Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802019803/wn6123sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802019803/wn6123Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 202318
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.004 Å
- R factor = 0.061
- wR factor = 0.143
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.3
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry
The title compound was synthesized from 4-chlorobenzoic acid by refluxing it with anhydrous ethanol and concentrated sulfuric acid for 3 h to obtain ethyl 4-chlorobenzoate. This, on further reaction with hydrazine hydrate in ethanol under reflux conditions for 6 h, yielded 4-chlorobenzohydrazide. Crystallization from ethanol yielded colorless crystals (Saikachi et al., 1955).
The H atoms on N2, viz. H1N and H2N, were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely. All other atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = Ueq of the parent atom.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 1990).
C7H7ClN2O | F(000) = 352 |
Mr = 170.60 | Dx = 1.513 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Melting point: 435 K |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 15.945 (7) Å | Cell parameters from 2013 reflections |
b = 3.8449 (16) Å | θ = 2.6–27.9° |
c = 12.389 (5) Å | µ = 0.45 mm−1 |
β = 99.664 (7)° | T = 293 K |
V = 748.7 (5) Å3 | Rod, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.2 × 0.18 × 0.05 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 981 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.049 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6° |
ϕ and ω scans | h = −18→18 |
4456 measured reflections | k = −4→4 |
1329 independent reflections | l = −13→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.03 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1534P)2 + 0.0248P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1329 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.010 |
108 parameters | Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3 |
C7H7ClN2O | V = 748.7 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 170.60 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 15.945 (7) Å | µ = 0.45 mm−1 |
b = 3.8449 (16) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 12.389 (5) Å | 0.2 × 0.18 × 0.05 mm |
β = 99.664 (7)° |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 981 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
4456 measured reflections | Rint = 0.049 |
1329 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 |
1329 reflections | Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3 |
108 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cl1 | 0.45824 (5) | 0.7728 (2) | 0.37421 (8) | 0.0713 (4) | |
C7 | 0.12270 (16) | 0.3411 (6) | 0.1246 (2) | 0.0308 (6) | |
N1 | 0.05582 (12) | 0.3817 (6) | 0.17382 (17) | 0.0368 (6) | |
H1 | 0.0623 | 0.4934 | 0.2348 | 0.044* | |
N2 | −0.02547 (15) | 0.2501 (8) | 0.13093 (18) | 0.0362 (6) | |
H2N | −0.0566 (19) | 0.400 (8) | 0.091 (3) | 0.048 (9)* | |
H1N | −0.0179 (18) | 0.074 (8) | 0.093 (3) | 0.050 (10)* | |
C5 | 0.26727 (16) | 0.5765 (7) | 0.1344 (2) | 0.0407 (7) | |
H5 | 0.2561 | 0.5962 | 0.0585 | 0.049* | |
C1 | 0.36096 (17) | 0.6420 (7) | 0.3013 (3) | 0.0436 (7) | |
C4 | 0.20523 (15) | 0.4470 (6) | 0.18823 (19) | 0.0314 (6) | |
C3 | 0.22348 (16) | 0.4105 (7) | 0.3013 (2) | 0.0389 (7) | |
H3 | 0.1827 | 0.3207 | 0.3392 | 0.047* | |
C2 | 0.30190 (18) | 0.5071 (7) | 0.3571 (2) | 0.0454 (8) | |
H2 | 0.3145 | 0.4805 | 0.4327 | 0.054* | |
O1 | 0.11599 (11) | 0.2207 (5) | 0.03092 (14) | 0.0417 (5) | |
C6 | 0.34545 (18) | 0.6774 (8) | 0.1900 (3) | 0.0474 (8) | |
H6 | 0.3867 | 0.7674 | 0.1529 | 0.057* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl1 | 0.0433 (5) | 0.0794 (7) | 0.0797 (8) | −0.0065 (4) | −0.0230 (4) | −0.0099 (5) |
C7 | 0.0346 (13) | 0.0402 (14) | 0.0170 (12) | 0.0014 (11) | 0.0023 (10) | 0.0027 (11) |
N1 | 0.0308 (12) | 0.0617 (14) | 0.0171 (11) | −0.0058 (10) | 0.0011 (9) | −0.0083 (10) |
N2 | 0.0333 (12) | 0.0570 (16) | 0.0167 (11) | −0.0041 (12) | −0.0007 (10) | 0.0000 (11) |
C5 | 0.0378 (15) | 0.0584 (18) | 0.0254 (14) | −0.0015 (13) | 0.0038 (12) | 0.0038 (13) |
C1 | 0.0328 (14) | 0.0470 (16) | 0.0458 (18) | 0.0030 (13) | −0.0085 (13) | −0.0077 (14) |
C4 | 0.0327 (13) | 0.0419 (14) | 0.0187 (13) | 0.0027 (11) | 0.0017 (10) | −0.0023 (11) |
C3 | 0.0381 (15) | 0.0583 (17) | 0.0198 (13) | 0.0030 (13) | 0.0032 (11) | 0.0006 (12) |
C2 | 0.0450 (16) | 0.0627 (19) | 0.0240 (14) | 0.0064 (14) | −0.0069 (13) | −0.0052 (13) |
O1 | 0.0399 (11) | 0.0668 (13) | 0.0176 (10) | −0.0004 (9) | 0.0029 (8) | −0.0082 (8) |
C6 | 0.0353 (15) | 0.0597 (18) | 0.0470 (19) | −0.0034 (13) | 0.0061 (14) | 0.0048 (15) |
Cl1—C1 | 1.733 (3) | C5—C4 | 1.376 (4) |
C7—O1 | 1.237 (3) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C7—N1 | 1.324 (3) | C1—C2 | 1.361 (4) |
C7—C4 | 1.473 (4) | C1—C6 | 1.366 (4) |
N1—N2 | 1.410 (3) | C4—C3 | 1.389 (4) |
N1—H1 | 0.8600 | C3—C2 | 1.374 (4) |
N2—H2N | 0.86 (3) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
N2—H1N | 0.85 (3) | C2—H2 | 0.9300 |
C5—C6 | 1.375 (4) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
O1—C7—N1 | 121.8 (2) | C6—C1—Cl1 | 119.4 (2) |
O1—C7—C4 | 122.3 (2) | C5—C4—C3 | 118.7 (2) |
N1—C7—C4 | 115.9 (2) | C5—C4—C7 | 119.4 (2) |
C7—N1—N2 | 123.0 (2) | C3—C4—C7 | 121.9 (2) |
C7—N1—H1 | 118.5 | C2—C3—C4 | 119.9 (3) |
N2—N1—H1 | 118.5 | C2—C3—H3 | 120.0 |
N1—N2—H2N | 112 (2) | C4—C3—H3 | 120.0 |
N1—N2—H1N | 107 (2) | C1—C2—C3 | 119.8 (3) |
H2N—N2—H1N | 110 (3) | C1—C2—H2 | 120.1 |
C6—C5—C4 | 121.6 (3) | C3—C2—H2 | 120.1 |
C6—C5—H5 | 119.2 | C1—C6—C5 | 118.2 (3) |
C4—C5—H5 | 119.2 | C1—C6—H6 | 120.9 |
C2—C1—C6 | 121.8 (3) | C5—C6—H6 | 120.9 |
C2—C1—Cl1 | 118.8 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···N2i | 0.86 | 2.10 | 2.911 (4) | 157 |
N2—H2N···O1ii | 0.86 (3) | 2.22 (4) | 3.046 (4) | 168 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C7H7ClN2O |
Mr | 170.60 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 15.945 (7), 3.8449 (16), 12.389 (5) |
β (°) | 99.664 (7) |
V (Å3) | 748.7 (5) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.45 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.2 × 0.18 × 0.05 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4456, 1329, 981 |
Rint | 0.049 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.595 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.061, 0.143, 1.03 |
No. of reflections | 1329 |
No. of parameters | 108 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.38, −0.35 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SMART, SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996), PLATON (Spek, 1990).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···N2i | 0.86 | 2.10 | 2.911 (4) | 157 |
N2—H2N···O1ii | 0.86 (3) | 2.22 (4) | 3.046 (4) | 168 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The title compound, (I), was tested for its activity against tuberculosis `in vitro' (Bew-Hol et al., 1952), and was found to be inactive at a concentration of 10 µg ml−1 of the culture medium. Compound (I) was also used as a starting material for the synthesis of α-methyl-substituted or unsubstituted [(4-phenyl/ethyl-5-p-chlorophenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio]acetic acids which have been found to possess good anti-inflammatory activity (Sung & Lee, 1992).
The orientations of the carbonyl and hydrazide groups with respect to the aromatic ring are defined by the torsion angles C5—C4—C7—O1 31.9 (4)° and C5—C4—C7—N1 − 148.3 (3)°. The crystal structure is held together by two intermolecular hydrogen bonds, N1—H1···N2i and N2—H2N···O1ii (symmetry codes as in Table 1).