Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
The title compound, [Ni(CN)(C4H4N2)]n, was prepared by the hydrothermal reaction of NiCl2, KCN and pyrazine. The NiII atoms are linked via cyanide ligands into a zigzag [NC–Ni–NC]∞ chain running parallel to [010]. These chains are further connected into a three-dimensional network by bridging pyrazine ligands, which have inversion symmetry. The coordination geometry around the NiII atom is distorted tetrahedral, with one N and one C atom from the cyanide and two N atoms from the pyrazine ligands.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 621518
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.009 Å
- R factor = 0.040
- wR factor = 0.116
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.3
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level B
PLAT213_ALERT_2_B Atom C5 has ADP max/min Ratio ............. 4.90 oblat
Alert level C
PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.94
PLAT164_ALERT_4_C Nr. of Refined C-H H-Atoms in Heavy-At Struct... 4
PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for N3
PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 9
PLAT764_ALERT_4_C Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.27 Ratio
Alert level G
ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be
replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's
is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling
does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in
the study.
Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.939
Tmax scaled 0.553 Tmin scaled 0.553
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
5 ALERT level C = Check and explain
1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Bruker, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Poly[µ-cyano-µ-pyrazine-nickel(II)]
top
Crystal data top
[Ni(CN)(C4H4N2)] | F(000) = 332 |
Mr = 164.82 | Dx = 1.730 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1110 reflections |
a = 6.193 (3) Å | θ = 2.9–25.0° |
b = 9.152 (4) Å | µ = 2.96 mm−1 |
c = 11.167 (5) Å | T = 298 K |
β = 90.908 (5)° | Block, green |
V = 632.9 (5) Å3 | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm |
Z = 4 | |
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1110 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 803 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.034 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.9° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −6→7 |
Tmin = 0.589, Tmax = 0.589 | k = −10→9 |
3130 measured reflections | l = −13→12 |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.116 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.00 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.052P)2 + 1.4011P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1110 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.009 |
98 parameters | Δρmax = 0.53 e Å−3 |
4 restraints | Δρmin = −0.34 e Å−3 |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
Ni1 | 0.34379 (11) | 0.53169 (8) | 0.25378 (6) | 0.0453 (3) | |
N1 | 0.1207 (8) | 0.5209 (6) | 0.1045 (4) | 0.0539 (12) | |
N2 | 0.1255 (8) | 0.5073 (5) | 0.3980 (4) | 0.0510 (12) | |
N3 | 0.4725 (8) | 0.7275 (8) | 0.2504 (4) | 0.0706 (17) | |
C1 | 0.1828 (10) | 0.5718 (8) | 0.0000 (6) | 0.0668 (19) | |
C2 | −0.0655 (10) | 0.4494 (8) | 0.1027 (6) | 0.0629 (18) | |
C3 | −0.0618 (10) | 0.5781 (8) | 0.4071 (6) | 0.0619 (17) | |
C4 | 0.1843 (10) | 0.4293 (8) | 0.4934 (6) | 0.0604 (17) | |
C5 | 0.5375 (8) | 0.8401 (5) | 0.2479 (5) | 0.0392 (13) | |
H3 | −0.101 (9) | 0.635 (6) | 0.341 (4) | 0.067 (19)* | |
H1 | 0.304 (9) | 0.640 (7) | −0.005 (6) | 0.08 (2)* | |
H2 | −0.144 (9) | 0.423 (7) | 0.175 (4) | 0.067 (18)* | |
H4 | 0.307 (9) | 0.360 (7) | 0.484 (6) | 0.09 (2)* | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
Ni1 | 0.0463 (4) | 0.0379 (4) | 0.0517 (5) | −0.0015 (3) | 0.0037 (3) | 0.0040 (3) |
N1 | 0.047 (3) | 0.061 (3) | 0.053 (3) | −0.013 (2) | −0.007 (2) | 0.009 (2) |
N2 | 0.052 (3) | 0.052 (3) | 0.049 (3) | 0.006 (2) | 0.007 (2) | 0.012 (2) |
N3 | 0.047 (3) | 0.110 (5) | 0.054 (3) | 0.023 (3) | 0.003 (2) | −0.003 (3) |
C1 | 0.055 (4) | 0.086 (6) | 0.059 (4) | −0.026 (4) | −0.005 (3) | 0.015 (4) |
C2 | 0.057 (4) | 0.082 (5) | 0.050 (4) | −0.014 (3) | 0.003 (3) | 0.010 (3) |
C3 | 0.060 (4) | 0.073 (5) | 0.053 (4) | 0.013 (3) | 0.008 (3) | 0.016 (3) |
C4 | 0.055 (4) | 0.068 (5) | 0.059 (4) | 0.016 (3) | 0.014 (3) | 0.015 (3) |
C5 | 0.050 (3) | 0.007 (2) | 0.061 (3) | −0.014 (2) | 0.007 (2) | 0.001 (2) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ni1—C5i | 1.901 (5) | C1—C2ii | 1.362 (9) |
Ni1—N3 | 1.962 (7) | C1—H1 | 0.98 (4) |
Ni1—N2 | 2.131 (5) | C2—C1ii | 1.362 (9) |
Ni1—N1 | 2.150 (5) | C2—H2 | 0.98 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.320 (8) | C3—C4iii | 1.357 (9) |
N1—C2 | 1.325 (7) | C3—H3 | 0.93 (4) |
N2—C4 | 1.328 (8) | C4—C3iii | 1.357 (9) |
N2—C3 | 1.334 (8) | C4—H4 | 1.00 (4) |
N3—C5 | 1.107 (7) | C5—Ni1iv | 1.901 (5) |
| | | |
C5i—Ni1—N3 | 133.2 (2) | N1—C1—C2ii | 122.4 (6) |
C5i—Ni1—N2 | 99.3 (2) | N1—C1—H1 | 120 (4) |
N3—Ni1—N2 | 111.90 (19) | C2ii—C1—H1 | 116 (4) |
C5i—Ni1—N1 | 101.2 (2) | N1—C2—C1ii | 122.4 (6) |
N3—Ni1—N1 | 106.47 (19) | N1—C2—H2 | 124 (4) |
N2—Ni1—N1 | 99.99 (19) | C1ii—C2—H2 | 113 (3) |
C1—N1—C2 | 115.2 (5) | N2—C3—C4iii | 122.4 (6) |
C1—N1—Ni1 | 118.5 (4) | N2—C3—H3 | 115 (4) |
C2—N1—Ni1 | 125.6 (4) | C4iii—C3—H3 | 122 (4) |
C4—N2—C3 | 115.3 (5) | N2—C4—C3iii | 122.2 (6) |
C4—N2—Ni1 | 119.6 (4) | N2—C4—H4 | 117 (4) |
C3—N2—Ni1 | 124.7 (4) | C3iii—C4—H4 | 119 (4) |
C5—N3—Ni1 | 177.3 (5) | N3—C5—Ni1iv | 178.3 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.