view article
Figure 2
Input reflectivity data for the simulated three-layer system at three different solvent contrasts (points) and the corresponding fitted reflectivity curves (solid lines). For clarity, the D2O and H2O data are shifted by two orders of magnitude. The gap that appears in the SMW contrast data arises because we do not consider reflectivity values below 10−6.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 52| Part 3| June 2019| Pages 538-547
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576719003534
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS