Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C9H21PS, was sublimed to give crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies and shows a single 31P {1H} NMR signal in C6D6 and CD3CN of 72.25 and 78.93 p.p.m., respectively, versus H3PO4.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801004767/wn6010sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801004767/wn6010Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 165659

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.009 Å
  • R factor = 0.069
  • wR factor = 0.218
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.1

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry


Yellow Alert Alert Level C:
SHFSU_01 Alert C The absolute value of parameter shift to su ratio > 0.05 Absolute value of the parameter shift to su ratio given 0.052 Additional refinement cycles may be required.
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
1 Alert Level C = Please check

Comment top

The use of phosphines for the abstraction of sulfur from metal complexes has been used for years to promote favorable reaction chemistry (Liu et al., 1998). In our research, it was necessary to synthesize and characterize triisopropylphosphine sulfide to confirm its production in the reaction via 31P {1H} NMR techniques (Osterloh et al., 2000). As part of this characterization, the X-ray crystal structure was carried out. Related phosphine sulfides which have been characterized by X-ray diffraction include triphenylphosphine sulfide (Codding & Kerr, 1978; Foces-Foces & Llamas-Saiz, 1998) and tricyclohexylphosphine sulfide (Kerr et al., 1977; Reibenspies et al., 1996).

Experimental top

Solid sulfur (0.05 g, 1.6 mmol) was slurried in 10 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF) to which was added dropwise (36 µl, 1.6 mmol) triisopropylphosphine in 1 ml of THF. The sulfur dissolved rapidly yielding a pale yellow solution, which was filtered over celite. The nearly colorless solution was reduced in volume forming an oil. Sublimation at 273 K yielded 0.19 g (63%) of colorless block-shaped crystals. The compound was further characterized by 31P {1H} NMR; (C6D6) d 72.25 (s), (CD3CN) d 78.93 p.p.m (s).

Computing details top

Data collection: ASTRO (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1997); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: CIFTAB in SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Displacement ellipsoid plot (50% probability) of the title compound. H atoms have been drawn as spheres with arbitrary radii.
Triisopropylphosphine sulfide top
Crystal data top
C9H21PSDx = 1.069 Mg m3
Mr = 192.29Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, IbamCell parameters from 89 reflections
a = 13.573 (1) Åθ = 2.5–18.8°
b = 13.8717 (9) ŵ = 0.36 mm1
c = 12.688 (1) ÅT = 293 K
V = 2388.9 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 848
Data collection top
Bruker CCD
diffractometer
525 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.097
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.1°
0.3° ω scansh = 1614
6072 measured reflectionsk = 1615
1108 independent reflectionsl = 159
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.218H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0861P)2 + 1.4788P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1108 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.052
55 parametersΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H21PSV = 2388.9 (3) Å3
Mr = 192.29Z = 8
Orthorhombic, IbamMo Kα radiation
a = 13.573 (1) ŵ = 0.36 mm1
b = 13.8717 (9) ÅT = 293 K
c = 12.688 (1) Å0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker CCD
diffractometer
525 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
6072 measured reflectionsRint = 0.097
1108 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0690 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.218H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
1108 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
55 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Data was collected using a Bruker SMART CCD (charge coupled device) based diffractometer equipped with an LT-2 low-temperature apparatus operating at 213 K. A suitable crystal was chosen and mounted on a glass fiber using grease. Data were measured using omega scans of 0.3° per frame for 30 s, such that a hemisphere was collected. A total of 1271 frames were collected with a final resolution of 0.80 Å. The first 50 frames were recollected at the end of data collection to monitor for decay. Cell parameters were retrieved using SMART software and refined using SAINT on all observed reflections. Data reduction was performed using the SAINT software which corrects for Lp and decay. The structures are solved by the direct method using the SHELX90 program and refined by least squares method on F2 SHELXL97, incorporated in SHELXTL-PC V 5.10.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.18403 (12)0.23903 (13)0.00000.0658 (8)
S10.29883 (13)0.32501 (15)0.00000.1018 (11)
C40.0689 (5)0.3047 (6)0.00000.082 (3)
H4A0.01580.25890.00000.098*
C10.1801 (4)0.1698 (5)0.1221 (7)0.120 (3)
H1A0.17540.21840.17800.144*
C50.0585 (4)0.3666 (4)0.1002 (7)0.133 (3)
H5A0.00330.40010.09870.200*
H5B0.11140.41250.10310.200*
H5C0.06110.32570.16120.200*
C30.0872 (6)0.1046 (6)0.1374 (8)0.215 (6)
H3A0.09100.07260.20440.323*
H3B0.08450.05750.08210.323*
H3C0.02890.14390.13520.323*
C20.2698 (5)0.1158 (5)0.1464 (7)0.143 (3)
H2A0.26180.08300.21250.214*
H2B0.32450.15950.15100.214*
H2C0.28190.06950.09170.214*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0429 (10)0.0582 (12)0.0963 (17)0.0076 (8)0.0000.000
S10.0470 (11)0.0755 (15)0.183 (3)0.0175 (9)0.0000.000
C40.044 (4)0.079 (5)0.121 (8)0.017 (4)0.0000.000
C10.086 (5)0.115 (5)0.159 (7)0.012 (4)0.024 (5)0.041 (5)
C50.084 (4)0.131 (6)0.185 (8)0.002 (4)0.038 (5)0.061 (6)
C30.119 (6)0.217 (9)0.310 (15)0.056 (6)0.017 (7)0.183 (10)
C20.143 (6)0.105 (5)0.181 (10)0.018 (5)0.064 (6)0.015 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—C41.809 (8)C4—C51.540 (7)
P1—C1i1.824 (8)C4—C5i1.540 (7)
P1—C11.824 (8)C1—C21.462 (8)
P1—S11.962 (2)C1—C31.564 (8)
C4—P1—C1i103.9 (2)C5—C4—C5i111.2 (7)
C4—P1—C1103.9 (2)C5—C4—P1111.1 (4)
C1i—P1—C1116.3 (5)C5i—C4—P1111.1 (4)
C4—P1—S1112.3 (3)C2—C1—C3110.4 (6)
C1i—P1—S1110.1 (2)C2—C1—P1115.2 (6)
C1—P1—S1110.1 (2)C3—C1—P1115.7 (6)
C1i—P1—C4—C5178.9 (5)C4—P1—C1—C2174.9 (5)
C1—P1—C4—C556.8 (5)C1i—P1—C1—C271.7 (6)
S1—P1—C4—C562.2 (4)S1—P1—C1—C254.4 (6)
C1i—P1—C4—C5i56.8 (5)C4—P1—C1—C354.3 (7)
C1—P1—C4—C5i178.9 (5)C1i—P1—C1—C359.2 (8)
S1—P1—C4—C5i62.2 (4)S1—P1—C1—C3174.8 (5)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H21PS
Mr192.29
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Ibam
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)13.573 (1), 13.8717 (9), 12.688 (1)
V3)2388.9 (3)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.36
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6072, 1108, 525
Rint0.097
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.069, 0.218, 1.14
No. of reflections1108
No. of parameters55
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.25, 0.31

Computer programs: ASTRO (Bruker, 1997), SMART (Bruker, 1997), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998), CIFTAB in SHELXL97.

 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds