view article
Figure 4
POMFinder's top five predictions on experimental high-quality X-ray PDF data. Comparisons of the PDF obtained from the 0.05 M ammonium metatungstate solution and the fitted PDF of (a) a W11O35 Keggin-based fragment from the dimeric K5.5Na7Nd[SiW11O39 (H2O)]2(CH3COO)2(H2O)10 complex (Saini et al., 2014BB62), (b) a W12O36 fragment from the K5H(CoW12O40) (H2O)15 crystal (Glass et al., 2014BB28), (c) a W12O40 fragment from an ionic crystal structure of [Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12](H2W12O40)(OH)(H2O)23.12 (Son et al., 2003BB65), (d) a W12O36 fragment from the porous inorganic structure of the formula K2NaH2(BW12O40)(H2O)12 (Han et al., 2012BB32) and (e) a W12Rb4BO43 fragment from another ionic crystal, Rb4[Cr3O(OOCH)6(H2O)3(BW12O40)](H2O)16 (Uchida et al., 2006BB69). W is shown in brown, O in red and Rb in pink. Refinement parameters are reported in Section D in the supporting information.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 57| Part 1| February 2024| Pages 34-43
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576723010014
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS