Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105033871/av1269sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105033871/av1269Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 294315
Single crystals of (I) were prepared by the reaction of Cu2(O2CH)4(2-mpy)2 (2-mpy is 2-methylpyridine) and 2-hydroxypyridine in acetonitrile. 2-Hydroxypyridine (0.38 g, 4 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (27 ml). Cu2(O2CH)4(2-mpy)2 (0.31 g, 0.8 mmol) was added in the solution during mixing and heating. The undissolved solid residue was filtered off and the resulting solution was left to stand at 278 K for 24 h. Green crystals obtained from the solution were used for X-ray diffraction. The compound is very unstable in air.
All H atoms, with the exception of two bonded to the C atom in the acetonitrile solvent molecule, were located from difference Fourier maps; the remaining two positions were calculated. Owing to the disorder of the acetonitrile solvent molecules, their C and N atoms were refined isotropically, together with the occupancy parameter, which was constrained to be equal for all atoms of acetonitrile. The solvent H-atom parameters were not refined.
Copper(II) carboxylates are well known to form a variety of structures, even with ligands of the same homologous series. One of the objectives of our recent work involved the development of new synthetic methods for the preparation of copper(II) formate with additional N– and O-donor ligands. We present here a new structure of cooper(II) formate with 2-hydroxypyridine. It is interesting that among a large number of structures of dimeric copper(II) carboxylates, there are only two structures containing this ligand, viz. tetrakis(µ-acetato)bis(2-pyridone)dicopper (Blake et al., 1991; Sun et al., 1994), which has four bidentate acetate bridges and two apical 2-pyridone ligands, and tetrakis(µ-2α-pyridinato-N,O)bis(dimethylsulfoxide-O)dicooper (Yeh et al., 1987), which has four N,O-bidentate pyridinate bridges and two apical dimethysulfoxide ligands. In contrast to these two structures, the title compound, (I), whose structure consists of Cu2(O2CH)2(C5H5NO)2(C5H4NO)2 dimers and acetonitrile solvent molecules (Fig. 1), contains 2-hydroxypyridine as a monodentate apical ligand and its anion as a bidentate bridging ligand. The dimeric unit is centrosymmetric, with two apical 2-pyridone ligands coordinated through atom O2, and two N,O-bidentate 2-pyridinolate and two bidentate formate syn--syn bridges. This compound is the first example among dimeric copper(II) formates with four bridging ligands where one or more formate bridges are replaced by some other kind of ligand, i.e. pyridinolate. Different kinds of bridges within dimers are also uncommon within the structures of other copper(II) carboxylates.
In (I), the coordination polyhedron of the Cu atom is a slightly distorted square pyramid; τ is 0.023 (Addison et al., 1984). The Cu atom is displaced by 0.188 (1) Å from the basal N2/O4/O11/O12 plane. The Cu···Cu separation within the dimer is 2.6468 (4) Å, which is comparable to those in other dimeric copper(II) formates (Uekusa et al., 1989; Yamanaka et al., 1991; Cejudo et al., 2002; Sapina et al., 1994). Atom N1 from the apical 2-pyridone ligand is a donor of a hydrogen bond to atom O4 from the bridging pyridinolate ligand of the same complex. The N1···O4 distance is 2.768 (3) Å. Fig. 2 presents the packing of the title compound looking along the c axis. The apical pyridone ligand forms stacking interactions with the two adjacent symmetry-related [(x, 1 - y, -1/2 + z) and (x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z)] 2-pyridone ligands. The dihedral angles between π-stacked rings are in both cases 0.48°, and the distances between the ring centroids are 3.622 (2) Å. The stacking interactions run along the c axis and can be seen in the projection along this direction shown in Fig. 2 as the overlapping of apical 2-pyridone rings. Fig. 2 also shows that the structure is layered, where the layers of dimeric complex molecules are separated by the layers of solvent acetonitrile molecules. All layers are parallel to the ac plane and stack along the [100] direction.
On exposure to air and in the absence of the solvent, the acetonitrile molecules can easily leave the structure, causing the destruction of the crystal. Despite the fact that the single-crystal was protected by silicon grease and was transferred very quickly from the mother liquor into the stream of cold nitrogen, some acetonitrile molecules succeeded in escaping from the crystal. As a consequence, the sites of the acetonitrile molecules are only partially [0.51 (3)] occupied, resulting in there being 1.02 (3) of solvate molecules per one dimeric complex molecule. The disorder in that part of the structure is also exhibited in the deviation of the C31—C32 bond length [1.326 (17) Å] from the expected Csp3—Csp1 [1.470 (13) Å] (Allen et al., 1987). The distance 1.12 (2) Å of C31—N3 bond is close to 1.136 (10) Å, the reported distance of a Csp1≡ N bond (Allen et al., 1987). It seems that at the decay of the crystal structure, the dimeric complex does not decompose. This is supported by the results of elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and gravimetric measurement, which will be published elsewhere. Unfortunately, attempts to prepare suitable crystals of such complexes with no or with other kinds of solvent (acetone, water, ethanol and chloroform) were unsuccessful.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO-SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: Xtal3.6 (Hall et al., 1999); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: Xtal3.6 and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
[Cu2(CHO2)2(C5H4NO)2(C5H5NO)2]·1.02(3)CH3CN | F(000) = 1297.8 |
Mr = 637.39 | Dx = 1.495 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -c 2yc | Cell parameters from 3136 reflections |
a = 26.1571 (8) Å | θ = 2.6–27.5° |
b = 15.3971 (5) Å | µ = 1.55 mm−1 |
c = 7.1673 (2) Å | T = 150 K |
β = 101.078 (2)° | Plate, green |
V = 2832.80 (15) Å3 | 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm |
Z = 4 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 2605 reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.026 |
ω scans with κ offsets | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.9° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor 1997) | h = −33→33 |
Tmin = 0.73, Tmax = 0.96 | k = −19→19 |
13938 measured reflections | l = −9→9 |
3182 independent reflections |
Refinement on F | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | 5 constraints |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | Only H-atom displacement parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.044 | A Regina weighting scheme (Wang & Robertson, 1985) using the normal
equation of the second order was applied for individual reflections so that w =
A(0,0) + A(1,0)V(F) + A(0,1)V(S) + A(2,0)V(F)2 + A(0,2)V(S)2 +
A(1,1)V(F)V(S), where V(F) = Fobs/Fobs(max), Fobs(max) = 274.38 and V(S) = (sinθ/λ)/((sinθ/λ)(max)), (sinθ/λ)(max) = 0.6486. The parameters were: A(0,0) = 151.7662, A(1,0) = 0.0099395, A(0,1) = -587.9600, A(2,0) = -0.0003962, A(1,1) = 0.0243166 , A(0,2) = 570.2360. |
S = 1.09 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
2986 reflections | Δρmax = 1.39 e Å−3 |
186 parameters | Δρmin = −1.16 e Å−3 |
[Cu2(CHO2)2(C5H4NO)2(C5H5NO)2]·1.02(3)CH3CN | V = 2832.80 (15) Å3 |
Mr = 637.39 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 26.1571 (8) Å | µ = 1.55 mm−1 |
b = 15.3971 (5) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 7.1673 (2) Å | 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm |
β = 101.078 (2)° |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 3182 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor 1997) | 2605 reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2) |
Tmin = 0.73, Tmax = 0.96 | Rint = 0.026 |
13938 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.044 | Only H-atom displacement parameters refined |
S = 1.09 | Δρmax = 1.39 e Å−3 |
2986 reflections | Δρmin = −1.16 e Å−3 |
186 parameters |
Geometry. #<< supplementary material PLANE NUMBER 1 (O11 O4 O12 N2) =============== EQUATION OF PLANE AS AX+BY+CZ=D, XYZ IN FRACTIONAL AND ORTHOGONAL UNITS A B C D ESDA ESDB ESDC ESDD 21.8681 6.9070 1.0710 8.3264. 0122. 0122. 0060. 0021. 8812. 4486. 1494 8.3264. 0005. 0008. 0008. 0021 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Cu | 0.296520 (10) | 0.28380 (2) | 0.06522 (5) | 0.0226 (2) | |
O2 | 0.37017 (9) | 0.34656 (15) | 0.1603 (3) | 0.0300 (10) | |
O4 | 0.26485 (9) | 0.38256 (14) | −0.0887 (3) | 0.0295 (9) | |
O11 | 0.26384 (9) | 0.32483 (15) | 0.2805 (3) | 0.0306 (9) | |
O12 | 0.31537 (9) | 0.23085 (15) | −0.1654 (3) | 0.0327 (10) | |
N1 | 0.34442 (10) | 0.48710 (18) | 0.0994 (3) | 0.0259 (10) | |
N2 | 0.31591 (10) | 0.17498 (17) | 0.2102 (3) | 0.0255 (10) | |
C1 | 0.21706 (13) | 0.30906 (19) | 0.2862 (4) | 0.0283 (13) | |
C2 | 0.38007 (12) | 0.4258 (2) | 0.1797 (4) | 0.0251 (12) | |
C3 | 0.42796 (12) | 0.4602 (2) | 0.2854 (4) | 0.0296 (13) | |
C4 | 0.43547 (13) | 0.5478 (2) | 0.3026 (4) | 0.0330 (14) | |
C5 | 0.39657 (15) | 0.6071 (2) | 0.2180 (5) | 0.0346 (14) | |
C6 | 0.35132 (13) | 0.5745 (2) | 0.1168 (4) | 0.0316 (13) | |
C7 | 0.21953 (12) | 0.39037 (19) | −0.1965 (4) | 0.0247 (12) | |
C8 | 0.20616 (13) | 0.4681 (2) | −0.3034 (5) | 0.0302 (13) | |
C9 | 0.15793 (15) | 0.4773 (2) | −0.4118 (5) | 0.0348 (14) | |
C10 | 0.12150 (15) | 0.4097 (3) | −0.4239 (5) | 0.0399 (16) | |
C11 | 0.36367 (14) | 0.1658 (2) | 0.3219 (5) | 0.0370 (15) | |
H1 | 0.20428 | 0.32773 | 0.39374 | 0.026 (9)* | |
H3 | 0.45486 | 0.42142 | 0.34431 | 0.041 (11)* | |
H4 | 0.46517 | 0.56837 | 0.36297 | 0.050 (13)* | |
H5 | 0.40201 | 0.66857 | 0.23149 | 0.029 (9)* | |
H6 | 0.32124 | 0.60740 | 0.06261 | 0.038 (11)* | |
H8 | 0.23170 | 0.50652 | −0.28377 | 0.040 (11)* | |
H9 | 0.14159 | 0.51762 | −0.50460 | 0.025 (9)* | |
H10 | 0.08674 | 0.41603 | −0.49991 | 0.037 (11)* | |
H11 | 0.38862 | 0.22037 | 0.33576 | 0.040 (11)* | |
H1' | 0.31541 | 0.46660 | 0.02972 | 0.018 (8)* | |
C31 | 0.4803 (4) | 0.2109 (7) | −0.0315 (13) | 0.056 (3)* | .51 (3) |
C32 | 0.4410 (5) | 0.1555 (9) | −0.044 (2) | 0.075 (4)* | .51 (3) |
N3 | 0.5118 (7) | 0.2603 (12) | −0.033 (2) | 0.100 (5)* | .51 (3) |
H321 | 0.45071 | 0.11310 | 0.06040 | 0.11800* | .51 (3) |
H322 | 0.41020 | 0.19106 | −0.02101 | 0.11800* | .51 (3) |
H323 | 0.43234 | 0.12701 | −0.16769 | 0.11800* | .51 (3) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu | 0.0264 (2) | 0.01875 (19) | 0.0214 (2) | −0.00077 (13) | 0.00171 (11) | −0.00045 (13) |
O2 | 0.0312 (10) | 0.0263 (11) | 0.0308 (10) | −0.0022 (8) | 0.0017 (8) | −0.0007 (8) |
O4 | 0.0301 (10) | 0.0253 (10) | 0.0300 (10) | −0.0031 (8) | −0.0023 (8) | 0.0041 (8) |
O11 | 0.0341 (11) | 0.0297 (10) | 0.0268 (10) | −0.0011 (9) | 0.0032 (8) | −0.0059 (8) |
O12 | 0.0361 (11) | 0.0346 (12) | 0.0275 (10) | −0.0017 (9) | 0.0062 (9) | −0.0031 (9) |
N1 | 0.0242 (11) | 0.0281 (12) | 0.0240 (11) | −0.0017 (9) | 0.0014 (9) | 0.0006 (9) |
N2 | 0.0287 (12) | 0.0256 (11) | 0.0207 (10) | 0.0016 (10) | 0.0008 (9) | 0.0012 (9) |
C1 | 0.0384 (16) | 0.0237 (13) | 0.0232 (13) | 0.0035 (11) | 0.0068 (11) | −0.0024 (10) |
C2 | 0.0273 (13) | 0.0281 (14) | 0.0205 (11) | −0.0004 (11) | 0.0061 (10) | 0.0001 (10) |
C3 | 0.0270 (14) | 0.0345 (15) | 0.0257 (13) | −0.0021 (12) | 0.0010 (11) | 0.0015 (11) |
C4 | 0.0318 (15) | 0.0407 (17) | 0.0257 (13) | −0.0074 (13) | 0.0032 (11) | −0.0044 (12) |
C5 | 0.0415 (17) | 0.0298 (14) | 0.0326 (15) | −0.0067 (13) | 0.0076 (13) | −0.0041 (12) |
C6 | 0.0364 (16) | 0.0297 (15) | 0.0285 (13) | 0.0017 (12) | 0.0055 (12) | 0.0004 (11) |
C7 | 0.0318 (14) | 0.0223 (12) | 0.0210 (12) | −0.0001 (11) | 0.0079 (10) | −0.0015 (10) |
C8 | 0.0386 (16) | 0.0230 (13) | 0.0308 (14) | 0.0020 (12) | 0.0107 (12) | 0.0016 (11) |
C9 | 0.0413 (17) | 0.0324 (15) | 0.0310 (15) | 0.0081 (13) | 0.0077 (13) | 0.0066 (12) |
C10 | 0.0381 (17) | 0.0391 (18) | 0.0404 (17) | 0.0059 (14) | 0.0024 (13) | 0.0101 (14) |
C11 | 0.0356 (16) | 0.0343 (17) | 0.0390 (16) | −0.0005 (13) | 0.0018 (13) | 0.0049 (13) |
Cu—O2 | 2.146 (2) | C5—C6 | 1.360 (5) |
Cu—O4 | 1.966 (2) | C7—C8 | 1.428 (4) |
Cu—O11 | 2.004 (2) | C8—C9 | 1.356 (5) |
Cu—O12 | 1.988 (2) | C9—C10 | 1.403 (6) |
Cu—N2 | 1.985 (3) | C10—C11i | 1.388 (5) |
O2—C2 | 1.249 (4) | C1—H1 | 0.9421 |
O4—C7 | 1.290 (4) | C3—H3 | 0.9569 |
O11—C1 | 1.256 (4) | C4—H4 | 0.8729 |
O12—C1i | 1.251 (4) | C5—H5 | 0.9592 |
N1—C2 | 1.373 (4) | C6—H6 | 0.9535 |
N1—C6 | 1.360 (4) | C8—H8 | 0.8831 |
N2—C11 | 1.355 (4) | C9—H9 | 0.9493 |
N2—C7i | 1.359 (4) | C10—H10 | 0.9709 |
N1—H1' | 0.8827 | C11—H11 | 1.0568 |
N3—C31 | 1.12 (2) | C31—C32 | 1.326 (17) |
C2—C3 | 1.435 (4) | C32—H321 | 0.9887 |
C3—C4 | 1.365 (4) | C32—H322 | 1.0134 |
C4—C5 | 1.414 (5) | C32—H323 | 0.9760 |
O2—Cu—O4 | 94.92 (9) | O4—C7—N2i | 120.7 (3) |
O2—Cu—O11 | 95.93 (9) | C7—C8—C9 | 120.0 (3) |
O2—Cu—O12 | 95.61 (9) | C8—C9—C10 | 120.3 (3) |
O2—Cu—N2 | 95.18 (10) | C9—C10—C11i | 118.1 (3) |
O4—Cu—O11 | 89.55 (9) | N2—C11—C10i | 122.1 (3) |
O4—Cu—O12 | 89.76 (9) | O11—C1—H1 | 117.95 |
O4—Cu—N2 | 169.82 (10) | O12i—C1—H1 | 114.59 |
O11—Cu—O12 | 168.46 (10) | C2—C3—H3 | 119.73 |
O11—Cu—N2 | 88.11 (10) | C4—C3—H3 | 119.72 |
O12—Cu—N2 | 90.56 (9) | C3—C4—H4 | 120.14 |
Cu—O2—C2 | 129.0 (2) | C5—C4—H4 | 118.48 |
Cu—O4—C7 | 130.4 (2) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.88 |
Cu—O11—C1 | 121.77 (19) | C6—C5—H5 | 121.00 |
Cu—O12—C1i | 122.2 (2) | N1—C6—H6 | 113.81 |
C2—N1—C6 | 125.0 (3) | C5—C6—H6 | 125.93 |
Cu—N2—C11 | 120.7 (2) | C7—C8—H8 | 112.10 |
Cu—N2—C7i | 119.0 (2) | C9—C8—H8 | 127.83 |
C7i—N2—C11 | 120.3 (3) | C8—C9—H9 | 135.55 |
C2—N1—H1' | 115.60 | C10—C9—H9 | 103.47 |
C6—N1—H1' | 119.35 | C9—C10—H10 | 120.80 |
O11—C1—O12i | 127.4 (3) | C11i—C10—H10 | 121.09 |
N1—C2—C3 | 114.9 (3) | N2—C11—H11 | 117.07 |
O2—C2—C3 | 124.1 (3) | C10i—C11—H11 | 120.75 |
O2—C2—N1 | 121.0 (3) | N3—C31—C32 | 175.0 (13) |
C2—C3—C4 | 120.6 (3) | C31—C32—H321 | 106.90 |
C3—C4—C5 | 121.3 (3) | C31—C32—H322 | 105.77 |
C4—C5—C6 | 118.1 (3) | C31—C32—H323 | 113.10 |
N1—C6—C5 | 120.0 (3) | H321—C32—H322 | 109.29 |
N2i—C7—C8 | 119.3 (3) | H321—C32—H323 | 111.82 |
O4—C7—C8 | 120.1 (3) | H322—C32—H323 | 109.73 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu2(CHO2)2(C5H4NO)2(C5H5NO)2]·1.02(3)CH3CN |
Mr | 637.39 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, b, c (Å) | 26.1571 (8), 15.3971 (5), 7.1673 (2) |
β (°) | 101.078 (2) |
V (Å3) | 2832.80 (15) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.55 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.03 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor 1997) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.73, 0.96 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [F2 > 2σ(F2)] reflections | 13938, 3182, 2605 |
Rint | 0.026 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.050, 0.044, 1.09 |
No. of reflections | 2986 |
No. of parameters | 186 |
H-atom treatment | Only H-atom displacement parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 1.39, −1.16 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000), DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO-SMN, SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), Xtal3.6 (Hall et al., 1999), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), Xtal3.6 and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
Cu—O2 | 2.146 (2) | O11—C1 | 1.256 (4) |
Cu—O4 | 1.966 (2) | O12—C1i | 1.251 (4) |
Cu—O11 | 2.004 (2) | N1—C2 | 1.373 (4) |
Cu—O12 | 1.988 (2) | N1—C6 | 1.360 (4) |
Cu—N2 | 1.985 (3) | N2—C11 | 1.355 (4) |
O2—C2 | 1.249 (4) | N2—C7i | 1.359 (4) |
O4—C7 | 1.290 (4) | N3—C31 | 1.12 (2) |
O2—Cu—O4 | 94.92 (9) | C2—N1—C6 | 125.0 (3) |
O2—Cu—O11 | 95.93 (9) | Cu—N2—C11 | 120.7 (2) |
O2—Cu—O12 | 95.61 (9) | Cu—N2—C7i | 119.0 (2) |
O2—Cu—N2 | 95.18 (10) | C7i—N2—C11 | 120.3 (3) |
O4—Cu—O11 | 89.55 (9) | O11—C1—O12i | 127.4 (3) |
O4—Cu—O12 | 89.76 (9) | N1—C2—C3 | 114.9 (3) |
O4—Cu—N2 | 169.82 (10) | O2—C2—C3 | 124.1 (3) |
O11—Cu—O12 | 168.46 (10) | O2—C2—N1 | 121.0 (3) |
O11—Cu—N2 | 88.11 (10) | N1—C6—C5 | 120.0 (3) |
O12—Cu—N2 | 90.56 (9) | N2i—C7—C8 | 119.3 (3) |
Cu—O2—C2 | 129.0 (2) | O4—C7—C8 | 120.1 (3) |
Cu—O4—C7 | 130.4 (2) | O4—C7—N2i | 120.7 (3) |
Cu—O11—C1 | 121.77 (19) | N2—C11—C10i | 122.1 (3) |
Cu—O12—C1i | 122.2 (2) | N3—C31—C32 | 175.0 (13) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z. |
Copper(II) carboxylates are well known to form a variety of structures, even with ligands of the same homologous series. One of the objectives of our recent work involved the development of new synthetic methods for the preparation of copper(II) formate with additional N– and O-donor ligands. We present here a new structure of cooper(II) formate with 2-hydroxypyridine. It is interesting that among a large number of structures of dimeric copper(II) carboxylates, there are only two structures containing this ligand, viz. tetrakis(µ-acetato)bis(2-pyridone)dicopper (Blake et al., 1991; Sun et al., 1994), which has four bidentate acetate bridges and two apical 2-pyridone ligands, and tetrakis(µ-2α-pyridinato-N,O)bis(dimethylsulfoxide-O)dicooper (Yeh et al., 1987), which has four N,O-bidentate pyridinate bridges and two apical dimethysulfoxide ligands. In contrast to these two structures, the title compound, (I), whose structure consists of Cu2(O2CH)2(C5H5NO)2(C5H4NO)2 dimers and acetonitrile solvent molecules (Fig. 1), contains 2-hydroxypyridine as a monodentate apical ligand and its anion as a bidentate bridging ligand. The dimeric unit is centrosymmetric, with two apical 2-pyridone ligands coordinated through atom O2, and two N,O-bidentate 2-pyridinolate and two bidentate formate syn--syn bridges. This compound is the first example among dimeric copper(II) formates with four bridging ligands where one or more formate bridges are replaced by some other kind of ligand, i.e. pyridinolate. Different kinds of bridges within dimers are also uncommon within the structures of other copper(II) carboxylates.
In (I), the coordination polyhedron of the Cu atom is a slightly distorted square pyramid; τ is 0.023 (Addison et al., 1984). The Cu atom is displaced by 0.188 (1) Å from the basal N2/O4/O11/O12 plane. The Cu···Cu separation within the dimer is 2.6468 (4) Å, which is comparable to those in other dimeric copper(II) formates (Uekusa et al., 1989; Yamanaka et al., 1991; Cejudo et al., 2002; Sapina et al., 1994). Atom N1 from the apical 2-pyridone ligand is a donor of a hydrogen bond to atom O4 from the bridging pyridinolate ligand of the same complex. The N1···O4 distance is 2.768 (3) Å. Fig. 2 presents the packing of the title compound looking along the c axis. The apical pyridone ligand forms stacking interactions with the two adjacent symmetry-related [(x, 1 - y, -1/2 + z) and (x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z)] 2-pyridone ligands. The dihedral angles between π-stacked rings are in both cases 0.48°, and the distances between the ring centroids are 3.622 (2) Å. The stacking interactions run along the c axis and can be seen in the projection along this direction shown in Fig. 2 as the overlapping of apical 2-pyridone rings. Fig. 2 also shows that the structure is layered, where the layers of dimeric complex molecules are separated by the layers of solvent acetonitrile molecules. All layers are parallel to the ac plane and stack along the [100] direction.
On exposure to air and in the absence of the solvent, the acetonitrile molecules can easily leave the structure, causing the destruction of the crystal. Despite the fact that the single-crystal was protected by silicon grease and was transferred very quickly from the mother liquor into the stream of cold nitrogen, some acetonitrile molecules succeeded in escaping from the crystal. As a consequence, the sites of the acetonitrile molecules are only partially [0.51 (3)] occupied, resulting in there being 1.02 (3) of solvate molecules per one dimeric complex molecule. The disorder in that part of the structure is also exhibited in the deviation of the C31—C32 bond length [1.326 (17) Å] from the expected Csp3—Csp1 [1.470 (13) Å] (Allen et al., 1987). The distance 1.12 (2) Å of C31—N3 bond is close to 1.136 (10) Å, the reported distance of a Csp1≡ N bond (Allen et al., 1987). It seems that at the decay of the crystal structure, the dimeric complex does not decompose. This is supported by the results of elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and gravimetric measurement, which will be published elsewhere. Unfortunately, attempts to prepare suitable crystals of such complexes with no or with other kinds of solvent (acetone, water, ethanol and chloroform) were unsuccessful.