view article
Figure 5
(a) FWHM of all peaks plotted versus [\tan\theta] for different values of accepted blurring (Caglioti plot). The inset shows the deviation from the usual behaviour at low angles when more parts of the detector are used. (b) Rietveld analysis of the powder diffraction pattern extracted with 0.12 mm allowed blurring. Shown are the experimental data together with the fit and their difference on a square-root scale. The insets show a comparison of fits for 0.12 mm allowed blurring or when all channels are used for the {100}, {110} and {500} Bragg peaks. The curves are vertically shifted for clarity.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 48| Part 2| March 2015| Pages 613-618
doi:10.1107/S1600576715003465
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS