view article
Figure 4
(a) Schematic representation of [g_{2_{G,{\rm CCS}}}], which follows equation (16)[link] and Fig. 2[link]. For each Δt, [g_{2_{G,{\rm CCS}}}] represents a different set of τ(t0 + Δt/2) and γ(t0 + Δt/2) pairs. (b) Comparison of g2 cuts for the simulated system for Case 1a, presented in Fig. 3[link], for q = 74 pixels and time = 50. The CCS and ACS cuts from the simulated TTC are represented with orange circles and blue squares, respectively. The black dashed line shows [g_{2_{G,{\rm CCS}}}], calculated via equation (16)[link]. The blue dashed line shows the conventional g2G function, calculated via equation (2)[link].

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 57| Part 4| August 2024| Pages 1098-1106
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724004618
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS