Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803012406/wn6167sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803012406/wn6167Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 217372
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (Co-O) = 0.001 Å
- R factor = 0.027
- wR factor = 0.068
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 29.7
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry
10 ml of 1 M CoCl2 solution, 10 ml of 1M H3PO4 solution and 0.5 g dicyandiamide were mixed together in a plastic bottle and heated to 353 K for 24 h, resulting in a purple solution. The solution was cooled to room temperature, and rod-like crystals of (I) grew as the solvent slowly evaporated. The dicyandiamide was transformed to guanylurea by slow acid hydrolysis.
The H atoms attached to atom O1 were located in difference maps and refined by riding in their as-found positions. The other H atoms were placed in idealized locations [d(N—H) = 0.86 Å] and refined by riding on their parent atom, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(parent atom) in all cases.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1999); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
(C2H7N4O)2[CoCl4(H2O)2] | F(000) = 450 |
Mr = 443.00 | Dx = 1.818 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 6.3488 (3) Å | Cell parameters from 3083 reflections |
b = 11.3392 (5) Å | θ = 2.6–32.4° |
c = 11.5436 (5) Å | µ = 1.75 mm−1 |
β = 103.1180 (1)° | T = 293 K |
V = 809.34 (6) Å3 | Block, purple |
Z = 2 | 0.26 × 0.19 × 0.13 mm |
Bruker SMART1000 CCD diffractometer | 2914 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2160 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.019 |
ω scans | θmax = 32.5°, θmin = 2.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) | h = −8→9 |
Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.810 | k = −17→17 |
7802 measured reflections | l = −16→17 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | Hydrogen site location: difmap (O-H) and geom (N-H) |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.96 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0356P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2914 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
98 parameters | Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
(C2H7N4O)2[CoCl4(H2O)2] | V = 809.34 (6) Å3 |
Mr = 443.00 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.3488 (3) Å | µ = 1.75 mm−1 |
b = 11.3392 (5) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 11.5436 (5) Å | 0.26 × 0.19 × 0.13 mm |
β = 103.1180 (1)° |
Bruker SMART1000 CCD diffractometer | 2914 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) | 2160 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.810 | Rint = 0.019 |
7802 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.96 | Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3 |
2914 reflections | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
98 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Co1 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.02519 (8) | |
Cl1 | 0.00034 (6) | 0.49559 (3) | 0.21078 (3) | 0.03329 (9) | |
Cl2 | 0.31559 (6) | 0.63849 (3) | 0.04533 (3) | 0.03150 (9) | |
O1 | 0.23677 (16) | 0.36722 (8) | 0.02831 (9) | 0.0288 (2) | |
H1 | 0.2265 | 0.2989 | 0.0004 | 0.035* | |
H2 | 0.3452 | 0.3945 | 0.0025 | 0.035* | |
O2 | 0.70085 (19) | 0.35117 (9) | 0.44223 (10) | 0.0409 (3) | |
N1 | 0.4719 (2) | 0.29772 (10) | 0.27020 (12) | 0.0394 (3) | |
H3 | 0.4909 | 0.2236 | 0.2843 | 0.047* | |
H4 | 0.3858 | 0.3211 | 0.2056 | 0.047* | |
N2 | 0.5279 (2) | 0.49248 (9) | 0.31399 (12) | 0.0306 (3) | |
H5 | 0.4288 | 0.5041 | 0.2506 | 0.037* | |
N3 | 0.5648 (2) | 0.69217 (10) | 0.32110 (12) | 0.0398 (3) | |
H6 | 0.6197 | 0.7563 | 0.3548 | 0.048* | |
H7 | 0.4714 | 0.6951 | 0.2543 | 0.048* | |
N4 | 0.7651 (2) | 0.58169 (11) | 0.47313 (11) | 0.0372 (3) | |
H8 | 0.8224 | 0.6445 | 0.5086 | 0.045* | |
H9 | 0.8009 | 0.5137 | 0.5044 | 0.045* | |
C1 | 0.5749 (2) | 0.37577 (12) | 0.34769 (13) | 0.0301 (3) | |
C2 | 0.6237 (2) | 0.58962 (12) | 0.37173 (13) | 0.0286 (3) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Co1 | 0.02434 (14) | 0.02235 (12) | 0.02850 (14) | 0.00140 (9) | 0.00516 (10) | 0.00021 (10) |
Cl1 | 0.0347 (2) | 0.03586 (18) | 0.03060 (18) | 0.00071 (14) | 0.01009 (15) | −0.00024 (14) |
Cl2 | 0.02900 (17) | 0.02758 (15) | 0.03733 (19) | −0.00376 (13) | 0.00631 (13) | 0.00077 (14) |
O1 | 0.0291 (5) | 0.0225 (4) | 0.0360 (5) | 0.0002 (4) | 0.0100 (4) | −0.0018 (4) |
O2 | 0.0451 (6) | 0.0284 (5) | 0.0408 (6) | 0.0001 (5) | −0.0077 (5) | 0.0070 (4) |
N1 | 0.0484 (8) | 0.0255 (6) | 0.0380 (7) | −0.0015 (5) | −0.0035 (6) | 0.0025 (5) |
N2 | 0.0304 (6) | 0.0242 (5) | 0.0329 (6) | 0.0013 (4) | −0.0018 (5) | 0.0025 (5) |
N3 | 0.0536 (8) | 0.0245 (6) | 0.0366 (7) | 0.0025 (5) | 0.0002 (6) | 0.0008 (5) |
N4 | 0.0386 (7) | 0.0290 (6) | 0.0384 (7) | −0.0001 (5) | −0.0028 (6) | −0.0019 (5) |
C1 | 0.0287 (7) | 0.0262 (6) | 0.0347 (8) | −0.0001 (5) | 0.0059 (6) | 0.0033 (5) |
C2 | 0.0282 (7) | 0.0265 (6) | 0.0316 (7) | 0.0009 (5) | 0.0078 (6) | −0.0009 (5) |
Co1—O1 | 2.1000 (9) | N1—H4 | 0.8600 |
Co1—O1i | 2.1000 (9) | N2—C2 | 1.3577 (17) |
Co1—Cl1 | 2.4332 (4) | N2—C1 | 1.3926 (16) |
Co1—Cl1i | 2.4332 (4) | N2—H5 | 0.8600 |
Co1—Cl2i | 2.5057 (3) | N3—C2 | 1.3170 (17) |
Co1—Cl2 | 2.5057 (3) | N3—H6 | 0.8600 |
O1—H1 | 0.8362 | N3—H7 | 0.8600 |
O1—H2 | 0.8667 | N4—C2 | 1.3066 (19) |
O2—C1 | 1.2297 (18) | N4—H8 | 0.8600 |
N1—C1 | 1.3212 (19) | N4—H9 | 0.8600 |
N1—H3 | 0.8600 | ||
O1—Co1—O1i | 180.0 | C1—N1—H3 | 120.0 |
O1—Co1—Cl1 | 89.51 (3) | C1—N1—H4 | 120.0 |
O1i—Co1—Cl1 | 90.49 (3) | H3—N1—H4 | 120.0 |
O1—Co1—Cl1i | 90.49 (3) | C2—N2—C1 | 126.17 (13) |
O1i—Co1—Cl1i | 89.51 (3) | C2—N2—H5 | 116.9 |
Cl1—Co1—Cl1i | 180.0 | C1—N2—H5 | 116.9 |
O1—Co1—Cl2i | 95.36 (3) | C2—N3—H6 | 120.0 |
O1i—Co1—Cl2i | 84.64 (3) | C2—N3—H7 | 120.0 |
Cl1—Co1—Cl2i | 90.869 (12) | H6—N3—H7 | 120.0 |
Cl1i—Co1—Cl2i | 89.131 (12) | C2—N4—H8 | 120.0 |
O1—Co1—Cl2 | 84.64 (3) | C2—N4—H9 | 120.0 |
O1i—Co1—Cl2 | 95.36 (3) | H8—N4—H9 | 120.0 |
Cl1—Co1—Cl2 | 89.131 (12) | O2—C1—N1 | 124.84 (13) |
Cl1i—Co1—Cl2 | 90.869 (12) | O2—C1—N2 | 121.23 (13) |
Cl2i—Co1—Cl2 | 180.000 (12) | N1—C1—N2 | 113.93 (13) |
Co1—O1—H1 | 127.9 | N4—C2—N3 | 121.77 (14) |
Co1—O1—H2 | 106.7 | N4—C2—N2 | 121.61 (13) |
H1—O1—H2 | 101.3 | N3—C2—N2 | 116.62 (13) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···O2ii | 0.84 | 1.82 | 2.6587 (13) | 179 |
O1—H2···Cl2iii | 0.87 | 2.37 | 3.1465 (10) | 149 |
N1—H3···Cl1iv | 0.86 | 2.59 | 3.4349 (12) | 170 |
N1—H4···O1 | 0.86 | 2.12 | 2.9586 (17) | 166 |
N2—H5···Cl1 | 0.86 | 2.66 | 3.2905 (14) | 132 |
N2—H5···Cl2 | 0.86 | 2.77 | 3.5040 (13) | 144 |
N3—H6···Cl2v | 0.86 | 2.56 | 3.3245 (14) | 148 |
N3—H6···Cl1vi | 0.86 | 2.87 | 3.4749 (12) | 129 |
N3—H7···Cl2 | 0.86 | 2.48 | 3.2743 (15) | 155 |
N4—H8···Cl2v | 0.86 | 2.50 | 3.2778 (13) | 151 |
N4—H9···O2 | 0.86 | 2.03 | 2.6571 (16) | 129 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iv) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | (C2H7N4O)2[CoCl4(H2O)2] |
Mr | 443.00 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.3488 (3), 11.3392 (5), 11.5436 (5) |
β (°) | 103.1180 (1) |
V (Å3) | 809.34 (6) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.75 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.26 × 0.19 × 0.13 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART1000 CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.650, 0.810 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7802, 2914, 2160 |
Rint | 0.019 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.756 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.027, 0.068, 0.96 |
No. of reflections | 2914 |
No. of parameters | 98 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.37, −0.29 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1999), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 1999), SHELXL97.
Co1—O1 | 2.1000 (9) | N2—C2 | 1.3577 (17) |
Co1—Cl1 | 2.4332 (4) | N2—C1 | 1.3926 (16) |
Co1—Cl2 | 2.5057 (3) | N3—C2 | 1.3170 (17) |
O2—C1 | 1.2297 (18) | N4—C2 | 1.3066 (19) |
N1—C1 | 1.3212 (19) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···O2i | 0.84 | 1.82 | 2.6587 (13) | 179 |
O1—H2···Cl2ii | 0.87 | 2.37 | 3.1465 (10) | 149 |
N1—H3···Cl1iii | 0.86 | 2.59 | 3.4349 (12) | 170 |
N1—H4···O1 | 0.86 | 2.12 | 2.9586 (17) | 166 |
N2—H5···Cl1 | 0.86 | 2.66 | 3.2905 (14) | 132 |
N2—H5···Cl2 | 0.86 | 2.77 | 3.5040 (13) | 144 |
N3—H6···Cl2iv | 0.86 | 2.56 | 3.3245 (14) | 148 |
N3—H6···Cl1v | 0.86 | 2.87 | 3.4749 (12) | 129 |
N3—H7···Cl2 | 0.86 | 2.48 | 3.2743 (15) | 155 |
N4—H8···Cl2iv | 0.86 | 2.50 | 3.2778 (13) | 151 |
N4—H9···O2 | 0.86 | 2.03 | 2.6571 (16) | 129 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (v) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The title compound, (I), arose as a side product during our synthetic investigations of organically templated cobalt phosphate networks (Cowley & Chippindale, 1999). It is isostructural with (C2H7N4O)2[CuCl4(H2O)2] (Begley et al., 1988) and (C2H7N4O)2[MnCl4(H2O)2] (Bremner & Harrison, 2003).
In (I), Co1 (site symmetry 2/m) has flattened, trans, octahedral coordination by two O (water) atoms and four Cl atoms. The cis bond angles lie between 84.64 (3) and 95.36 (3)°. The Co—O bond distance of 2.1000 (9) Å and the average Co—Cl separation of 2.4695 (4) Å correlate reasonably well with the ionic radius (IR) sums for the species involved [dIR(Co—O) = 2.09 Å and dIR(Co—Cl) = 2.56 Å], assuming the presence of high-spin Co2+ (Shannon, 1976). The [CuCl4(H2O)2]2− grouping in (C2H7N4O)2[CuCl4(H2O)2] (Begley et al., 1988) is much more distorted, with a Cu—O distance of 1.992 (3) Å and Cu—Cl bond lengths of 2.305 (1) and 2.791 (1) Å, which can be ascribed to a typical Jahn–Teller distortion for the d9 Cu2+ species.
The 1-carbamoylguanidinium (guanylurea) cation has normal geometrical parameters [dav(N—C) = 1.339 (3) Å], indicating significant delocalization of electrons over the non-hydrogen skeleton (Zaman & Darlow, 1986; Begley et al., 1988) and is essentially planar (for the non-H atoms, the r.m.s. deviation from the least-squares plane = 0.029 Å). A very acute (θ = 129°) intramolecular N4—H9···O2 hydrogen bond is present, which is typical for (C2H7N4O)+ (Bremner & Harrison, 2002).
The component species in (I) interact by way of an extensive hydrogen-bonding network (Table 2). The N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds to chloride ion acceptors involving H5 and H6 are bifurcated [dav(H···Cl) = 2.72 Å, dav(N···Cl) = 3.398 (2) Å and θav(N—H···Cl) = 138°], which is a characteristic `synthon' bonding motif for these species (Brammer et al., 2001). In this case, the pairs of chloride ions occupy an octahedral edge, with Cl1···Cl2 and Cl1i···Cl2ii [symmetry codes: (i) 1/2 − x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 − z; (ii) 1/2 + x, 3/2 − y, 1/2 + z] separations of 3.4662 (5) and 3.5190 (5) Å for the interactions involving H5 and H6, respectively. The hydrogen bonds involving H3, H7 and H8 are simple N—H···Cl links [dav(H···Cl) = 2.52 Å dav(N···Cl) = 3.329 (2) Å and θav(N—H···Cl) = 159°]. Overall, Cl1 accepts three and Cl2 accepts five hydrogen bonds.
The hydrogen-bonding scheme in (I) results in stacks of alternating [Co(H2O)2Cl4]2− octahedra and pairs of 1-carbamoylguanidinium species propagating along [010] (Fig. 2), which are held together by the O1—H1···O2i, N1—H3···Cl1iii, N3—H6···Cl2iv, and N4—H8···Cl2iv bonds (see Table 2 for the acceptor-atom symmetry codes). There may be pseudo π–π-stacking interactions involving the parallel 1-carbamoylguanidinium pairs, with resulting short contact distances of C1···N4vi = 3.346 (2) Å and C2···O2vi = 3.364 (2) Å [symmetry code: (vi) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z].
The stacks are fused into (101) pseudo-sheets by way of the N1—H4···O1, N2—H5···(Cl1, Cl2), N3—H6···Cl1v, and N3—H7···Cl2 bonds, which in turn are crosslinked by the O1—H2···Cl2ii bonds (symmetry codes as in Table 2), resulting in a three-dimensional structure.