal on the beamline. Three wavelengths were chosen to collect data separately. The oscillation ranges were 180° for the edge and high-energy remote and 360° for the peak wavelengths. Wavelengths were used in the sequence high-energy remote, edge and peak, with the oscillation per frame being 1° in each case. The data were processed using the program HKL2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326.]). Diffraction data statistics are summarized in Table 1[link]. The crystals belonged to the monoclinic space group P21. Assuming the presence of eight molecules of TUH in the asymmetric unit, the value of the Matthews coefficient VM is 2.37 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a solvent content of 48%, both of which are within the normal range of values for protein crystals (Matthews, 1968[Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-493.]). 6 × 8 = 48 selenium positions have been determined by MAD and the structure determination of TUH is currently in progress using the MAD and MR methods, using the structure of a predicted metal-dependent hydrolase from B. stearothermophilus (PDB code 1r6a ) as a search model.

Table 1
Diffraction data statistics of the SeMet-substituted TUH

R.m.s.d.s are given in parentheses; values in square brackets refer to the highest resolution shell.

  High-energy remote Edge Peak
X-ray source Photon Factory, BL6A
Detector ADSC Quantum, 4R CCD
Temperature (K) 100
Space group P21
Unit-cell parameters      
a (Å) 85.24 (1) 85.24 (1) 85.25 (1)
b (Å) 62.06 (2) 62.06 (1) 62.07 (2)
c (Å) 172.36 (2) 172.38 (1) 172.41 (1)
β (°) 104.2 (1) 104.2 (1) 104.2 (1)
X-ray wavelengh (Å) 0.9000 0.97378 0.97885
Resolution range (Å) 50.00–1.87 [1.94–1.87] 50.00–1.87 [1.94–1.87] 50.00–1.87 [1.94–1.87]
Total reflections 514132 [46726] 472907 [27103] 924903 [54409]
Unique reflections 142639 [13743] 138277 [11293] 139925 [11828]
Multiplicity 3.6 [3.4] 3.4 [2.4] 6.6 [4.6]
Rmerge 0.073 [0.302] 0.054 [0.220] 0.068 [0.240]
Completeness (%) 98.5 [95.1] 95.4 [69.7] 95.7 [73.0]
Completeness [I/σ(I) > 2] (%) 90.8 [75.8] 90.3 [59.1] 92.7 [64.4]
I/σ(I)〉 15.6 [3.4] 19.9 [4.2] 26.9 [5.2]
Δ[f']   −8.47 −6.39
Δ[f'']   2.43 3.94
Rmerge = [\textstyle \sum_{hkl}\sum_{i}|I(hkl)_{i} - \langle I(hkl)\rangle |/][\textstyle \sum_{hkl}I(hkl)], where I(hkl)i is the ith measurement of the intensity of reflection hkl and 〈I(hkl)〉 is the mean intensity of reflection hkl.

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Runseng Chen of the Institute of Biophysics Academia Sinica for providing the T. tengcongensis MB4T genomic DNA and help with target selection and Drs Soichi Wakatsuki and Noriyuki Igarash for kind help with data collection at the Photon Factory. This work was supported by grants from the `Structural Genomics' section of the High Technology Development Program of China and the `863 Project of China' to QH and partially by Grants-in-Aid (Nos. 10558109 and 12480181) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to MK.

References

First citationAcinas, S. G., Marcelino, L. A., Klepac-Ceraj, V. & Polz, M. F. (2004). J. Bacteriol. 186, 2629–2635.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationAltschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J.-H., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997). Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBao, Q.-Y. et al. (2002). Genome Res. 12, 689–700.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationFardeau, M.-L., Salinas, M. B., L'Haridon, S., Jeanthon, C., Verhé, F., Cayol, J.-­L., Patel, B. K. C., Garcia, J.-L. & Ollivier, B. (2004). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 467–474.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationHopwood, D. A. (1997). Chem. Rev. 97, 2465–2497.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationIrving, J. A., Steenbakkers, P. J. M., Lesk, A. M., Op den Camp, H. J. M., Pike, R. N. & Whisstock, J. C. (2002). Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1881–1890.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationLaemmli, U. K. (1970). Nature (London), 227, 680–685.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMarchler-Bauer, A. et al. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 383–387.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMatthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–493.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSekowska, A., Dénervaud, V., Ashida, H., Michoud, K., Haas, D., Yokota, A. & Danchin, A. (2004). BMC Microbiol. 4, 9.  Google Scholar
First citationThompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. (1997). Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876–4882.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWang, J.-Q., Xue, Y.-F., Feng, X.-L., Li, X.-L., Wang, H., Li, W., Zhao, C.-F., Cheng, X.-J., Ma, Y.-H., Zhou, P.-J., Yin, J. N., Bhatnagar, A., Wang, R. & Liu, S.-Q. (2004). Proteomics, 4, 136–150.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWatanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Adachi, S. & Sakabe, N. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1824–1826.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationXue, Y.-F., Xu, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, Y.-H. & Zhou, P.-J. (2001). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 1335–1341.  Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhang, J., Liu, J.-F., Zhou, J., Ren, Y.-Y., Dai, X.-Y. & Xiang, H. (2003). Biotechnol. Lett. 25, 1463–1467.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds