view article
Figure 8
Comparison of simulated and predicted channeling patterns for crystal 2 as in Fig. 7[link]. Insets give a closer look at the position of the direct beam in both cases. As the crystal orientation has been shifted due to uncertainties associated with using the EBSD-informed ECCI method, the direct beam lies on a different band in the predicted SA-ECP than in the actual. The orientation information, including pattern center and Euler angles, is also tabulated for comparison.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 59| Part 2| April 2026| Pages 530-551
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576726000567
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS