view article
Figure 3
In-gap slice comparison between DL prediction and standard interpolation on experimental BCDI data. (a) 3D experimental BCDI data masked with a cross-like 6 pixel-wide gap – the red dashed line indicates the location of the perpendicular `in-gap slices' shown in (b), (c) and (d). In-gap slice (b) ground truth, (c) DL model prediction and (d) standard linear interpolation using pixels immediately around the gap. Only our DL model was able to restore the correct fringe pattern as highlighted by the turquoise dashed circles.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 57| Part 4| August 2024| Pages 966-974
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724004163
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS