Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
The structure of a room-temperature phase of bis(tetramethylammonium) tetrachloropalladate(II), (C
4H
12N)
2[PdCl
4], is reported. All the H atoms were observed in a Fourier map. The presence of C—H
Cl hydrogen bonds, with H
Cl distances as short as 2.92 Å, was confirmed by vibrational spectroscopy. The symmetry of the cation and anion are
and
mmm, respectively.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 245116
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 292 K
- Mean (Pd-Cl) = 0.001 Å
- R factor = 0.022
- wR factor = 0.075
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 40.1
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C
PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ?
PLAT063_ALERT_3_C Crystal Probably too Large for Beam Size ....... 0.61 mm
PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors .... Pd1
PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H1 .. CL2 .. 3.03 Ang.
PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2 .. CL2 .. 3.14 Ang.
PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H3 .. CL1 .. 2.92 Ang.
PLAT481_ALERT_4_C Long D...A H-Bond Reported C1 .. CL2 .. 4.02 Ang.
PLAT601_ALERT_2_C Structure Contains Solvent Accessible VOIDS of . 48.00 A 3
Alert level G
ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.10
Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.553 0.814
Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.460 0.827
RR = 1.221
Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
REFLT03_ALERT_1_G ALERT: Expected hkl max differ from CIF values
From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 40.47
From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 962
From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_limit_ max hkl 12. 16. 15.
From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_limit_ min hkl -12. -16. 0.
TEST1: Expected hkl limits for theta max
Calculated maximum hkl 16. 16. 20.
Calculated minimum hkl -16. -16. -20.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
8 ALERT level C = Check and explain
2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
4 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Data collection: KM4B8 (Gałdecki et al., 1997); cell refinement: KM4B8; data reduction: JANA2000 (Petříček & Dusěk, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Cascarano et al., 1996); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).
bis(tetramethylammonium) tetrachloropalladate(II)
top
Crystal data top
(C4H12N)2[PdCl4] | Dx = 1.479 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 396.49 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å |
Tetragonal, P42/mnm | Cell parameters from 46 reflections |
Hall symbol: -P 4n 2n | θ = 10.4–14.0° |
a = 8.8281 (10) Å | µ = 1.62 mm−1 |
c = 11.4206 (10) Å | T = 292 K |
V = 890.07 (16) Å3 | Plate, red |
Z = 2 | 0.61 × 0.41 × 0.12 mm |
F(000) = 400 | |
Data collection top
XCalibur (KUMA) diffractometer | 639 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.039 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 40.5°, θmin = 2.9° |
ω/2q scans | h = −12→12 |
Absorption correction: gaussian JANA2000 (Petříček, V. & Dušek, M., 2000) | k = −16→16 |
Tmin = 0.553, Tmax = 0.814 | l = 0→15 |
5577 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 100 reflections |
962 independent reflections | intensity decay: 4.2% |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
wR(F2) = 0.075 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.12 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0375P)2 + 0.0815P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
962 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
24 parameters | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.70 e Å−3 |
9 constraints | |
Special details top
Experimental. The sample was prepared about 10 years ago. IR and Raman spectra were recorded on a FT–IR spectrometer Nicolet Magna 760
equipped with a Nicolet Nexus FT Raman module. The spectra were collected
under following conditions: IR spectrum - fluorolube mull, 2 cm${-1}$
resolution, 32 scans, Happ-Genzel apodization; Raman spectrum -
polycrystalline sample in glass vial, 2 cm${-1}$ resolution, 512 scans,
Happ-Genzel apodization, 260 mW N d:YVO4 laser excitation at 1064 nm. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. Extinction parameter if refined converged to 0.0000 (11). |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
Pd1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.04453 (13) | |
Cl1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.70113 (11) | 0.0688 (3) | |
Cl2 | 0.18511 (7) | 0.18511 (7) | 0.5000 | 0.0630 (2) | |
N1 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.2500 | 0.0505 (6) | |
C1 | 0.1211 (3) | 0.5647 (3) | 0.3257 (2) | 0.0773 (6) | |
H1 | 0.1595 | 0.4873 | 0.3767 | 0.116* | |
H2 | 0.0801 | 0.6460 | 0.3716 | 0.116* | |
H3 | 0.2018 | 0.6025 | 0.2775 | 0.116* | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
Pd1 | 0.03364 (11) | 0.03364 (11) | 0.0663 (3) | 0.00231 (12) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Cl1 | 0.0688 (4) | 0.0688 (4) | 0.0688 (6) | −0.0168 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Cl2 | 0.0514 (3) | 0.0514 (3) | 0.0862 (6) | −0.0134 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.0438 (8) | 0.0438 (8) | 0.0639 (18) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.0558 (11) | 0.0837 (15) | 0.0925 (16) | −0.0078 (11) | −0.0123 (11) | −0.0142 (14) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Pd1—Cl1 | 2.2971 (13) | N1—C1iii | 1.489 (2) |
Pd1—Cl1i | 2.2971 (13) | N1—C1iv | 1.489 (2) |
Pd1—Cl2i | 2.3110 (9) | C1—H1 | 0.9600 |
Pd1—Cl2 | 2.3110 (9) | C1—H2 | 0.9600 |
N1—C1 | 1.489 (2) | C1—H3 | 0.9600 |
N1—C1ii | 1.489 (2) | | |
| | | |
Cl1—Pd1—Cl1i | 180.0 | C1—N1—C1iv | 109.0 (2) |
Cl1—Pd1—Cl2i | 90.0 | C1ii—N1—C1iv | 109.70 (10) |
Cl1i—Pd1—Cl2i | 90.0 | C1iii—N1—C1iv | 109.70 (10) |
Cl1—Pd1—Cl2 | 90.0 | N1—C1—H1 | 109.5 |
Cl1i—Pd1—Cl2 | 90.0 | N1—C1—H2 | 109.5 |
Cl2i—Pd1—Cl2 | 180.00 (4) | H1—C1—H2 | 109.5 |
C1—N1—C1ii | 109.70 (10) | N1—C1—H3 | 109.5 |
C1—N1—C1iii | 109.70 (10) | H1—C1—H3 | 109.5 |
C1ii—N1—C1iii | 109.0 (2) | H2—C1—H3 | 109.5 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z+1; (ii) y−1/2, −x+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −y+1/2, x+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, −y+1, z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C1—H1···Cl2 | 0.96 | 3.03 | 3.939 (3) | 160 |
C1—H2···Cl2v | 0.96 | 3.14 | 4.019 (3) | 153 |
C1—H3···Cl1vi | 0.96 | 2.92 | 3.679 (3) | 137 |
Symmetry codes: (v) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (vi) −y+1/2, x+1/2, z−1/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.