view article
Figure 3
(a) The optimal energy (right-hand axis) as a function of sample thickness for Al and Fe on ID31, assuming a flux independent of energy. The corresponding count rate for a 1 mm3 sampling gauge for (311)Al and (211)Fe expected for the optimal energy is also shown (left-hand axis). (b) The normalized distance (path length/attenuation length) based on the optimal energy as a function of depth.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 37| Part 4| July 2004| Pages 607-612
doi:10.1107/S0021889804012750
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS