crystallization communications
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the O-methyltransferase NovP from the novobiocin-biosynthetic cluster of Streptomyces spheroides
aDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, England, and bDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: david.lawson@bbsrc.ac.uk
Crystals of recombinant NovP (subunit MW = 29 967 Da; 262 amino acids), an S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent O-methyltransferase from Streptomyces spheroides, were grown by vapour diffusion. The protein crystallized in P2, with unit-cell parameters a = 51.81, b = 46.04, c = 61.22 Å, β = 104.97°. Native data to a maximum resolution of 1.4 Å were collected from a single crystal at the synchrotron. NovP is involved in the biosynthesis of the aminocoumarin antibiotic novobiocin that targets the essential bacterial enzyme DNA gyrase.
Keywords: NovP; O-methyltransferase; Streptomyces; novobiocin; antibiotic biosynthesis.
1. Introduction
The aminocoumarin antibiotics competitively inhibit the ATPase activity of DNA gyrase, a validated drug target (Maxwell, 1997; Maxwell & Lawson, 2003), and thus have considerable therapeutic potential. The three main compounds novobiocin, clorobiocin and coumermycin A1 share common structural features, namely a 3-amino-4,7-dihydroxycoumarin moiety, an L-noviosyl sugar and an aromatic acyl component attached to the amino group of the aminocoumarin moiety. Crystallographic studies on aminocoumarin complexes of DNA gyrase (Lewis et al., 1996; Holdgate et al., 1997; Tsai et al., 1997) have shown that methyl groups form important hydrophobic interactions with the target enzyme and thus may have profound effects on the potency of these antibiotics. Here, we report the crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of NovP, an S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent O-methyltransferase from Streptomyces spheroides responsible for the methylation of the 4′-hydroxyl group of the noviose sugar, which represents the penultimate step in novobiocin biosynthesis (Freel Meyers et al., 2004).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Protein expression, purification and crystallization
The S. spheroides novP gene was amplified by PCR using S. spheroides genomic DNA as a template. The amplified DNA was cloned into the vector pET28a (Novagen) to give a plasmid encoding a polypeptide with a thrombin-cleavable N-terminal hexahistidine tag. This added a further 20 residues to the native protein (with sequence MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSH), giving a total deduced molecular weight of 32 130 Da. This plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3) (Studier & Moffatt, 1986) and a 10 ml overnight culture of the cells harbouring the novP-pET28a construct was used to inoculate a 1 l culture of Luria–Bertani medium containing 50 mg kanamycin. This was left shaking for 24 h at 298 K without induction by isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Harvested cells were resuspended in buffer A [25 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol] and lysed by passage through a French press at 6.9 MPa. The cell lysate obtained by centrifugation at 15 000g for 30 min was bound onto approximately 3 ml Ni2+-charged Hi-trap metal-chelation resin for 2 h. Unbound proteins were removed by washing with 2 mM imidazole in 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol. His-tagged NovP bound to the resin was eluted stepwise with 20–500 mM imidazole in 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol. The fractions containing NovP were pooled and dialysed against buffer A. The His tag was not cleaved. The purified protein was stored under liquid nitrogen in 30 µl aliquots and subsequently shipped on dry ice for crystallization trials.
Prior to crystallization, approximately 1 ml purified NovP was buffer-exchanged into 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM DTT and concentrated to around 10 mg ml−1 using an Ultrafree 10 kDa cutoff concentrator (Millipore). Dynamic (DLS) was used to monitor the solution properties of the protein. For this purpose, approximately 30 µl of sample was centrifuged through a 0.1 µm Ultrafree filter (Millipore) to remove particulate material before introduction into a 12 µl microsampling cell. The latter was then inserted into a Dynapro-MSTC molecular-sizing instrument at 293 K (Protein Solutions Inc.). A minimum of 15 scattering measurements were taken and the resulting data were analysed using the DYNAMICS software package (Protein Solutions Inc.).
Crystallization trials were carried out by vapour diffusion in hanging drops using a variety of in-house and commercially available screens (Hampton Research) at a constant temperature of 291 K. Drops consisted of 1 µl protein solution mixed with 1 µl well solution and the well volume was 1.0 ml; the protein concentration was approximately 10 mg ml−1. Trials were performed both with and without 1 mM S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH). Improved crystals were subsequently obtained by refining the successful conditions from the initial screens.
2.2. Cryoprotection and X-ray data collection
Prior to cryogenic data collection, crystals were briefly (<30 s) soaked in cryoprotectant, which corresponded to the crystallization solution with the addition of 25%(v/v) ethylene glycol in place of an equivalent volume of buffer. Crystals were routinely transferred from one solution to another and ultimately mounted for X-ray data collection using cryoloops (Hampton Research).
For data collection, a crystal was flash-cooled by plunging into liquid nitrogen and stored prior to transport to the synchrotron. The crystal was subsequently transferred to the goniostat on station PX10.1 at the Daresbury Synchrotron Radiation Source and maintained at 100 K with a Cryojet cryocooler (Oxford Instruments). Diffraction data were recorded using a MAR 225 CCD detector (MAR USA) with the wavelength set to 1.488 Å. The diffraction data were processed using the HKL-2000 suite (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Preliminary analysis of the data set was performed using programs from the CCP4 suite (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994).
3. Results and discussion
NovP was overexpressed and purified with an approximate yield of 20 mg of protein from 1 l culture and was judged to be greater than 95% pure from SDS–PAGE analysis. DLS analysis gave a monomodal distribution with a relatively low polydispersity of 17.1%. From these results, the molecular size was estimated at 32.8 kDa, being very close to the value expected for a His-tagged NovP monomer (32.1 kDa).
No crystallization conditions could be established for the NovP protein alone, whilst the sample containing SAH yielded crystals that were either plates or needles. The largest crystals were approximately 300 × 50 × 20 µm in size (Fig. 1) and took up to one month to grow. The optimized precipitant was 2 M ammonium sulfate in 100 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.0.
Native X-ray data were collected from a single NovP crystal in two passes, the first at low resolution and the second at high resolution. For the low-resolution pass, 100 × 1.5° oscillation images were recorded to 2.46 Å resolution. The high-resolution pass was recorded to a maximum resolution of 1.35 Å and consisted of 150 × 1° oscillation images. The symmetry was established as primitive monoclinic, with unit-cell parameters a = 51.81, b = 46.04, c = 61.22 Å, β = 104.97°. After merging the two passes, the data set was 93.4% complete to 1.35 Å, but only 32.0% complete in the outer resolution shell. Reprocessing to a maximum of 1.40 Å resolution gave overall and outer shell completeness values of 98.8 and 89.5%, respectively (see Table 1). Inspection of pseudo-precession plots generated by the program HKLVIEW clearly indicated that the was P2. Estimation of the content of the based on a single His-tagged protomer (32 130 Da) gave a crystal-packing parameter (VM) of 2.19 Å3 Da−1, with a corresponding solvent content of 43.9% (Matthews, 1968).
|
Analysis of the NovP sequence using the FUGUE server (https://www-cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/~fugue/prfsearch.html; Shi et al., 2001) indicated that there were no suitable templates for in the Protein Data Bank; although three `certain' hits were identified (with Z scores ranging from 11.4 to 9.3), their sequence identities with NovP did not exceed 18%. Thus, we will use methods to solve the structure of NovP.
Footnotes
‡Present address: Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Acknowledgements
CEMS and DML would like to thank the BBSRC for financial support through responsive mode funding (ref. B19400) and the Core Strategic Grant to the John Innes Centre. CLFM and CTW were funded by NIH grants F32 AI054007 and GM 49338, respectively. R. Chen is acknowledged for isolation of S. spheroides genomic DNA. We are also grateful to W. Holsgrave for help with crystallization and to M. Cianci, M. Ellis and R. Strange for assistance with data collection at the SRS (Daresbury).
References
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Freel Meyers, C. L., Oberthur, M., Xu, H., Heide, L., Kahne, D. & Walsh, C. T. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 67–70. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Holdgate, G. A., Tunnicliffe, A., Ward, W. H., Weston, S. A., Rosenbrock, G., Barth, P. T., Taylor, I. W., Pauptit, R. A. & Timms, D. (1997). Biochemistry, 36, 9663–9673. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Lewis, R. J., Singh, O. M., Smith, C. V., Skarzynski, T., Maxwell, A., Wonacott, A. J. & Wigley, D. B. (1996). EMBO J. 15, 1412–1420. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. (1997). Trends Microbiol. 5, 102–109. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. & Lawson, D. M. (2003). Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 3, 283–303. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Shi, J., Blundell, T. L. & Mizuguchi, K. (2001). J. Mol. Biol. 310, 243–257. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Studier, F. W. & Moffatt, B. A. (1986). J. Mol. Biol. 189, 113–130. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Tsai, F. T., Singh, O. M., Skarzynski, T., Wonacott, A. J., Weston, S., Tucker, A., Pauptit, R. A., Breeze, A. L., Poyser, J. P., O'Brien, R., Ladbury, J. E. & Wigley, D. B. (1997). Proteins, 28, 41–52. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.