view article
Figure 13
Runtime comparison between MoloVol and several other programs. Calculations were conducted in all applications using the same input parameters when applicable (i.e. atomic radii, probe radius and grid resolution). MoloVol performs faster than Zeo++, PoreBlazer and PLATON and slightly slower than 3V.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 4| August 2022| Pages 1033-1044
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576722004988
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS