view article
Figure 2
A comparison between the numerical solution using the Landau–Lifshitz equation (upper row) and the second-order analytical solution (21[link]) for [\| \boldpsi (\boldxi) \| = [\psi_{1}^{2} (\boldxi) + \psi_{2}^{2} (\boldxi)]^{1/2}] (lower row). (a) and (e) show ∥ψ∥ on the boundary surface (ξ = 1), while (b)–(d) and (f)–(h) display selected planar cuts in (ξx, ξy, ξz) space. The following parameters are used: eA = ez, b0 = [0.4, 0, 0.4] (B0 ≅ 266 mT), kc = 0.1, ks = 3.0 and m0 = [sinβcosα, sinβsinα, cosβ], where α = 0° and β = 40°.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 6| December 2022| Pages 1475-1487
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576722008925
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS