Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807047022/cv2307sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807047022/cv2307Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 663663
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.009 Å
- R factor = 0.064
- wR factor = 0.160
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.4
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT048_ALERT_1_C MoietyFormula Not Given ........................ ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C11 PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 9
Alert level G PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of N2 = ... S PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cu1 (2) 2.22 PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 3 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For related structures, see: Diao et al. (2007); Diao & Li (2007); Wei (2005a,b); Wei & Wang (2006).
Salicyaldehyde (1.0 mmol, 122.1 mg), N-methylethane-1,2-diamine (1.0 mmol, 74.0 mg), NH4NCS (1.0 mmol, 7.6 mg) and Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O (1.0 mmol, 199.1 mg) were dissolved in a methanol solution (150 ml). The mixture was refluxed at 340 K for about 1 h to give a clear blue solution. After keeping the cooled resulting solution in dark for five days, blue needle-shaped crystals were formed.
Atom H2 attached to N2 was located from a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically, with N–H distance restrained to 0.90 (3) Å. Other H atoms were placed geometrically, with C–H distances in the range 0.93–0.97 Å, and with Uiso(H) set to 1.2Ueq(C) and 1.5Ueq(methyl C).
In continuation of our study of copper complexes with Shiff base ligands (Wei, 2005a,b; Wei & Wang, 2006), we report here the crystal structure of the title compound- a new dinuclear copper(II) complex (Fig. 1).
Each Cu atom in the complex is pentacoordinate in a square pyramidal geometry, with one phenolic O, one imine N, and one amine N atoms of one Schiff base ligand, and with one N atom of a thiocyanate ligand defining the basal plane, and with one N atom of another thiocyanate ligand occupying the apical position. The thiocyanate ligands adopt end-on coordination mode, with the Cu···Cu distance of 3.255 (2) Å. The coordinate bond lengths and angles are comparable with those observed in other Schiff base copper(II) complexes (Diao, Shu et al., 2007; Diao & Li, 2007).
For related structures, see: Diao et al. (2007); Diao & Li (2007); Wei (2005a,b); Wei & Wang (2006).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).
[Cu2(NCS)2(C10H13N2O)2] | F(000) = 612 |
Mr = 597.69 | Dx = 1.602 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 8.3305 (19) Å | Cell parameters from 944 reflections |
b = 16.982 (4) Å | θ = 2.3–24.9° |
c = 9.137 (2) Å | µ = 1.92 mm−1 |
β = 106.562 (3)° | T = 298 K |
V = 1239.0 (5) Å3 | Needle, blue |
Z = 2 | 0.20 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2431 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1510 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.087 |
ω scans | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.4° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.700, Tmax = 0.894 | k = −20→20 |
9340 measured reflections | l = −11→11 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.064 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.160 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0643P)2 + 0.4135P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2431 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
158 parameters | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3 |
[Cu2(NCS)2(C10H13N2O)2] | V = 1239.0 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 597.69 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.3305 (19) Å | µ = 1.92 mm−1 |
b = 16.982 (4) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 9.137 (2) Å | 0.20 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm |
β = 106.562 (3)° |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2431 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1510 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.700, Tmax = 0.894 | Rint = 0.087 |
9340 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.064 | 1 restraint |
wR(F2) = 0.160 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
2431 reflections | Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3 |
158 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu1 | 0.96892 (9) | 0.04411 (4) | 0.33613 (8) | 0.0410 (3) | |
S1 | 1.4907 (3) | 0.09746 (15) | 0.6792 (3) | 0.1066 (10) | |
O1 | 1.0498 (5) | −0.0513 (2) | 0.2719 (4) | 0.0443 (10) | |
N1 | 0.7859 (6) | 0.0530 (3) | 0.1529 (5) | 0.0398 (12) | |
N2 | 0.8447 (7) | 0.1282 (3) | 0.4207 (5) | 0.0463 (13) | |
N3 | 1.1753 (7) | 0.0566 (3) | 0.4992 (6) | 0.0558 (15) | |
C1 | 0.8475 (8) | −0.0616 (3) | 0.0253 (7) | 0.0412 (14) | |
C2 | 0.9862 (7) | −0.0881 (3) | 0.1430 (6) | 0.0372 (14) | |
C3 | 1.0614 (9) | −0.1608 (4) | 0.1219 (8) | 0.0530 (17) | |
H3 | 1.1495 | −0.1808 | 0.2000 | 0.064* | |
C4 | 1.0052 (10) | −0.2015 (4) | −0.0123 (9) | 0.066 (2) | |
H4 | 1.0556 | −0.2491 | −0.0237 | 0.079* | |
C5 | 0.8739 (10) | −0.1731 (5) | −0.1324 (9) | 0.070 (2) | |
H5 | 0.8393 | −0.2008 | −0.2238 | 0.084* | |
C6 | 0.7964 (9) | −0.1042 (4) | −0.1144 (7) | 0.0562 (18) | |
H6 | 0.7093 | −0.0851 | −0.1944 | 0.067* | |
C7 | 0.7571 (7) | 0.0073 (3) | 0.0369 (6) | 0.0406 (14) | |
H7 | 0.6687 | 0.0207 | −0.0475 | 0.049* | |
C8 | 0.6778 (8) | 0.1198 (4) | 0.1574 (7) | 0.0503 (16) | |
H8A | 0.5665 | 0.1106 | 0.0896 | 0.060* | |
H8B | 0.7224 | 0.1672 | 0.1243 | 0.060* | |
C9 | 0.6698 (8) | 0.1295 (4) | 0.3187 (7) | 0.0554 (17) | |
H9A | 0.6163 | 0.1791 | 0.3295 | 0.066* | |
H9B | 0.6054 | 0.0871 | 0.3451 | 0.066* | |
C10 | 0.9218 (9) | 0.2060 (4) | 0.4491 (8) | 0.072 (2) | |
H10A | 0.9340 | 0.2272 | 0.3554 | 0.108* | |
H10B | 1.0299 | 0.2018 | 0.5224 | 0.108* | |
H10C | 0.8521 | 0.2403 | 0.4881 | 0.108* | |
C11 | 1.3052 (9) | 0.0744 (4) | 0.5740 (7) | 0.0510 (17) | |
H2 | 0.841 (9) | 0.110 (4) | 0.512 (4) | 0.080* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu1 | 0.0387 (4) | 0.0473 (5) | 0.0355 (4) | 0.0051 (4) | 0.0082 (3) | −0.0031 (4) |
S1 | 0.0748 (16) | 0.1044 (19) | 0.1027 (17) | −0.0400 (14) | −0.0359 (13) | 0.0478 (15) |
O1 | 0.050 (3) | 0.049 (3) | 0.033 (2) | 0.011 (2) | 0.0107 (19) | −0.0028 (19) |
N1 | 0.034 (3) | 0.045 (3) | 0.041 (3) | 0.008 (2) | 0.011 (2) | 0.010 (2) |
N2 | 0.054 (3) | 0.044 (3) | 0.042 (3) | 0.003 (3) | 0.017 (3) | −0.010 (2) |
N3 | 0.047 (3) | 0.072 (4) | 0.047 (3) | 0.007 (3) | 0.011 (3) | −0.007 (3) |
C1 | 0.040 (4) | 0.044 (4) | 0.046 (4) | −0.014 (3) | 0.021 (3) | −0.006 (3) |
C2 | 0.041 (4) | 0.045 (4) | 0.032 (3) | −0.004 (3) | 0.020 (3) | 0.006 (3) |
C3 | 0.069 (5) | 0.042 (4) | 0.057 (4) | 0.006 (3) | 0.034 (4) | 0.003 (3) |
C4 | 0.085 (6) | 0.049 (4) | 0.078 (5) | −0.008 (4) | 0.048 (5) | −0.013 (4) |
C5 | 0.087 (6) | 0.076 (5) | 0.064 (5) | −0.036 (5) | 0.050 (5) | −0.037 (4) |
C6 | 0.059 (4) | 0.077 (5) | 0.039 (4) | −0.017 (4) | 0.024 (3) | −0.009 (4) |
C7 | 0.042 (4) | 0.050 (4) | 0.026 (3) | −0.003 (3) | 0.004 (3) | 0.002 (3) |
C8 | 0.048 (4) | 0.056 (4) | 0.044 (4) | 0.010 (3) | 0.009 (3) | 0.006 (3) |
C9 | 0.042 (4) | 0.059 (4) | 0.067 (5) | 0.011 (3) | 0.018 (3) | −0.003 (4) |
C10 | 0.078 (6) | 0.058 (5) | 0.084 (5) | 0.001 (4) | 0.032 (4) | −0.016 (4) |
C11 | 0.050 (4) | 0.056 (4) | 0.041 (4) | −0.001 (3) | 0.005 (3) | 0.008 (3) |
Cu1—O1 | 1.910 (4) | C3—C4 | 1.369 (9) |
Cu1—N1 | 1.922 (5) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
Cu1—N3 | 1.940 (6) | C4—C5 | 1.396 (10) |
Cu1—N2 | 2.041 (5) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
S1—C11 | 1.617 (7) | C5—C6 | 1.368 (10) |
O1—C2 | 1.305 (6) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
N1—C7 | 1.280 (7) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
N1—C8 | 1.457 (7) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
N2—C10 | 1.459 (8) | C8—C9 | 1.503 (8) |
N2—C9 | 1.490 (8) | C8—H8A | 0.9700 |
N2—H2 | 0.90 (4) | C8—H8B | 0.9700 |
N3—C11 | 1.144 (8) | C9—H9A | 0.9700 |
C1—C2 | 1.410 (8) | C9—H9B | 0.9700 |
C1—C7 | 1.411 (8) | C10—H10A | 0.9600 |
C1—C6 | 1.423 (8) | C10—H10B | 0.9600 |
C2—C3 | 1.422 (8) | C10—H10C | 0.9600 |
O1—Cu1—N1 | 93.47 (18) | C6—C5—C4 | 119.5 (6) |
O1—Cu1—N3 | 90.91 (19) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.3 |
N1—Cu1—N3 | 165.9 (2) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.3 |
O1—Cu1—N2 | 166.3 (2) | C5—C6—C1 | 120.8 (7) |
N1—Cu1—N2 | 85.0 (2) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
N3—Cu1—N2 | 93.8 (2) | C1—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
C2—O1—Cu1 | 126.6 (4) | N1—C7—C1 | 125.9 (5) |
C7—N1—C8 | 121.6 (5) | N1—C7—H7 | 117.0 |
C7—N1—Cu1 | 126.0 (4) | C1—C7—H7 | 117.0 |
C8—N1—Cu1 | 112.3 (4) | N1—C8—C9 | 108.3 (5) |
C10—N2—C9 | 113.6 (5) | N1—C8—H8A | 110.0 |
C10—N2—Cu1 | 117.1 (4) | C9—C8—H8A | 110.0 |
C9—N2—Cu1 | 106.5 (4) | N1—C8—H8B | 110.0 |
C10—N2—H2 | 106 (5) | C9—C8—H8B | 110.0 |
C9—N2—H2 | 107 (5) | H8A—C8—H8B | 108.4 |
Cu1—N2—H2 | 105 (5) | N2—C9—C8 | 107.7 (5) |
C11—N3—Cu1 | 165.6 (6) | N2—C9—H9A | 110.2 |
C2—C1—C7 | 123.1 (5) | C8—C9—H9A | 110.2 |
C2—C1—C6 | 119.5 (6) | N2—C9—H9B | 110.2 |
C7—C1—C6 | 117.4 (6) | C8—C9—H9B | 110.2 |
O1—C2—C1 | 124.7 (5) | H9A—C9—H9B | 108.5 |
O1—C2—C3 | 117.2 (5) | N2—C10—H10A | 109.5 |
C1—C2—C3 | 118.1 (5) | N2—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C4—C3—C2 | 120.6 (6) | H10A—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.7 | N2—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.7 | H10A—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C3—C4—C5 | 121.4 (7) | H10B—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.3 | N3—C11—S1 | 178.6 (7) |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.3 |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2···O1i | 0.90 (4) | 2.17 (3) | 2.993 (6) | 153 (6) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu2(NCS)2(C10H13N2O)2] |
Mr | 597.69 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.3305 (19), 16.982 (4), 9.137 (2) |
β (°) | 106.562 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1239.0 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.92 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.20 × 0.07 × 0.06 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.700, 0.894 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 9340, 2431, 1510 |
Rint | 0.087 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.064, 0.160, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 2431 |
No. of parameters | 158 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.45, −0.67 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2···O1i | 0.90 (4) | 2.17 (3) | 2.993 (6) | 153 (6) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
In continuation of our study of copper complexes with Shiff base ligands (Wei, 2005a,b; Wei & Wang, 2006), we report here the crystal structure of the title compound- a new dinuclear copper(II) complex (Fig. 1).
Each Cu atom in the complex is pentacoordinate in a square pyramidal geometry, with one phenolic O, one imine N, and one amine N atoms of one Schiff base ligand, and with one N atom of a thiocyanate ligand defining the basal plane, and with one N atom of another thiocyanate ligand occupying the apical position. The thiocyanate ligands adopt end-on coordination mode, with the Cu···Cu distance of 3.255 (2) Å. The coordinate bond lengths and angles are comparable with those observed in other Schiff base copper(II) complexes (Diao, Shu et al., 2007; Diao & Li, 2007).