view article

Figure 4
(a) TEM bright-field image of the as-cast Mg–9.76 wt% Sn alloy after annealing at 823 K for 12 h and before aging. (b) Corresponding SAED pattern obtained from the internal region of an α-Mg grain in (a). (c) TEM bright-field image of the Mg–9.76 wt% Sn alloy aged at 573 K for 5 h to peak hardness. The inset shows a high-magnification image of the particle marked as P1. (d) SAED pattern of particle P1 and the matrix [in (c)] along the [{[001]_\beta }//{[2\overline 1\overline 10]_\alpha }] direction. (e) Corresponding simulated electron diffraction pattern of (d). Open circles represent β-Mg2Sn and filled circles represent α-Mg. (f) SAED pattern of P1 and the matrix [in (c)] along the [{[1\overline 10]_\beta }//{[01\overline 10]_\alpha }] direction. (g) Corresponding simulated electron diffraction pattern of (f). Open circles represent β-Mg2Sn and filled circles represent α-Mg. (h) SAED pattern of particle Q1 and the matrix [in (c)] along the [{[\overline 111]_\beta }//{[1\overline 210]_\alpha }] direction. (i) Corresponding simulated electron diffraction pattern of (h). Open circles represents β-Mg2Sn and filled circles represent α-Mg. (j) TEM bright-field image of the Mg–9.76 wt% Sn alloy aged at 573 K for 5 h, corresponding to its peak hardness, along the [{[0001]_\alpha }] direction. (k) SAED pattern of the matrix [in (j)] along the [{[0001]_\alpha }] direction.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds