Data reduction for serial crystallography using a robust peak finder

Hadian-Jazi, M.; Sadri, A.; Barty, A.; Yefanov, O.; Galchenkova, M.; Oberthuer, D.; Komadina, D.; Brehm, W.; Kirkwood, H.; Mills, G.; Wijn, R. de; Letrun, R.; Kloos, M.; Vakili, M.; Gelisio, L.; Darmanin, C.; Mancuso, A.P.; Chapman, H.N.; Abbey, B.

doi:10.1107/S1600576721007317

Journal of Applied Crystallography Journal of Applied
Crystallography

IUCr IT WDC

home archive editors for authors for readers submit subscribe open access

view article

Figure 14
Comparison of the performance of RPF and PF8 methods for (a) $[{\rm CC}^{*}]$ , (b) R_split, (c) CC_1/2 and (d) SNR as a function of the minimum acceptable SNR threshold for four different resolutions. The performance of RPF for all four resolutions in all figures is less sensitive to change in the minimum acceptable SNR threshold. However, the PF8 performance is very sensitive to the change of minimum acceptable SNR threshold.

JOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

ISSN: 1600-5767

Volume 54| Part 5| October 2021| Pages 1360-1378

https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576721007317

Open

access

Follow J. Appl. Cryst.

Search IUCr Journals		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page