Figure 4
versus sin2ψ plots for the mechanically polished Ti sample, measured with α = 5°. In figures (a) and (b) the theoretical plots were fitted to the experimental points determined with assumed c0/a0 values, whereas in the case of figure (c) the c0/a0 parameter was adjusted. An uncertainty of the peak position δ(2θ) = 0.01° was assumed. |