Size–strain line-broadening analysis of the ceria round-robin sample

Balzar, D.; Audebrand, N.; Daymond, M.R.; Fitch, A.; Hewat, A.; Langford, J.I.; Le Bail, A.; Louër, D.; Masson, O.; McCowan, C.N.; Popa, N.C.; Stephens, P.W.; Toby, B.H.

doi:10.1107/S0021889804022551

Journal of Applied Crystallography Journal of Applied
Crystallography

IUCr IT WDC

home archive editors for authors for readers submit subscribe open access

view article

Figure 4
Average apparent volume-weighted domain size for different methods. The mean is an average over all the results, LL is the Lorentz–Lorentz integral-breadth method (Klug & Alexander, 1974

), LG is the Lorentz (size)–Gauss (strain) integral-breadth method (Klug & Alexander, 1974

), VV1 is the double-Voigt method following Langford (1980

), VV2 is the double-Voigt method following Balzar (1992

), and FP is the `fundamental parameter' approach (Cheary & Coelho, 1992

JOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

ISSN: 1600-5767

Volume 37| Part 6| November 2004| Pages 911-924

doi:10.1107/S0021889804022551

Follow J. Appl. Cryst.

Search term		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page