crystallization communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Refolding, crystallization and preliminary X-ray structural studies of the West Nile virus envelope (E) protein domain III

aNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 9DU, England, bLaboratory of Structural Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China, and cLaboratory of Molecular Immunology and Molecular Virology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: gaof@im.ac.cn

(Received 24 February 2005; accepted 15 March 2005; online 1 April 2005)

Domain III of the West Nile virus envelope protein, the putative receptor-binding domain, is a major virion-surface determinant for virulence. This protein was reported to be intrinsically unstable and has defied previous crystallization attempts. It has now been purified from inclusion bodies by protein refolding and was crystallized using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 291 K. The crystals belong to space group P2221, with unit-cell parameters a = 52.6, b = 59.7, c = 95.0 Å. A complete data set was collected to 2.8 Å at 100 K with Cu Kα X-rays from a rotating-anode generator.

1. Introduction

West Nile virus (WNV) is a member of the genus Flavivirus from the family Flaviviridae that infects a variety of mammalian and avian hosts, including human beings. It is an emerging virus in the Western hemisphere. The first outbreak in the United States was reported in 1999 in New York and subsequently spread across the country. In 2002, WNV was responsible for the largest outbreak of arthropod-borne encephalitis in the Western hemisphere. In 2003, more than 9800 human cases and 264 deaths were reported (Centers for Disease Control and Protection, 2003[Centers for Disease Control and Protection (2003). West Nile Virus: Surveillance and Control Case Count of West Nile Virus Disease 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount03_detailed.htm.]). There were still more than 2400 cases and 87 deaths in 2004 (Centers for Disease Control and Protection, 2004[Centers for Disease Control and Protection (2004). West Nile Virus: Surveillance and Control Case Count of West Nile Virus Disease 2004. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount04_detailed.htm.]). Flaviviruses produce three structural proteins, with the envelope (E) protein being the major component of the virion surface. All flaviviral E proteins have three domains: I, II and III. It is known that domain III (ED3) of flaviviruses has important implications in virulence. In louping ill virus, dengue virus and WNV, single-amino-acid mutations in this domain disrupt the binding of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (Jiang et al., 1993[Jiang, W. R., Lowe, A., Higgs, S., Reid, H. & Gould, E. A. (1993). J. Gen. Virol. 74, 931-935.]; Gao et al., 1994[Gao, G. F., Hussain, M. H., Reid, H. W. & Gould, E. A. (1994). J. Gen. Virol. 75, 609-614.]; Volk et al., 2004[Volk, D. E., Beasley, D. W., Kallick, D. A., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Gorenstein, D. G. (2004). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38755-38761.]; Modis et al., 2005[Modis, Y., Ogata, S., Clements, D. & Harrison, S. C. (2005). J. Virol. 79, 1223-1231.]). Subsequently, ED3 was proposed to be the receptor-binding domain (Crill & Roehrig, 2001[Crill, W. D. & Roehrig, J. T. (2001). J. Virol. 75, 7769-7773.]; Mandl et al., 2000[Mandl, C. W., Allison, S. L., Holzmann, H., Meixner, T. & Heinz, F. X. (2000). J. Virol. 74, 9601-9609.]) and thus plays a central role in the receptor-mediated endocytotic entry mechanism of flaviviruses (Heinz & Allison, 2000[Heinz, F. X. & Allison, S. L. (2000). Adv. Virus Res. 55, 231-269.]). Comparative structural studies of ED3s might shed light on the general pathogenesis and virulence of this genus of viruses. Owing to their crucial roles in the viral life cycle, the ED3s are attractive targets for drug development. An atomic structure of the ED3 may aid the design of virus-entry inhibitors, for example, by virtual screening. Recently, the solution structure of the ED3 from the New York strain of WNV has been described (Volk et al., 2004[Volk, D. E., Beasley, D. W., Kallick, D. A., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Gorenstein, D. G. (2004). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38755-38761.]). However, structures determined by X-ray crystallography are often more desirable for guiding structure-based drug design and protein-engineering studies because the atomic positions of ordered surface side chains are generally better defined. In the past, the WNV ED3 has defied crystallization, presumably because the protein is intrinsically unstable, as revealed by biophysical comparisons with three other homologous flaviviral ED3s (Yu et al., 2004[Yu, S., Wuu, A., Basu, R., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Lee, J. C. (2004). Biochemistry, 43, 9168-9176.]). We have overcome the production and purification of recombinant WNV ED3 (WNV-rED3) by protein refolding and report here the successful crystallization of this protein.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Protein expression

The DNA encoding WNV-rED3 (residues 298–415) was cloned into the pET11a vector (Novagen) and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21DE3 cells. The recombinant protein was overexpressed in bacteria grown in LB medium containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin at 310 K. When the culture density reached an OD600 of 0.5–0.7, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM to induce expression and the cells were grown for a further 4 h at 310 K. The proteins were expressed as inclusion bodies and prepared as previously described (Gao et al., 1998[Gao, G. F., Gerth, U. C., Wyer, J. R., Willcox, B. E., O'Callaghan, C. A., Zhang, Z., Jones, E. Y., Bell, J. I. & Jakobsen, B. K. (1998). Protein Sci. 7, 1245-1249.]). Cells were harvested by centrifugation and sonicated in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 100–400 µg ml−1 lysozyme, 10% glycerol, 20 µg ml−1 DNAse I). After centrifugation, the pellet was treated with Triton wash buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% sodium azide, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT) and further washed with resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT). The washed inclusion bodies were then dissolved in guanidine buffer (6 M guanidine, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT). The purity of the sample was assessed by SDS–PAGE.

2.2. Protein refolding, purification and mass-spectrometric analysis

Refolding of the recombinant protein was performed at low temperature (277–285 K) in refolding buffer (200 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 M L-arginine, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, 5 mM reduced glutathione, 0.5 mM oxidized glutathione). A total of 60 mg (20 mg each day for 3 d) of sample was added to cold refolding buffer (1 l) and incubated over 3 d. After refolding, the sample was concentrated in a stir cell to a volume of 30–50 ml and centrifuged at 15 000 rev min−1 at 277 K for 30 min. The supernatant was dialysed into gel-filtration buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl) and purified by gel-filtration chromatography using a Superdex 75 HR column (Amersham). The purified protein was desalted and its molecular weight was determined by mass spectrometry to be 12 488.0 Da (Fig. 1[link]), which agrees well with the calculated weight of 12 488.6 Da.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mass-spectrometric results for WNV-rED3. The molecular weight of the refolded rED3 is clearly shown.

2.3. Crystallization

Crystallization trials were set up with Hampton Crystal Screens 1 and 2 at 291 K using the hanging-drop method. Drops contained equal volumes (1 µl each) of protein solution (10 mg ml−1) and reservoir crystallization buffer and were placed over a well containing 200 µl reservoir solution. Crystals suitable for data collection were grown from the optimized conditions [1.5 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5 with 9–10%(v/v) DMSO] to full size (typical dimensions 10 × 10 × 100 µm; Fig. 2[link]) in four weeks.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Typical appearance of crystals in a crystallization drop.

2.4. Data collection and processing

Data were collected in-house on a Rigaku MicroMax007 rotating-anode X-ray generator operating at 40 kV and 20 mA (Cu Kα; λ = 1.5418 Å) equipped with an R-AXIS VII++ image-plate detector. A complete set was collected to 2.8 Å (Fig. 3[link]) at 100 K from a single crystal. The diffraction data were indexed, integrated and scaled with DENZO and the HKL2000 software package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326.]). The statistics of data processing are summarized in Table 1[link]. The space group was determined to be P2221, with unit-cell parameters a = 52.6, b = 59.7, c = 95.0 Å. The Matthews coefficients (Table 2[link]; Matthews, 1968[Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497.]) are consistent with either two or three molecules in the asymmetric unit.

Table 1
Data-processing statistics

Values in parentheses are for the last resolution shell.

X-ray wavelength (Å) 1.5418
Temperature (K) 100
Space group P2221
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 52.56, b = 59.69, c = 95.03
Resolution range (Å) 50.0–2.8
Total/unique reflections 58444/7238
Rmerge 19.2 (54.5)
Data completeness (%) 92.7 (100)
Average I/σ(I) 9.9 (3.1)

Table 2
Matthews coefficient calculations

Molecules per AU Matthews coefficient (Å3 Da−1) Solvent content (%)
2 2.9 57.4
3 1.9 36.1
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Typical diffraction pattern showing diffraction beyond 3.0 Å.

3. Results and discussion

The target protein is expressed at elevated levels as inclusion bodies. We demonstrate here that these insoluble materials can be successfully refolded and purified. The purified sample has a molecular weight of 12.5 kDa, as determined by mass spectrometry and SDS–PAGE, which agrees well with the monomeric molecular weight. The gel-filtration elution profile is consistent with a monomeric species in solution (data not shown). Although WNV domain III is significantly less stable than its other flaviviral homologues (Yu et al., 2004[Yu, S., Wuu, A., Basu, R., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Lee, J. C. (2004). Biochemistry, 43, 9168-9176.]), this refolded protein forms good-quality crystals that diffract to medium resolution. It is conceivable that the protein-refolding approach may be generally applicable to the purification and crystallization of other homologous viral envelope proteins. A similar refolding approach of WNV-rED3 has been reported by Chu et al. (2005[Chu, J. J., Rajamanonmani, R., Li, J., Bhuvanakantham, R., Lescar, J. & Ng, M. L. (2005). J. Gen. Virol. 86, 405-412.]), who showed that the preparation is biologically active. Further optimization of crystal quality and structure solution of this protein are under way.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Laboratory of Structural Biology of Tsinghua University and the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Molecular Virology in the Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing resources, research and technical support for this project. We are grateful to Dr Alan D. T. Barrett for providing us with the plasmid harbouring the WNV E gene. Dr Yu Wai Chen is a visiting professor at the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Molecular Virology in the Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). This work was partially supported by a grant from The National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (grant No. 30228025).

References

First citationCenters for Disease Control and Protection (2003). West Nile Virus: Surveillance and Control Case Count of West Nile Virus Disease 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount03_detailed.htmGoogle Scholar
First citationCenters for Disease Control and Protection (2004). West Nile Virus: Surveillance and Control Case Count of West Nile Virus Disease 2004. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount04_detailed.htmGoogle Scholar
First citationChu, J. J., Rajamanonmani, R., Li, J., Bhuvanakantham, R., Lescar, J. & Ng, M. L. (2005). J. Gen. Virol. 86, 405–412.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationCrill, W. D. & Roehrig, J. T. (2001). J. Virol. 75, 7769–7773.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGao, G. F., Gerth, U. C., Wyer, J. R., Willcox, B. E., O'Callaghan, C. A., Zhang, Z., Jones, E. Y., Bell, J. I. & Jakobsen, B. K. (1998). Protein Sci. 7, 1245–1249.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGao, G. F., Hussain, M. H., Reid, H. W. & Gould, E. A. (1994). J. Gen. Virol. 75, 609–614.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationHeinz, F. X. & Allison, S. L. (2000). Adv. Virus Res. 55, 231–269.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationJiang, W. R., Lowe, A., Higgs, S., Reid, H. & Gould, E. A. (1993). J. Gen. Virol. 74, 931–935.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMandl, C. W., Allison, S. L., Holzmann, H., Meixner, T. & Heinz, F. X. (2000). J. Virol. 74, 9601–9609.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMatthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationModis, Y., Ogata, S., Clements, D. & Harrison, S. C. (2005). J. Virol. 79, 1223–1231.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationVolk, D. E., Beasley, D. W., Kallick, D. A., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Gorenstein, D. G. (2004). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38755–38761.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationYu, S., Wuu, A., Basu, R., Holbrook, M. R., Barrett, A. D. & Lee, J. C. (2004). Biochemistry, 43, 9168–9176.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds