view article
Figure 4
A comparison of the output of the reverse Monte Carlo algorithm with and without detector smearing applied to the simulated intensity. Comparisons are between the experimental intensity (left) and the final simulated intensity (right): (a) SANS with no smearing, (d) SANS with smearing and (g) SAXS with no smearing. (b), (e) and (h) show the particle distributions in the xy plane that yielded the final simulated intensities in (a), (d) and (g), respectively. (c), (f) and (i) show sector analyses of the data shown in (a), (d) and (g), respectively, with the symbols representing experimental data and the lines displaying the simulations. Each profile is shifted by a factor of 102 compared with the one below. The field direction is parallel to the y axis. The experimental data set is based on results described by Nandakumaran et al. (2021BB33)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 55| Part 6| December 2022| Pages 1592-1602
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576722009219
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS