view article
Figure 6
Summary of the fit results for Nanoperm. (a) [\chi^{2}(A)] function [equation (25)[link]]. (b) Residual SANS cross section [{\rm d}\Sigma_{{\rm res}}/{\rm d}\Omega] (linear–log scale). (c) Anisotropy-field scattering function [S_{{\rm H}}(q)] (linear–log scale). (d) Magnetostatic scattering function [S_{{\rm M}}(q)] (linear–log scale). The best-fit value [A_{{\rm bf}}] for the exchange-stiffness constant and the estimates for the mean anisotropy field [\mu_{0}({\langle|{\bf H}_{{\rm p}}|^{2}\rangle})^{1/2}] and the mean magnetostatic field [\mu_{0}({\langle |M_{z}|^{2}\rangle})^{1/2}] based on equation (20)[link] are indicated. Settings from Fig. 4[link] in the user guide were used. Data taken from Honecker et al. (2013BB9).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 4| August 2022| Pages 1055-1062
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576722005349
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS