|
Figure 2
Comparison of FSC-0.5 for maps denoised with the crefDenoiser, EMReady and TopazTomo methods. The difference in FSC-0.5 values between denoised–noisy half-maps and noisy-to-noisy half-maps (M1, M2) for 50 EMDB test entries is shown as box-whisker plots for (a) non-masked and (b) masked maps. The plots depict distributions of FSC-0.5 difference for each method. The solid central line depicts the median and the boxes represent the interquartile range. |
IUCrJ
ISSN: 2052-2525
CRYO | EM
Open
access
![Open Access](/logos/open.png)