view article
Figure 3
Computation of the IRF for c1 = c1,optimum (equal to 0.8, 0.73 and 0.5 for 10, 13 and 25 keV) and c2 = c2,optimum [\cong 1] in the bent–bent case (a), and for c1 = c1,optimum, c2 = 0.25 in the bent–flat case (b) at 10, 13 and 25 keV, assuming that both sample and thermal expansion effects are negligible.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 39| Part 3| May 2006| Pages 347-357
doi:10.1107/S0021889806009319
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS