addenda and errata
Verification of a method for determining the
using experimental and computer-generated powder diffraction patterns. CorrigendumaRigaku Holdings Corporation, 3-9-12 Matsubara, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8666, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: toraya@rigaku.co.jp
An erroneous equation and some values of related parameters in the paper by Toraya [J. Appl. Cryst. (2023), 56, 1751–1763] are corrected.
In the paper by Toraya (2023), the term in equation (15) on page 1754 should be divided by the disorder factor D, defined as . It was, however, multiplied with D. The correct equation is given by
Since and d is a variable that is optimized together with the D0, during the minimization of the cost function S [equation (22)], the only consequence of this error is considered to be essentially the change of the sign of d from plus to minus and vice versa. The D0 and d values were recalculated for all intensity datasets used in the study, and their correct values are given in Table 1. As was expected, large negative values of d in Table 2 of Toraya (2023) were converted to relatively large positive values in Table 1 of the present article. Large downward deviations of d values from the horizontal line with in Fig. 7 of Toraya (2023) were converted to upward deviations after the recalculation. The influences of other, small d values were negligible, since, for example, for when . The grand averages for the deviations of the derived D0 values from the nominal values were almost unchanged between the two calculations.
|
References
Toraya, H. (2023). J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 1751–1763. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.