view article

Figure 4
Comparison of published PXCT experiments (Dierolf et al., 2010BB14; Guizar-Sicairos et al., 2011BB22, 2015BB21; Diaz et al., 2012BB13, 2014BB12; Esmaeili et al., 2013BB19; Trtik et al., 2013BB54; Holler et al., 2014BB25, 2017BB29; Donnelly et al., 2015BB15; Fløystad et al., 2015BB7; Dam et al., 2015BB9; Fam et al., 2018BB20; Polo et al., 2018BB42; Kahnt et al., 2018BB33; Sala et al., 2019BB44; Becher et al., 2019BB5; Weissenberger et al., 2019BB55; Kahnt et al., 2019BB32) in magenta, cyan and yellow with the present data in red. (Left) The average achieved 2D translational scanning speed (scan dimensions for a single projection divided by the time it took to record one projection) plotted against the imaged volume. (Right) The beam diameter used at the sample position plotted against the imaged volume.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds