view article
Figure 2
(a), (b) Comparisons between the recorded intensities on a logarithmic scale on (a) the Maxipix detector (1 s per step) and (b) the CITIUS detector (0.1152 s per step) for the 111 Bragg peak scattered from the same Pt particle. White pixels indicate the detector gap or zero-value pixels. The 3D signal has been summed across the out-of-plane rocking angle. (c), (d) Slices at the maximum of the rocking curve shown on a logarithmic scale for (c) the Maxipix and (d) the CITIUS detector. The shown slices from each detector have equivalent surface area, where the difference in pixel size is taken into account. (e), (f) Three-dimensional views of the isosurface of the reconstructed phase of the Pt particle, where the boundary is drawn at 50% of the maximum density, using data collected with (e) the Maxipix and (f) the CITIUS detector.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 56| Part 4| August 2023| Pages 1032-1037
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576723004314
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS