view article
Figure 3
For the initial parameters C0 = 0.85, [\phi_{0}] = 60°, approximated deviations for phase ϕ [(a), (b), (c)] and contrast C [(d), (e), (f)] versus the number of total count events ([I = I_{1}+I_{2}+\cdots +I_{k}]) for a single run [(a) and (d)] and averaged over 500 runs [(b) and (e)]. The standard deviations [(c) and (f)] calculated, respectively, for the reconstruction method (rec; in red) and generic fitting procedures using four (fit,4; in green) and 16 (fit,16; in blue) time bins are displayed as dots together with their fits (solid lines) from which the power-law exponents were extracted. For clarification the black lines show a power law with an exponent of −0.5. To highlight the significance of the resulting phase as a function of events, (a) and (b) have been purposefully cropped. Except in (d) and (e), the green data points coincide with the red data points, reflecting nearly identical values.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 1| February 2022| Pages 14-20
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576721011936
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS