view article
Figure 6
Results of Bayesian model selection among models K = 1–4 for varying rR values. Panel A shows the posterior probability of each model using data generated with a pseudo-measurement time of T = 1, and panel B shows results for T = 0.1. In cases (a)–(g) and (h)–(n), the radius ratio rR is displayed in descending order for T = 1 and T = 0.1, respectively. The height of each bar corresponds to the average values calculated for ten data sets generated with different random seeds, with the maximum and minimum values shown as error bars. Areas highlighted in red indicate cases where the true model K = 2 was most highly supported, while the blue backgrounds indicate that the likelihood of a model other than K = 2 was the highest.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 57| Part 4| August 2024|
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724004138
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS