view article
Figure 3
Comparison of crystallographic B values and NMR displacements ([\overline D]). (a) Linear least-squares fit of the crystallographic [\overline B] values (2)[link] versus the corresponding displacements [\overline D] (1)[link] in the reference crystal structure, yielding the c value in (3)[link] for NP_247299.1, with c = 1/87. (b) Plots of the per-residue polypeptide backbone displacements versus the NP_247299.1 sequence. Upper panel, crystal structure and reference crystal structure. Lower panel, NMR structure and reference NMR structure. For the crystal structure, per-residue displacements were calculated from the [\overline B] values with (2)[link] and (3)[link]. For the NMR structure and the two reference structures, the data correspond to the per-residue displacements calculated with (1)[link]. The locations of regular secondary structures are indicated at the bottom of the upper panel.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Volume 66| Part 10| July 2010| Pages 1367-1380
doi:10.1107/S1744309110005890
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS