view article

Figure 6
Superposition of computational models with the O1 form crystal structure model of PsiM. In the absence of an anchoring template beyond the Rossman fold enzyme core, the pre-AF homology model (red) delivers a random conformation for the SRL, while AF2 (cyan) provided with low confidence a similarly unstructured SRL conformation. AF3 delivered two slightly different models, one with an open-loop conformation (purple) while the alternative AF3 model (blue) partly follows the experimental O1 model (green). As is the case for X-ray models, the ensemble of various computational models emphasizes that the uncertainties of the models in the SRL are larger than each single prediction model suggests.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds