|
|
|
Figure 22
Density distribution of the two-scale octadecagonal quasicrystal: the black line is the local free-energy density from equation (57) . Here q = k18 ≃ 1.970 and = = 1/13. Note that the purple-colored octadecagonal density distribution extends into the positive values of 2, where the free-energy density is negative, making its overall free energy ≃ −1.223 × 10−3 0. On the other hand, the density distribution of the single-scale hexagonal structure, which is plotted here for reference, cannot extend beyond ϕ = 2 without running into the barrier at −1, which would force its free energy to become positive. This approach for forcing the quasicrystal structure to be the minimum free-energy state succeeds theoretically for all 6n-fold quasicrystals, where n 2, although they become increasingly fragile. |
ISSN: 2052-2525
MATERIALS | COMPUTATION
Open
access
access


journal menu![[Figure 22]](gq5007fig22.jpg)
![[link]](../../../../../../logos/arrows/iucrj_arr.gif)
=
= 1/13. Note that the purple-colored octadecagonal density distribution extends into the positive values of
2, where the free-energy density is negative, making its overall free energy
≃ −1.223 × 10
0. On the other hand, the density distribution of the single-scale hexagonal structure, which is plotted here for reference, cannot extend beyond
−1, which would force its free energy to become positive. This approach for forcing the quasicrystal structure to be the minimum free-energy state succeeds theoretically for all 6
2, although they become increasingly fragile.


