Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801003038/cv6004sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801003038/cv6004Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 159865
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 193 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.004 Å
- R factor = 0.048
- wR factor = 0.129
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.3
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry General Notes
ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.916 Tmax scaled 0.916 Tmin scaled 0.811
The title compound was prepared by mixing aqueous (80%) thioglycolic acid (10 ml, 0.15 mol) and allyl alcohol (13.5 ml, 0.15 mol). When the reaction has subsided, benzene (100 ml) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (0.2 g) were added and the reaction flask fitted with a Dean–Stark trap and condenser. The solution was refluxed until no water was collected in the trap. The solid obtained was recrystallized from benzene dried in vacuo, yield 2.1 g (11%), m.p. 403.5–404.0 K. NMR (250 MHz) (CDCl3): 4.30 (t, J = 5 Hz), 3.27 (s), 2.86 (t, J = 5 Hz), 2.0 (m). Mass spectrum: 264,133, 132, 114, 89, 88, 87, 61, 46, 45. IR (ATR): 2964 (m), 1722 (s), 1460 (w), 1419 (m), 1376 (w), 1273 (m) 1220 (m), 1178 (m), 1127 (s), 1058 (m), 1015 (m), 951 (w), 876 (w), 847 (w), 797 (w), 740 (w), 713 (w). A crystal suitable for X-ray work were obtained from acetonitrile and mounted on a glass fiber using the oil-drop method (Kottke & Stalke, 1993) and data were collected at 193 K.
The intensity data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects and for absorption. All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. H atoms were located from difference Fourier maps and were refined isotropically.
Data collection: MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1993a); cell refinement: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1993b); data reduction: TEXSAN; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1994); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Fig. 1. View of the title molecule. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. |
C10H16O4S2 | Z = 1 |
Mr = 264.35 | F(000) = 140 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.450 Mg m−3 |
a = 5.3920 (18) Å | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
b = 6.858 (3) Å | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
c = 8.960 (6) Å | θ = 3.5–7.5° |
α = 71.88 (4)° | µ = 0.44 mm−1 |
β = 74.04 (3)° | T = 193 K |
γ = 85.41 (4)° | Plate, colorless |
V = 302.8 (3) Å3 | 0.40 × 0.37 × 0.20 mm |
Rigaku AFC-7S diffractometer | 1017 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.076 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1° |
ω/2θ scans | h = −6→6 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.885, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −10→10 |
2360 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections |
1082 independent reflections | intensity decay: −0.1% |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.129 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.04 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0741P)2 + 0.1359P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1082 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
105 parameters | Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.59 e Å−3 |
C10H16O4S2 | γ = 85.41 (4)° |
Mr = 264.35 | V = 302.8 (3) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 5.3920 (18) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 6.858 (3) Å | µ = 0.44 mm−1 |
c = 8.960 (6) Å | T = 193 K |
α = 71.88 (4)° | 0.40 × 0.37 × 0.20 mm |
β = 74.04 (3)° |
Rigaku AFC-7S diffractometer | 1017 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.076 |
Tmin = 0.885, Tmax = 1.000 | 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections |
2360 measured reflections | intensity decay: −0.1% |
1082 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.129 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 |
1082 reflections | Δρmin = −0.59 e Å−3 |
105 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
S1 | 0.23774 (10) | 0.32376 (8) | 0.93150 (7) | 0.0339 (3) | |
C2 | 0.3355 (4) | 0.1144 (3) | 0.8452 (3) | 0.0300 (5) | |
H2A | 0.278 (5) | −0.008 (4) | 0.936 (4) | 0.031 (6)* | |
H2B | 0.522 (6) | 0.113 (4) | 0.805 (4) | 0.041 (7)* | |
C3 | 0.2011 (4) | 0.1243 (3) | 0.7160 (3) | 0.0271 (5) | |
O4 | 0.3425 (3) | 0.2284 (3) | 0.5675 (2) | 0.0346 (4) | |
C5 | 0.2336 (5) | 0.2514 (4) | 0.4309 (3) | 0.0342 (6) | |
H5A | 0.049 (6) | 0.254 (4) | 0.467 (4) | 0.045 (8)* | |
H5B | 0.287 (6) | 0.132 (5) | 0.393 (4) | 0.045 (8)* | |
C6 | 0.3355 (4) | 0.4494 (4) | 0.3022 (3) | 0.0330 (5) | |
H6A | 0.279 (5) | 0.561 (4) | 0.350 (4) | 0.040 (7)* | |
H6B | 0.252 (6) | 0.466 (5) | 0.215 (5) | 0.059 (9)* | |
C7 | 0.6307 (4) | 0.4529 (3) | 0.2375 (3) | 0.0319 (5) | |
H7A | 0.690 (6) | 0.338 (5) | 0.193 (4) | 0.048 (8)* | |
H7B | 0.708 (6) | 0.433 (4) | 0.325 (4) | 0.044 (8)* | |
O8 | −0.0088 (3) | 0.0500 (3) | 0.7408 (2) | 0.0435 (5) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
S1 | 0.0345 (4) | 0.0308 (4) | 0.0321 (5) | −0.0044 (3) | 0.0001 (3) | −0.0103 (3) |
C2 | 0.0264 (11) | 0.0253 (11) | 0.0351 (14) | 0.0001 (8) | −0.0058 (10) | −0.0066 (10) |
C3 | 0.0249 (10) | 0.0207 (10) | 0.0336 (13) | 0.0013 (8) | −0.0049 (9) | −0.0082 (9) |
O4 | 0.0284 (8) | 0.0408 (9) | 0.0310 (10) | −0.0117 (7) | −0.0054 (7) | −0.0052 (8) |
C5 | 0.0317 (12) | 0.0387 (13) | 0.0337 (15) | −0.0072 (10) | −0.0085 (10) | −0.0112 (11) |
C6 | 0.0295 (12) | 0.0326 (12) | 0.0352 (14) | −0.0016 (9) | −0.0067 (10) | −0.0090 (11) |
C7 | 0.0307 (11) | 0.0266 (11) | 0.0350 (14) | 0.0004 (9) | −0.0032 (10) | −0.0094 (10) |
O8 | 0.0323 (9) | 0.0510 (11) | 0.0417 (12) | −0.0162 (8) | −0.0061 (8) | −0.0055 (9) |
S1—C7i | 1.812 (3) | C5—H5A | 0.96 (3) |
S1—C2 | 1.812 (2) | C5—H5B | 0.97 (3) |
C2—C3 | 1.508 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.536 (3) |
C2—H2A | 0.97 (3) | C6—H6A | 0.98 (3) |
C2—H2B | 0.97 (3) | C6—H6B | 0.97 (4) |
C3—O8 | 1.214 (3) | C7—S1i | 1.812 (3) |
C3—O4 | 1.341 (3) | C7—H7A | 0.99 (3) |
O4—C5 | 1.459 (3) | C7—H7B | 0.96 (3) |
C5—C6 | 1.507 (4) | ||
C7i—S1—C2 | 102.91 (12) | C6—C5—H5B | 112.4 (19) |
C3—C2—S1 | 111.21 (14) | H5A—C5—H5B | 109 (2) |
C3—C2—H2A | 108.8 (15) | C5—C6—C7 | 113.0 (2) |
S1—C2—H2A | 104.2 (15) | C5—C6—H6A | 107.6 (17) |
C3—C2—H2B | 112.3 (18) | C7—C6—H6A | 110.0 (16) |
S1—C2—H2B | 110.3 (16) | C5—C6—H6B | 106 (2) |
H2A—C2—H2B | 110 (2) | C7—C6—H6B | 111 (2) |
O8—C3—O4 | 123.5 (2) | H6A—C6—H6B | 108 (2) |
O8—C3—C2 | 125.2 (2) | C6—C7—S1i | 115.03 (17) |
O4—C3—C2 | 111.31 (18) | C6—C7—H7A | 110.8 (17) |
C3—O4—C5 | 117.05 (18) | S1i—C7—H7A | 103.3 (19) |
O4—C5—C6 | 107.84 (18) | C6—C7—H7B | 109.6 (19) |
O4—C5—H5A | 109.3 (19) | S1i—C7—H7B | 111.8 (19) |
C6—C5—H5A | 110.8 (18) | H7A—C7—H7B | 106 (2) |
O4—C5—H5B | 106.9 (18) | ||
C7i—S1—C2—C3 | −66.99 (18) | C3—O4—C5—C6 | 150.67 (19) |
S1—C2—C3—O8 | −86.9 (2) | O4—C5—C6—C7 | 61.0 (3) |
S1—C2—C3—O4 | 92.61 (19) | C5—C6—C7—S1i | 174.15 (16) |
O8—C3—O4—C5 | 0.1 (3) | S1—C2—C3—O4 | 92.61 (19) |
C2—C3—O4—C5 | −179.42 (17) | C3—O4—C5—C6 | 150.67 (19) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H16O4S2 |
Mr | 264.35 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 193 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.3920 (18), 6.858 (3), 8.960 (6) |
α, β, γ (°) | 71.88 (4), 74.04 (3), 85.41 (4) |
V (Å3) | 302.8 (3) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.44 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.40 × 0.37 × 0.20 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku AFC-7S diffractometer |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.885, 1.000 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2360, 1082, 1017 |
Rint | 0.076 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.600 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.048, 0.129, 1.04 |
No. of reflections | 1082 |
No. of parameters | 105 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.42, −0.59 |
Computer programs: MSC/AFC Diffractometer Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1993a), TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1993b), TEXSAN, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1994), SHELXL97.
C7i—S1—C2—C3 | −66.99 (18) | C3—O4—C5—C6 | 150.67 (19) |
S1—C2—C3—O8 | −86.9 (2) | O4—C5—C6—C7 | 61.0 (3) |
S1—C2—C3—O4 | 92.61 (19) | C5—C6—C7—S1i | 174.15 (16) |
O8—C3—O4—C5 | 0.1 (3) | S1—C2—C3—O4 | 92.61 (19) |
C2—C3—O4—C5 | −179.42 (17) | C3—O4—C5—C6 | 150.67 (19) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
In an attempt to prepare 1,4-oxathian-2-one (Koskimies, 1984), allyl alcohol and thioglycolic acid were reacted followed by acid-catalyzed esterification of the hydroxy acid formed. A crystalline product, believed to be 1,4-thiepan-2-one (Davies et al., 1977) on the basis of its NMR spectrum, was obtained. However, its mass spectrum showed a molecular ion peak of 264, suggesting the dimer. The structure of the dimer was confirmed by X-ray structure analysis as a 14-membered dilide. The formation of the 14-membered ring rather than seven-membered lactone is probably facilitated by the presence of sulfur with long C—S bonds in the hydroxy acid chain: the seven-membered lactone is more strained than the corresponding carbocyclic lactone or the 14-membered dilide. In the solid state, the compound assumes a centrosymmetric conformation where the S1—C2—C3—O4—C5—C6—C7—S1A chain is roughly gauche-gauche-anti-anti-gauche-anti-gauche. The conformation may be classified as [77] using Dale's nomenclature (Dale, 1973) with corner points at both S atoms. This unusual structure is made possible by two parallel planar ester groups: C2, C3, O8, O4 and C5 are practically in the plane. The corresponding carbon dilide 1,8-dioxacyclotetradecane-2,9-dione (Groth, 1985), as well as tridecanolactone (Wiberg et al., 1991), both crystallize in the [3434] conformation. The latter diamond-lattice conformation is also preferred by the parent hydrocarbon cyclotetradecane (Ounsworth & Weiler, 1987). Molecular-mechanics calculations (Mohamadi, 1990) showed that the X-ray conformation is 10 kJ above the global minimum. This minimum-energy conformer is also centrosymmetric and of the [3434] type, the corner points in 2, 6, 2' and 6'. The conformation is very similar to that of 1,8-dioxacyclotetradecane-2,9-dione (Groth, 1985). The main difference between X-ray structure and the minimum conformation is that the latter is square-shaped with carbonyl bonds axial with respect to the molecular plain while the X-ray conformation is oval-shaped with S atoms at the both ends and the carbonyl O atoms in the ring plane. Molecular-mechanics calculations suggest that the solid-state conformation is favored in more polar media. Analysis of vicinal coupling constants in the 1H NMR spectrum indicate that in solution no single conformation is dominating, a fact also predicted by molecular-mechanics calculations.