view article
Figure 8
Comparisons between the experimental patterns and two sets of theoretical models. (a) The distributions of Pearson correlation coefficients between the experimental and reference models. The green bars show the results with the core–shell model as reference, and the magenta bars are the results using the cubic model (without an octahedral core). (b) Histogram of Pearson correlation coefficient (Pcc) difference between the experimental patterns and the best matched patterns from the core–shell and cube reference models. Only two out of 559 patterns favor the cube model over the core–shell model.

IUCrJ
Volume 4| Part 6| November 2017| Pages 741-750
ISSN: 2052-2525
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517012398