research papers
Observing femtosecond orbital dynamics in ultrafast Ge melting with time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering
aDepartment of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea, bCenter for Ultrafast Science in Quantum Matter, Max Planck POSTECH/Korea Research Initiative, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea, cPhoton Science Center, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea, dDepartment of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea, ePohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea, fDepartment of Physics and Photon Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea, and gInstitute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: yungokihm@postech.ac.kr, cysong@postech.ac.kr
Photoinduced nonequilibrium phase transitions have stimulated interest in the dynamic interactions between electrons and crystalline ions, which have long been overlooked within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. Ultrafast melting before lattice thermalization prompted researchers to revisit this issue to understand ultrafast photoinduced weakening of the crystal bonding. However, the absence of direct evidence demonstrating the role of orbital dynamics in lattice disorder leaves it elusive. By performing time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering with an X-ray free-electron laser, we directly monitored the ultrafast dynamics of bonding orbitals of Ge to drive photoinduced melting. Increased ab initio and two-temperature simulations. This study elucidates the impact of bonding orbitals on lattice stability with a unifying interpretation on photoinduced melting.
of bonding electrons amplifies the orbital disturbance to expedite the lattice disorder approaching the sub-picosecond scale of the nonthermal regime. The lattice disorder time shows strong nonlinear dependence on the laser fluence with a crossover behavior from thermal-driven to nonthermal-dominant kinetics, which is also verified by1. Introduction
Networked spatial arrangements of ions, bound tightly by shared valence electrons, become fundamental building blocks of crystals that host various physical properties to include topologically protected extraordinary dynamics of charges and spins, superconductivity with cooperative dynamics of electrons and the lattice etc. As such, lattice stability plays an essential role in inducing emergent physical properties with exotic phases to facilitate ongoing research activities (Born & Huang, 1954; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Beaud et al., 2014; Stojchevska et al., 2014; Buzzi et al., 2018). Lattice energetics are intertwined with various interactions, including ionic Coulomb interactions and electron correlations, which complicate the investigation of structure-based phase changes. Femtosecond (fs) infrared (IR) laser pulses enable us to access electron-triggered phase transitions by promoting active research on photoinduced ultrafast phenomena (Nasu, 2004; Gamaly, 2011; Mathias et al., 2012; Buzzi et al., 2018; Ihm et al., 2019).
In particular, the nonthermal melting that displays lattice disorder before ion thermalization has attracted special interest as a fundamental science issue concerning the simplest yet essential building blocks of solids (Siders et al., 1999; Rousse et al., 2001). The critical role of bonding orbitals in maintaining a becomes reappreciated by observing lattice disorder from photo-depleted bonding charges without disturbing ions. Femtosecond of bonding electrons weakens crystalline bonding, and even abruptly breaks the lattice order by changing the electronic surface (PES), as described by the bond-softening effect in covalently bonded crystals (Fritz et al., 2007; Jung et al., 2021). Also, by phase-matching ionic vibrations, coherent phonons can be induced to drive the ultrafast melting, as shown by the optical property measurements, X-ray diffraction (XRD) etc. (Pfeifer et al., 1992; Zeiger et al., 1992; Chatelain et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2015). There have been various physical pictures that successfully account for ultrafast nonthermal lattice disorder, but experimental evidence directly verifying the photoinduced reconfigurations of the bonding electrons has been absent. This implies that the first physical process of photoexcited electrons to disturb the crystal bonding has been veiled, or that underlying physical mechanisms at the fundamental level describing the impact of bonding orbitals remain elusive (Siders et al., 1999; Gamaly, 2011; Medvedev et al., 2015; Lian et al., 2016).
2. Experimental
To understand the femtosecond dynamics of electrons in bonding orbitals related to lattice disorder, we performed time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering (tr-RXS) experiments at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory X-ray Free-Electron Laser (PAL-XFEL). An ultrafast time-resolved investigation was performed using femtosecond Ti-sapphire laser (λ = 800 nm) pumping and X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) probing [Fig. 1(a), see Section S1 of the supporting information for details]. Temporal resolution was maintained at better than 200 fs (Kang et al., 2017). Single-pulse XRD patterns were collected, and any unwanted data collection from damaged sample areas was prevented by moving the X-ray and IR laser illumination spots across the crystal (see Section S2 of the supporting information for details).
High-purity Ge crystals of the [001] direction cut wafers were used for the experiments. XRD patterns in specular reflection geometry (incident angle equal to the scattered angle) cover the (0 0 L) reflections. Here, L = 4n allows Bragg reflections of the for any integer value of n. The reflections at (0 0 4n+2) are systematically forbidden due to the glide plane symmetry of the Ge ions in the Fd3m. The extinction rule restricts the (0 0 4n+2) reflections to be forbidden even with anisotropic bonding or anharmonic thermal motion. They are distinguished from the observable (2n 2n 2n) reflections, even weak, due to aspherical charge distribution of the Ge ions; this is caused by charges distributed along the (111) directional covalent bonds (Roberto & Batterman, 1970). However, (0 0 4n+2) reflections are forbidden by the glide plane symmetry and can only be observed when the X-rays gain sensitivity to anisotropic orbital environments, known as anisotropic tensor susceptibility (ATS) scattering (Dmitrienko, 1983; Murakami et al., 1998). This is realized for the resonant X-ray scattering (RXS) process by resonantly enhancing the X-ray sensitivity to a specific through orbital-specific electric multipole transitions (Finkelstein et al., 1992; Templeton & Templeton, 1994; Murakami et al., 1998; Ji et al., 2003). We used the Ge K-edge to observe the 4p orbitals that directly mediate the covalent bonding of the Ge crystal via 4sp3 [Figs. 1(a) and 1(c)]. As such, RXS intensity of the (0 0 4n+2) reflections will directly reflect orbital states involved in the covalent bonding of Ge (Elfimov et al., 2001).
Photoinduced dynamics of the bonding orbitals related to the lattice disorder were investigated by monitoring (0 0 6) ATS and (0 0 4) Bragg reflections. We have chosen (0 0 4n+2) forbidden reflections with their exclusive sensitivity to the 4sp3 atomic orbitals. These ATS reflections are resistant to extrinsic effects such as anharmonic lattice distortions, defects etc. and are responsive to intrinsic orbital configuration; the aforementioned (2n 2n 2n) reflections are susceptible to such charge related defects, thermal motions etc. (Tsai et al., 2019). Tr-RXS directly monitors the dynamics of Ge bonding orbitals and ions disturbed by fs-IR lasers. IR photo-excitation redistributes electrons from bonding to antibonding orbitals by reducing the Ge bond strength [Fig. 1(a)] (Zürch et al., 2017). By recalling that the RXS tensor is obtained as , one can know that the IR re-arranges the valence shell u to modify the intensity. Here, gi(f) describes the initial (final) core-level state (gf = gi for in our work); u for the unoccupied valence shell with the energy bandwidth Γu, Ebind = Eu − Eg for the core–shell binding energy and ℏω for the incident X-ray energy. Tuning the X-ray energy to the K-edge of Ge promotes multipole transitions of electrons in the 1s core level to accommodate resonantly enhanced sensitivity to specific valence orbitals of corresponding transitions [Fig. 1(c)]. In electric multipole (2L) transitions, denoted EL, the R in the matrix element describes the electromagnetic interaction of the vector potential (A) for the X-rays in polarization (ɛ) with the electron momentum (p), A·p ≃ (ɛ·p)exp(ik·r), for which dominant contributions are considered from the expansion of the vector potential [exp(ik·r)] as ∼1 + ik·r for E1 (1s-to-4p transition for Ge K-edge) and E2 (1s-to-3d) in order (see Section S3 of the supporting information for details).
3. Results and discussion
The intensity variation of the orbital-sensitive (0 0 6) ATS reflection was compared with that of the (0 0 4) Bragg reflection for the laser fluence at 45 mJ cm−2 (Fig. 2). Both Bragg and ATS intensities decreased for ∼300 ps due to lattice thermalization [Fig. 2(a)]. However, careful inspection revealed that the orbital-sensitive reflection displayed a distinct temporal evolution different from the lattice [Fig. 2(b)]. The intensity of the (0 0 4) reflection showing the lattice order remained intact until 7 ps, before it started to decrease. This lagged response showed delayed lattice thermalization requiring sufficient time for electrons to release excessive to ions via the electron–phonon scattering (Sundaram & Mazur, 2002).
However, as the most striking feature revealing the dynamics of bonding orbitals, the intensity of the orbital-sensitive (0 0 6) reflection changed promptly upon laser illumination. It increased monotonically to reach ∼11 % enhancement by 7 ps, then reversed the direction to decay concomitantly with the onset of lattice disorder [Fig. 2(b)]. The (0 0 6) ATS reflection, with direct sensitivity to valence orbitals, explicitly visualized the dynamics of orbitals involved in the crystal bonding as the essence of photoinduced ultrafast melting. Rapid response of this reflection results from the of the 4sp3 bonding orbital electrons to the antibonding and nonbonding orbitals. The of the (0 0 6) reflection sustains its resonance character even after laser illumination, confirming that the space-group symmetry of the Ge crystal is preserved to the extent that the (0 0 4n+2) reflection remains symmetrically forbidden [Fig. 2(c)].
We attributed this (0 0 6) intensity enhancement to the photoinduced changes in the empty density-of-states and ). Screening by photoexcited electrons can be expected to modify the energy band structure, within several hundred femtoseconds, leading to the intensity change but for a short duration; the long-lasting intensity enhancement (∼7 ps) excludes this screening as a main mechanism for the intensity change. We have further confirmed this photoinduced charge redistribution from the bonding to the antibonding orbital from the density functional theory (DFT) calculation [Fig. 3(a)]. For the DFT calculation, the electron population was changed by broadening the Fermi–Dirac (FD) distribution, reflecting the photon and corresponding electron temperature increase (see Section S4 of the supporting information for details). Indeed, the IR led to significant changes in the charge density distribution to lose the original bonding character with redistribution of the bonding electrons to anti-bonding states, supporting our interpretation of the ATS scattering [Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. Although not dominant, we do not exclude other contributions including adiabatic shift and ultrafast redistribution of the FD distribution, gap narrowing, electron–hole plasma formation etc. (Shank et al., 1983)
changes of resonant atoms (Fig. 3Rapid modification of the bonding (d) and 3(e)]. This coherent displacement of the ions accommodates via the E1–E1 transition by lowering the original tetrahedral of Ge ions. We have calculated the using a model with coherently displaced ionic positions to account for the (0 0 6) ATS and (0 0 4) Bragg reflections (see Section S3 of the supporting information for details). Our structure model that incorporates coherent displacements of Ge ions still preserves the overall crystal symmetry without disturbing the (0 0 4) Bragg reflection, but increases the intensity of the (0 0 6) ATS reflection consistent with the experimental results as described in Section S3 of the supporting information. Lattice thermalization can also drive random displacements of Ge ions incoherently, which can result in thermal-motion-induced ATS along with reduced Bragg reflection caused by the Debye-Waller effect (Kirfel et al., 2002; Kokubun & Dmitrienko, 2012). However, this thermal contribution appears at a later delay time with enough from the electron-to-phonon scattering, as shown by the decrease in the (0 0 4) Bragg reflection after a time lag of 7 ps at current laser fluence.
may also induce coherent ionic displacements [Figs. 3The laser-fluence-dependent investigation of the (0 0 6) orbital reflection intensity and the lattice disorder time, determined from the onset of the intensity change in the (0 0 4) Bragg reflection, provides further evidence on the tight correlation between bonding orbitals and lattice instability (Fig. 4). For the increased laser fluence, we observed two main features: faster onset time of the lattice disorder and stronger intensity of the orbital-sensitive (0 0 6) reflection. This indicates that the lattice disorder, in addition to the laser heating, is facilitated by disturbing the bonding orbitals.
In addition, we noted that the rates of change in both the lattice disorder time and the orbital intensity decreased by increasing the laser fluence [Fig. 4(a)]. This cannot be explained by a simple photo-absorption picture: . Here, F denotes the laser fluence, Ne the number of photoexcited electrons, α the one-photon absorption, d the EIR the IR photon energy of 1.54 eV and R the laser reflectance (Zürch et al., 2017) (see Section S7 of the supporting information for details). In this simple relation, the photo-depletion of bonding electrons is expected to be amplified for a strong laser field with Instead, we observed the opposite behavior displaying significantly reduced rates for laser fluences higher than ∼70 mJ cm−2, in both the orbital intensity enhancement and the lattice disorder time [Fig. 4(b)]. The lattice disorder time, varying from a few tens of picoseconds to sub-picosecond, showed a nonlinear dependence on the laser fluence to accompany ultrafast disorder with a saturated response in the orbital dynamics for laser fluences higher than ∼120 mJ cm−2. This sub-picosecond lattice disorder with saturated orbital reaction is consistent with the nonthermal melting of covalently-bonded materials (Stampfli & Bennemann, 1992; Sokolowski-Tinten et al., 1998; Rousse et al., 2001; Fritz et al., 2007; Sciaini et al., 2009).
To understand the fluence dependence, we performed a theoretical investigation using ab initio (AIMD) and two-temperature (TTMD) simulations (see Sections S8 and S9 the supporting information for details). The AIMD simulation was performed by broadening the FD distribution, reflecting photoexcited carrier densities consistent with laser fluences used in experiments. Ionic dynamics in AIMD are influenced exclusively by electron distributions to describe the electron-driven lattice disorder. In contrast, the TTMD reproduces ionic dynamics caused exclusively by increased from the scattering with electrons, i.e. the thermal reaction (Ihm et al., 2019).
The lattice disorder time calculated from the two numerical simulations supported the experimental results at two different regimes, showing better consistency with the AIMD and TTMD results at higher and lower fluences, respectively [Fig. 4(b)]. The AIMD calculated for 1.2 eV broadening in the FD distribution, corresponding to the laser fluence of 170 mJ cm−2, showed sub-picosecond lattice disorder driven by charge depletion in the bonding orbitals and occupation in the antibonding orbitals [Fig. 4(b), see Section S9 of the supporting information for details]. The sub-picosecond saturation of the lattice disorder time obtained from the AIMD simulations reflected the nonthermal effects. Being rooted in the Born–Oppenheimer adiabatic approximation, the AIMD calculation does not consider the physical mechanism of electron–phonon (Iftimie et al., 2005). Instead, the ionic dynamics predicted from the AIMD simulations reflected the modification in interatomic PES due to the photo-induced electronic excitation. Photoinduced electron–hole plasma excitation disturbs the equilibrium ionic position by modifying the electronic PES, thereby inducing bond softening and displacive coherent phonon excitations to cause nonthermal melting (Hunsche et al., 1995).
On the other hand, the lattice disorder time estimated from the TTMD simulation coincided well with the low-fluence experiment, being saturated at ∼5 ps on further fluence increase. This speed limit in inducing the lattice disorder is because the lattice thermalization requires sufficient time for the electron–phonon energy exchange as the essential photo-induced heating mechanism of TTMD. In comparison, bonding-electron-driven lattice disorder with the PES modification, as considered in the AIMD simulation, was a much faster process, surpassing such ionic thermalization speed limit. In the TTMD simulation, photoinduced modification of the electronic
cannot be considered, and the atomic dynamics were driven by ionic influenced by the energy exchange from photo-excited hot electrons through electron–phonon scattering events. The rate of from excited electrons to ions was determined by the electron–phonon coupling constant of Ge that also depends on the temperature to effectively expedite the lattice disorder time on the higher laser fluence. The saturating behavior of the lattice disorder time estimated from the TTMD calculation clearly illustrates that the speed of the ionic disorder becomes limited to several picoseconds, if only the thermal effect is considered.Theoretical investigations have verified that our experimental observations with nonlinear fluence dependence resulted from the crossover behavior of the thermal–nonthermal kinetics on increasing the laser fluence. Interpreting photoinduced sp3 orbitals in Ge with the direct observation of the ultrafast bonding orbital dynamics and lattice disorder following the fs-IR laser illumination. The orbitals responded to the with local symmetry-changing coherent displacement of ions, whereas the lattice reacted with delay. The lattice disorder launched more rapidly by increasing the laser fluence which also accompanied a larger disturbance to the bonding orbitals as verified by fluence-dependent intensity variation in the (0 0 6) ATS reflection. On increasing the laser fluence to more than 70 mJ cm−2, the lattice disorder time showed a crossover behavior to approach sub-picosecond for fluences higher than 120 mJ cm−2; this occurred together with saturated intensity enhancement of orbital-sensitive reflections. The observation, also verified by the AIMD and TTMD simulations, showed continuous crossover reaction from more thermal kinetics toward ultrafast nonthermal kinetics for increased laser fluence.
phenomena often starts by categorizing the dynamics involved as either thermal or nonthermal types without explicit criteria. Further, the bond softening due to depleted bonding electrons has been ascribed to drive photoinduced nonthermal lattice disorder but without direct evidence by monitoring the bonding orbitals. This study resolved these issues by investigating the interaction between the lattice and the 4The fluence-dependence results showed that electron reduction in the bonding orbital weakens the lattice stability, added to ionic thermalization, to facilitate the lattice disorder induced by
The impact of electron depletion in the bonding orbitals becomes stronger by increasing the laser fluence, which eventually disrupts the lattice exclusively by redistributing electrons from the bonding to the antibonding orbitals. By directly investigating the interplay between the bonding orbitals and lattice stability, we obtained a unifying picture, encompassing a thermal–nonthermal kinetic transition, behind the photo-induced lattice disorder, which is the essence of various ultrafast processes in nonequilibrium.4. Summary
In this work, we performed time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering experiments at the PAL-XFEL to investigate the femtosecond dynamics of bonding orbitals related to the lattice order in the photo-induced ultrafast melting transition in a Ge crystal. Temporal evolution of the (0 0 6) ATS reflection with direct sensitivity to the bonding orbital is monitored to show that the photodepletion of bonding electrons leads to an immediate change in the orbital-sensitive reflection whilst the ab initio and two-temperature simulations corroborated the experimental observations at two different regimes to support thermal motion dominated the nonthermal melting picture for increased laser fluence. We verified that the of the electrons from the bonding orbital weakens the lattice stability to expedite the photo-induced lattice disorder, added to electron-lattice thermalization. This impact of bonding electron depletion becomes stronger by increasing the laser fluence, which eventually disrupts the lattice exclusively by redistributing electrons from bonding to antibonding orbitals. Our work provides a comprehensive understanding on the ultrafast melting process in nonequilibrium, explaining pump laser fluence-dependent crossover from thermal to nonthermal dominant dynamics.
disorder launches with delayed response. The delayed response of the lattice disorder shows a nonlinear response on the pump laser fluence to vary from tens of picoseconds to a sub-picosecond delay. Theoretical investigation from5. Related literature
The following references are cited in the supporting information: Alavi et al. (1994); Henry & Straka (2010); Kameshima et al. (2014); Kresse & Furthmüller (1996); Mahdizadeh & Akhlamadi (2017); Norman et al. (2013); Perdew et al. (1996); Piaggi & Parrinello (2017); Plimpton (1995); Yin & Cohen (1982); Zijlstra et al. (2013).
Supporting information
Supporting information figures and table. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252523007935/it5031sup1.pdf
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the stimulating discussion with K.-B. Lee. CS conceived the project. HL, DC and CS analysed the experimental data. JA, YI and JS performed the ab initio and two-temperature simulations and DFT calculations. All authors contributed to the experimental work. CS, YI and HL wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Funding information
This work was funded by the National Research Foundations of Korea (grant Nos. 2019R1A2B5B03070059; 2015R1A5A1009962; 2019R1A6B2A02098631; 2017R1D1A1B03032069; 2018R1D1A1B07040727; 2018R1D1A1B07048306; 2020R1A5A1019141; 2021R1A2C1006329; 2022M3H4A1A04074153). The experiments at PAL-XFEL were approved by KOSUA.
References
Alavi, A., Kohanoff, J., Parrinello, M. & Frenkel, D. (1994). Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2599–2602. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Beaud, P., Caviezel, A., Mariager, S. O., Rettig, L., Ingold, G., Dornes, C., Huang, S. W., Johnson, J. A., Radovic, M., Huber, T., Kubacka, T., Ferrer, A., Lemke, H. T., Chollet, M., Zhu, D., Glownia, J. M., Sikorski, M., Robert, A., Wadati, H., Nakamura, M., Kawasaki, M., Tokura, Y., Johnson, S. L. & Staub, U. (2014). Nat. Mater. 13, 923–927. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Born, M. & Huang, K. (1954). Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Buzzi, M., Först, M., Mankowsky, R. & Cavalleri, A. (2018). Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 299–311. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chatelain, R. P., Morrison, V. R., Klarenaar, B. L. M. & Siwick, B. J. (2014). Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 235502. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dmitrienko, V. E. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 29–35. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Elfimov, I. S., Skorikov, N. A., Anisimov, V. I. & Sawatzky, G. A. (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 015504. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Finkelstein, K. D., Shen, Q. & Shastri, S. (1992). Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1612–1615. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fritz, D. M., Reis, D. A., Adams, B., Akre, R. A., Arthur, J., Blome, C., Bucksbaum, P. H., Cavalieri, A. L., Engemann, S., Fahy, S., Falcone, R. W., Fuoss, P. H., Gaffney, K. J., George, M. J., Hajdu, J., Hertlein, M. P., Hillyard, P. B., Horn-von Hoegen, M., Kammler, M., Kaspar, J., Kienberger, R., Krejcik, P., Lee, S. H., Lindenberg, A. M., McFarland, B., Meyer, D., Montagne, T., Murray, É. D., Nelson, A. J., Nicoul, M., Pahl, R., Rudati, J., Schlarb, H., Siddons, D. P., Sokolowski-Tinten, K., Tschentscher, T., von der Linde, D. & Hastings, J. B. (2007). Science, 315, 633–636. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gamaly, E. (2011). Femtosecond Laser-Matter Interactions: Theory, Experiments and Applications. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing. Google Scholar
Henry, B. I. L. T. A. M. & Straka, P. (2010). ComplexPhysical, Biophysical and Econophysical Systems: World Scientific Lecture Notes in Complex Systems. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
Hunsche, S., Wienecke, K., Dekorsy, T. & Kurz, H. (1995). Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1815–1818. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ichikawa, H., Nozawa, S., Sato, T., Tomita, A., Ichiyanagi, K., Chollet, M., Guerin, L., Dean, N., Cavalleri, A., Adachi, S., Arima, T. H., Sawa, H., Ogimoto, Y., Nakamura, M., Tamaki, R., Miyano, K. & Koshihara, S. Y. (2011). Nat. Mater. 10, 101–105. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Iftimie, R., Minary, P. & Tuckerman, M. E. (2005). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 6654–6659. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ihm, Y., Cho, D. H., Sung, D., Nam, D., Jung, C., Sato, T., Kim, S., Park, J., Kim, S., Gallagher-Jones, M., Kim, Y., Xu, R., Owada, S., Shim, J. H., Tono, K., Yabashi, M., Ishikawa, T., Miao, J., Noh, D. Y. & Song, C. (2019). Nat. Commun. 10, 2411. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ji, S., Song, C., Koo, J., Lee, K. B., Park, Y. J., Kim, J. Y., Park, J. H., Shin, H. J., Rhyee, J. S., Oh, B. H. & Cho, B. K. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257205. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jung, C., Ihm, Y., Cho, D. H., Lee, H., Nam, D., Kim, S., Eom, I.-T., Park, J., Kim, C. & Kim, Y. (2021). Sci. Adv. 7, eabj8552. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kameshima, T., Ono, S., Kudo, T., Ozaki, K., Kirihara, Y., Kobayashi, K., Inubushi, Y., Yabashi, M., Horigome, T., Holland, A., Holland, K., Burt, D., Murao, H. & Hatsui, T. (2014). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 033110. Google Scholar
Kang, H.-S., Min, C.-K., Heo, H., Kim, C., Yang, H., Kim, G., Nam, I., Baek, S. Y., Choi, H.-J., Mun, G., Park, B. R., Suh, Y. J., Shin, D. C., Hu, J., Hong, J., Jung, S., Kim, S.-H., Kim, K., Na, D., Park, S. S., Park, Y. J., Han, J.-H., Jung, Y. G., Jeong, S. H., Lee, H. G., Lee, S., Lee, S., Lee, W.-W., Oh, B., Suh, H. S., Parc, Y. W., Park, S.-J., Kim, M. H., Jung, N.-S., Kim, Y.-C., Lee, M.-S., Lee, B.-H., Sung, C.-W., Mok, I.-S., Yang, J.-M., Lee, C.-S., Shin, H., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y., Lee, J. H., Park, S.-Y., Kim, J., Park, J., Eom, I., Rah, S., Kim, S., Nam, K. H., Park, J., Park, J., Kim, S., Kwon, S., Park, S. H., Kim, K. S., Hyun, H., Kim, S. N., Kim, S., Hwang, S., Kim, M. J., Lim, C., Yu, C., Kim, B., Kang, T., Kim, K., Kim, S., Lee, H., Lee, H., Park, K., Koo, T., Kim, D. & Ko, I. S. (2017). Nat. Photon. 11, 708–713. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kirfel, A., Grybos, J. & Dmitrienko, V. E. (2002). Phys. Rev. B, 66, 165202. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Kokubun, J. & Dmitrienko, V. E. (2012). Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 208, 39–52. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. (1996). Phys. Rev. B, 54, 11169–11186. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Lian, C., Zhang, S. B. & Meng, S. (2016). Phys. Rev. B, 94, 184310. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Mahdizadeh, S. J. & Akhlamadi, G. (2017). J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 72, 1–5. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mathias, S., La-O-Vorakiat, C., Grychtol, P., Granitzka, P., Turgut, E., Shaw, J. M., Adam, R., Nembach, H. T., Siemens, M. E., Eich, S., Schneider, C. M., Silva, T. J., Aeschlimann, M., Murnane, M. M. & Kapteyn, H. C. (2012). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 4792–4797. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Medvedev, N., Li, Z. & Ziaja, B. (2015). Phys. Rev. B, 91, 054113. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Murakami, Y., Hill, J. P., Gibbs, D., Blume, M., Koyama, I., Tanaka, M., Kawata, H., Arima, T., Tokura, Y., Hirota, K. & Endoh, Y. (1998). Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 582–585. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nasu, K. (2004). Photoinduced Phase Transitions. Singapore: World Scienctific Publishing Company. Google Scholar
Norman, G. E., Starikov, S. V., Stegailov, V. V., Saitov, I. M. & Zhilyaev, P. A. (2013). Contrib. Plasma Phys. 53, 129–139. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Pfeifer, T., Kütt, W., Kurz, H. & Scholz, R. (1992). Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3248–3251. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Piaggi, P. M. & Parrinello, M. (2017). J. Chem. Phys. 147, 114112. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Plimpton, S. (1995). J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Roberto, J. & Batterman, B. (1970). Phys. Rev. B, 2, 3220–3226. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Rousse, A., Rischel, C., Fourmaux, S., Uschmann, I., Sebban, S., Grillon, G., Balcou, P., Förster, E., Geindre, J. P., Audebert, P., Gauthier, J. C. & Hulin, D. (2001). Nature, 410, 65–68. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sciaini, G., Harb, M., Kruglik, S. G., Payer, T., Hebeisen, C. T., zu Heringdorf, F. J., Yamaguchi, M., Horn-von Hoegen, M., Ernstorfer, R. & Miller, R. J. (2009). Nature, 458, 56–59. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shank, C. V., Yen, R. & Hirlimann, C. (1983). Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 454–457. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Siders, C. W., Cavalleri, A., Sokolowski-Tinten, K., Tóth, C., Guo, T., Kammler, M., Horn von Hoegen, M., Wilson, K. R., von der Linde, D. & Barty, C. P. (1999). Science, 286, 1340–1342. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sokolowski-Tinten, K., Bialkowski, J., Boing, M., Cavalleri, A. & von der Linde, D. (1998). Phys. Rev. B, 58, R11805–R11808. CAS Google Scholar
Sokolowski-Tinten, K., Blome, C., Dietrich, C., Tarasevitch, A., Horn von Hoegen, M., von der Linde, D., Cavalleri, A., Squier, J. & Kammler, M. (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 225701. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Stampfli, P. & Bennemann, K. H. (1992). Phys. Rev. B, 46, 10686–10692. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Stojchevska, L., Vaskivskyi, I., Mertelj, T., Kusar, P., Svetin, D., Brazovskii, S. & Mihailovic, D. (2014). Science, 344, 177–180. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sundaram, S. K. & Mazur, E. (2002). Nat. Mater. 1, 217–224. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Templeton, D. H. & Templeton, L. K. (1994). Phys. Rev. B, 49, 14850–14853. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Tsai, Y.-W., Chang, Y.-Y., Lee, J.-J., Liu, W.-C., Wu, Y.-H., Liu, W.-R., Liu, H.-Y., Lee, K.-Y., Weng, S.-C., Sheu, H.-S., Chiu, M.-S., Lee, Y.-Y., Hsu, C.-H. & Chang, S.-L. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 819–824. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yin, M. T. & Cohen, M. L. (1982). Phys. Rev. B, 26, 3259–3272. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zeiger, H. J., Vidal, J., Cheng, T. K., Ippen, E. P., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. (1992). Phys. Rev. B, 45, 768–778. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zhu, D., Robert, A., Henighan, T., Lemke, H. T., Chollet, M., Glownia, J. M., Reis, D. A. & Trigo, M. (2015). Phys. Rev. B, 92, 054303. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zijlstra, E. S., Kalitsov, A., Zier, T. & Garcia, M. E. (2013). Adv. Mater. 25, 5605–5608. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zürch, M., Chang, H.-T., Borja, L. J., Kraus, P. M., Cushing, S. K., Gandman, A., Kaplan, C. J., Oh, M. H., Prell, J. S., Prendergast, D., Pemmaraju, C. D., Neumark, D. M. & Leone, S. R. (2017). Nat. Commun. 8, 15734. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.