view article

Figure 2
Specific methodologies underpinning microcrystallography (µxt). (a)–(c) Crystallogenesis requires approaches that differ from `traditional' methods, including (a) in-chip and (b) in-cell crystallization, or (c) in-LCP crystallization and the HiLiDe method for membrane proteins. Presentation of the crystals to an X-ray beam requires specific approaches using (d) meshes, grids and small supports; (e) large-area chips; (f) jets; (g) or other combined technologies. (h)–(j) Diffraction experiments are possible thanks to the development of microfocus beamlines at synchrotrons and free-electron laser facilities across the world. (j) MicroED emerges as an alternative to X-ray diffraction for the smallest microcrystals. Figure adapted from the literature (Gicquel et al., 2018BB17; Heymann et al., 2014BB20; De Wijn et al., 2019BB11; Schönherr et al., 2015BB45; Manji & Friesen, 2001BB34; Hasegawa et al., 2011BB19; Båth, 2022BB7; Trampari et al., 2021BB52; Illava et al., 2021BB23; Owen et al., 2017BB38; Oberthuer et al., 2017BB36; Beyerlein et al., 2017BB2; Tsujino & Tomizaki, 2016BB53) with permission. Images in (d) and (f) were provided by MiTeGen and SerialX, respectively.

IUCrJ
Volume 11| Part 4| July 2024| Pages 476-485
ISSN: 2052-2525