view article
Figure 6
Comparison of grain maps. (a) A virtual input grain structure in a cylinder shape (diameter × height = 400 × 600 µm). (b) A reconstructed grain map using the GPU-G method from the LabDCT projections in the magnified geometry and (c) the corresponding completeness map. (d) A 2D XZ slice of the input. (e) A 2D XZ slice of the reconstructed grain maps. (f) A 2D XZ slice of the spatial deviation map, with a unit of pixels where 1 pixel = 2.5 µm. Note that the spatial deviations (εS) for each pixel are computed in three dimensions using the method proposed by Fang, Hovad et al. (2021BB4) but only visualized in two dimensions in panel (f).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 6| December 2022| Pages 1652-1663
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576722010214
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS