view article
Figure 4
Comparison of consensus molecular envelopes with model envelopes. (a) Test case 5b2c (Kubota et al., 2016BB900) (solvent fraction 0.73, space group P61), CC = 0.67, simple match between envelopes 87%. (b) Test case 5hk7 (Arrigoni et al., 2016BB903) (solvent fraction 0.83, space group I222), CC = 0.60, simple match between envelopes 90%. (c) Test case 4bex (Klejnot et al., 2013BB902) (solvent fraction 0.73, space group P3221), CC = 0.77, simple match between envelopes 92%. (d) Test case 2rha (Joint Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work) (solvent fraction 0.80, space group P43212), CC = 0.86, simple match between envelopes 95%. Displayed in surface representation is the volume associated with 4 adjacent unit cells, from a single viewpoint. The consensus envelopes generated by the clustering and averaging procedure are shown in gold, and the model envelopes are shown in light blue. Figs. 4[link], 5[link] and 6[link] were prepared with the aid of UCSF ChimeraX (Pettersen et al., 2021BB67).

IUCrJ
Volume 9| Part 5| September 2022| Pages 648-665
ISSN: 2052-2525
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252522006996