Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
The title compound, [CuCl
2(C
10H
8N
2)], has twofold symmetry and the coordination geometry around the Cu
II atom is distorted square-planar. There are weak intermolecular Cu
Cl interactions, forming a chain structure in the crystal.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 242292
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.011 Å
- R factor = 0.055
- wR factor = 0.158
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.1
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C
ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90
Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.343 0.657
Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.423 0.657
RR' = 0.811
Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
PLAT061_ALERT_3_C Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.79
PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ?
PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.03
PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 11
PLAT731_ALERT_1_C Bond Calc 3.046(9), Rep 3.047(3) ...... 3.00 su-Rat
CU1 -CL2 1.555 5.565
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
6 ALERT level C = Check and explain
0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Data collection: CrystalClear (Molecular Structure Corporation & Rigaku, 2000); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXL97; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
(2,2'-Bipyridine-
κ2N,
N')dichlorocopper(II)
top
Crystal data top
[CuCl2(C10H8N2)] | F(000) = 580 |
Mr = 290.63 | Dx = 1.890 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 17.08 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 1248 reflections |
b = 8.95 (2) Å | θ = 3.6–25.0° |
c = 7.23 (2) Å | µ = 2.62 mm−1 |
β = 112.52 (3)° | T = 293 K |
V = 1021 (5) Å3 | Prism, green |
Z = 4 | 0.32 × 0.24 × 0.16 mm |
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury70 (2x2 bin mode) diffractometer | 904 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 691 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.052 |
Detector resolution: 14.6306 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.6° |
ω scans | h = −18→20 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | k = −9→10 |
Tmin = 0.343, Tmax = 0.657 | l = −8→8 |
2958 measured reflections | |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.158 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.05 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0887P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
904 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
69 parameters | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.73 e Å−3 |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
Cu1 | 0.0000 | 0.43287 (11) | 0.2500 | 0.0453 (5) | |
Cl2 | −0.08604 (10) | 0.60623 (18) | 0.0461 (2) | 0.0536 (6) | |
N1 | −0.0739 (3) | 0.2602 (5) | 0.1011 (7) | 0.0394 (12) | |
C6 | −0.0424 (4) | 0.1256 (7) | 0.1678 (9) | 0.0397 (14) | |
C5 | −0.1495 (4) | 0.2694 (8) | −0.0470 (10) | 0.0520 (17) | |
H5A | −0.1712 | 0.3653 | −0.0972 | 0.062* | |
C4 | −0.1972 (4) | 0.1461 (9) | −0.1300 (10) | 0.0598 (19) | |
H4A | −0.2514 | 0.1561 | −0.2351 | 0.072* | |
C3 | −0.0869 (5) | −0.0019 (8) | 0.0913 (10) | 0.0532 (17) | |
H3A | −0.0635 | −0.0968 | 0.1418 | 0.064* | |
C2 | −0.1656 (5) | 0.0083 (9) | −0.0588 (11) | 0.0608 (19) | |
H2A | −0.1977 | −0.0793 | −0.1126 | 0.073* | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
Cu1 | 0.0339 (7) | 0.0266 (7) | 0.0571 (8) | 0.000 | −0.0029 (5) | 0.000 |
Cl2 | 0.0487 (10) | 0.0334 (9) | 0.0599 (11) | 0.0074 (7) | 0.0000 (8) | 0.0046 (7) |
N1 | 0.030 (3) | 0.029 (3) | 0.050 (3) | 0.0023 (19) | 0.005 (2) | −0.001 (2) |
C6 | 0.037 (3) | 0.035 (4) | 0.044 (3) | −0.001 (3) | 0.013 (3) | 0.001 (2) |
C5 | 0.037 (4) | 0.045 (4) | 0.063 (4) | 0.002 (3) | 0.007 (3) | 0.001 (3) |
C4 | 0.041 (4) | 0.069 (5) | 0.056 (4) | −0.011 (4) | 0.003 (3) | −0.022 (4) |
C3 | 0.062 (4) | 0.032 (4) | 0.060 (4) | −0.008 (3) | 0.017 (4) | −0.009 (3) |
C2 | 0.064 (5) | 0.047 (4) | 0.070 (5) | −0.022 (4) | 0.024 (4) | −0.018 (4) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N1 | 2.024 (6) | C6—C6i | 1.482 (12) |
Cu1—N1i | 2.024 (6) | C5—C4 | 1.366 (10) |
Cu1—Cl2i | 2.254 (4) | C5—H5A | 0.9500 |
Cu1—Cl2 | 2.254 (4) | C4—C2 | 1.366 (11) |
Cu1—Cl2ii | 3.047 (3) | C4—H4A | 0.9500 |
N1—C5 | 1.328 (8) | C3—C2 | 1.369 (9) |
N1—C6 | 1.332 (8) | C3—H3A | 0.9500 |
C6—C3 | 1.365 (9) | C2—H2A | 0.9500 |
| | | |
N1—Cu1—N1i | 80.5 (3) | N1—C5—H5A | 118.8 |
N1—Cu1—Cl2i | 172.16 (14) | C4—C5—H5A | 118.8 |
N1i—Cu1—Cl2i | 93.4 (2) | C5—C4—C2 | 118.7 (7) |
N1—Cu1—Cl2 | 93.4 (2) | C5—C4—H4A | 120.7 |
N1i—Cu1—Cl2 | 172.16 (14) | C2—C4—H4A | 120.7 |
Cl2i—Cu1—Cl2 | 93.0 (2) | C6—C3—C2 | 119.4 (7) |
C5—N1—C6 | 118.8 (5) | C6—C3—H3A | 120.3 |
C5—N1—Cu1 | 126.7 (4) | C2—C3—H3A | 120.3 |
C6—N1—Cu1 | 114.5 (4) | C4—C2—C3 | 119.0 (6) |
N1—C6—C3 | 121.6 (6) | C4—C2—H2A | 120.5 |
N1—C6—C6i | 115.2 (3) | C3—C2—H2A | 120.5 |
C3—C6—C6i | 123.2 (4) | N1—Cu1—Cl2ii | 84.8 (3) |
N1—C5—C4 | 122.5 (6) | Cl2—Cu1—Cl2ii | 89.3 (4) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.