

Supporting information
![]() | Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025901/xu2263sup1.cif |
![]() | Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025901/xu2263Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 654717
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean
(C-C) = 0.004 Å
- H-atom completeness 72%
- Disorder in main residue
- R factor = 0.038
- wR factor = 0.103
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.4
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.97 PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 1.00 Perc. PLAT311_ALERT_2_C Isolated Disordered Oxygen Atom (No H's ?) ..... >O31A PLAT311_ALERT_2_C Isolated Disordered Oxygen Atom (No H's ?) ..... <O31B
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C5 H7 Co1 O7 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C5 H5 Co1 O7 CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 2 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C5 H7 Co O7 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 10.00 10.00 0.00 H 14.00 10.00 4.00 Co 2.00 2.00 0.00 O 14.00 14.00 0.00
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 7 ALERT level C = Check and explain 3 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 5 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 3 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For related structures, see: Kumagai et al. (2002); O'Keeffe et al. (2000); Wells (1977); Yang et al. (2003).
All reagents and solvents were used as obtained without further purification. CoCl2.6H2O (0.6 mmol), H4btec (0.5 mmol) and NaOH (1.0 mmol) were dissolved in 8 ml of distilled water. The mixture was sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel and held at 383 K for 72 h. The vessel was gradually cooled to room temperature, and red crystals suitable for crystallographic analysis were obtained after 4 d.
The C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined in the riding-model approximation with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The H atoms of the coordinated water molecules were located in a difference Fourier map, and refined as riding model with O—H distances range from 0.82 to 0.85 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). The PLATON SQUEEZE procedure was used to treat regions of disordered guest molecules that could not be judiciously modeled in terms of atomic sites (Spek, 2003). The number of electrons thus located, 17 per unit cell, is assigned to two molecules of water solvent and is included in the formula, formula weight, calculated density, µ and F(000). There is difference between the reported and calculated values. Two largest residual densities located from the difference Fourier map separated by 1.93 Å are assigned to two disordered guest water molecules O31A and O31B. The refinement of relative site occupation factor leads to 0.53 and 0.47 for O31A and O31B, respectively. No attempt was made to locate hydrogen atoms of the disordered guest water molecules.
As shown in figure 1, a half of the Benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylic acid (H4btec) is observed in the crystallographic asymmetric unit with center of the benzene ring located on a crystallographic 1 position. The observation of symmetrical C?O bond lengths ranges from 1.250 (2) to 1.265 (3) Å indicates that all of the carboxyl groups of the H4btec are deprotonated to become the btec4- anion. The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains two crystallographic distinct CoII cations, located on crystallographic inversion centers with site occupation factor of 0.5. Each Co ion exists in an octahedral coordination environment (Table 1) formed by two water molecules and four carboxylate groups. The btec4- ligands bridges Co ions to form a three-dimensional metal-organic framework with one-dimensional channels in the [010] direction that are occupied by disordered guest water molecules and coordinated water molecules (Fig. 2). The formula of the compound is assigned to be [Co2(C10H2O8)(H2O)4.2H2O]n. A NiII analogue, and a CoII-btec coordination polymer with different contents of unit-cell packing were previously reported (Yang et al., 2003; Kumagai et al., 2002).
The network topology of the title compound is analyzed. The carbon atom of the carboxylate group serves as a simple three-connected node linking benzene ring and two Co ions. The benzene ring of the Benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylate ligand serves as a planar four-connected node. If coordinated water molecules are neglected, each Co ion also serves as a planar four-connected secondary building unit on the basis of four coordinated carboxylate groups. As a result, the title compound represents a new example of a (3,4)-connected net that is topologically related to Pt3O4 (waserite) (O'Keeffe et al., 2000; Wells, 1977).
The O—H···O hydroge bonding between coordinated water molecules and carboxyl groups helps to stabilize the crystal structure (Table 2).
For related structures, see: Kumagai et al. (2002); O'Keeffe et al. (2000); Wells (1977); Yang et al. (2003).
Data collection: XSCANS (Bruker, 1991); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
[Co2(C10H2O8)(H2O)4]·2H2O | Z = 2 |
Mr = 238.04 | F(000) = 240 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.966 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 6.9362 (7) Å | Cell parameters from 34 reflections |
b = 7.4559 (6) Å | θ = 5.6–12.8° |
c = 8.2797 (7) Å | µ = 2.14 mm−1 |
α = 90.342 (8)° | T = 298 K |
β = 109.848 (7)° | Column, red |
γ = 93.161 (7)° | 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm |
V = 402.00 (6) Å3 |
Bruker P4 diffractometer | 1570 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: sealed tube | Rint = 0.028 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.6° |
2θ/ω scans | h = −9→1 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.685, Tmax = 0.811 | l = −10→10 |
2314 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 24 reflections |
1883 independent reflections | intensity decay: 1.0% |
Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | H-atom parameters constrained |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0533P)2 + 0.4406P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.103 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.05 | Δρmax = 0.59 e Å−3 |
1883 reflections | Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 |
131 parameters |
[Co2(C10H2O8)(H2O)4]·2H2O | γ = 93.161 (7)° |
Mr = 238.04 | V = 402.00 (6) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 2 |
a = 6.9362 (7) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 7.4559 (6) Å | µ = 2.14 mm−1 |
c = 8.2797 (7) Å | T = 298 K |
α = 90.342 (8)° | 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm |
β = 109.848 (7)° |
Bruker P4 diffractometer | 1570 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.028 |
Tmin = 0.685, Tmax = 0.811 | 3 standard reflections every 24 reflections |
2314 measured reflections | intensity decay: 1.0% |
1883 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.103 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.05 | Δρmax = 0.59 e Å−3 |
1883 reflections | Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 |
131 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Co1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.01624 (16) | |
Co2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.01426 (16) | |
O1 | 0.1694 (3) | 0.2325 (3) | 0.6119 (3) | 0.0223 (4) | |
O2 | 0.4875 (3) | 0.3576 (3) | 0.7123 (3) | 0.0227 (4) | |
O3 | 0.2645 (3) | −0.1283 (3) | 0.5378 (3) | 0.0268 (5) | |
O4 | 0.5570 (3) | −0.2620 (3) | 0.6499 (2) | 0.0175 (4) | |
O21 | 0.0391 (4) | 0.0928 (4) | 0.2669 (3) | 0.0342 (6) | |
H21A | 0.151 | 0.1538 | 0.2826 | 0.051* | |
H21B | −0.0337 | 0.0886 | 0.1656 | 0.051* | |
O22 | 0.1793 (3) | 0.5155 (3) | 0.3953 (3) | 0.0265 (5) | |
H22A | 0.1224 | 0.6092 | 0.404 | 0.04* | |
H22B | 0.1421 | 0.4397 | 0.4559 | 0.04* | |
O31A | −0.0980 (8) | 0.2254 (8) | −0.0766 (7) | 0.0469 (18) | 0.527 (8) |
O31B | −0.1415 (13) | 0.4510 (14) | 0.0178 (11) | 0.089 (4) | 0.473 (8) |
C1 | 0.3523 (4) | 0.2411 (4) | 0.7155 (3) | 0.0155 (5) | |
C2 | 0.4193 (4) | 0.1081 (4) | 0.8574 (3) | 0.0150 (5) | |
C3 | 0.4640 (4) | −0.0677 (4) | 0.8333 (3) | 0.0136 (5) | |
C4 | 0.4246 (4) | −0.1563 (4) | 0.6596 (3) | 0.0145 (5) | |
C5 | 0.4549 (4) | 0.1741 (4) | 1.0238 (3) | 0.0163 (5) | |
H5A | 0.4241 | 0.2912 | 1.0399 | 0.02* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Co1 | 0.0143 (3) | 0.0151 (3) | 0.0165 (3) | 0.00031 (19) | 0.0018 (2) | −0.00175 (19) |
Co2 | 0.0178 (3) | 0.0117 (3) | 0.0122 (2) | −0.00056 (19) | 0.00392 (19) | −0.00044 (18) |
O1 | 0.0210 (10) | 0.0161 (10) | 0.0224 (10) | −0.0007 (8) | −0.0018 (8) | 0.0031 (8) |
O2 | 0.0236 (11) | 0.0234 (11) | 0.0181 (9) | −0.0065 (8) | 0.0042 (8) | 0.0048 (8) |
O3 | 0.0238 (11) | 0.0343 (13) | 0.0170 (10) | 0.0117 (9) | −0.0015 (8) | −0.0091 (9) |
O4 | 0.0177 (9) | 0.0163 (9) | 0.0170 (9) | 0.0033 (7) | 0.0035 (8) | −0.0042 (7) |
O21 | 0.0222 (11) | 0.0541 (16) | 0.0214 (11) | −0.0087 (11) | 0.0028 (9) | 0.0053 (10) |
O22 | 0.0219 (10) | 0.0225 (11) | 0.0346 (12) | 0.0025 (9) | 0.0088 (9) | −0.0006 (9) |
O31A | 0.038 (3) | 0.059 (4) | 0.040 (3) | −0.001 (3) | 0.009 (2) | 0.004 (3) |
O31B | 0.068 (6) | 0.092 (7) | 0.067 (5) | −0.026 (5) | −0.023 (4) | 0.007 (5) |
C1 | 0.0210 (13) | 0.0127 (12) | 0.0120 (11) | 0.0002 (10) | 0.0048 (10) | −0.0032 (9) |
C2 | 0.0143 (12) | 0.0158 (12) | 0.0127 (11) | −0.0026 (10) | 0.0025 (10) | −0.0019 (9) |
C3 | 0.0140 (12) | 0.0147 (12) | 0.0107 (11) | −0.0023 (9) | 0.0032 (9) | −0.0035 (9) |
C4 | 0.0174 (12) | 0.0129 (12) | 0.0130 (11) | −0.0008 (10) | 0.0052 (10) | −0.0026 (9) |
C5 | 0.0201 (13) | 0.0131 (12) | 0.0158 (12) | 0.0007 (10) | 0.0062 (10) | −0.0018 (9) |
Co1—O1 | 2.065 (2) | O3—C4 | 1.250 (3) |
Co1—O1i | 2.065 (2) | O4—C4 | 1.264 (3) |
Co1—O3i | 2.046 (2) | O4—Co2v | 2.0996 (19) |
Co1—O3 | 2.046 (2) | O21—H21A | 0.8472 |
Co1—O21 | 2.151 (2) | O21—H21B | 0.8188 |
Co1—O21i | 2.151 (2) | O22—H22A | 0.8359 |
Co2—O2ii | 2.083 (2) | O22—H22B | 0.8447 |
Co2—O2 | 2.083 (2) | C1—C2 | 1.508 (4) |
Co2—O4iii | 2.0996 (19) | C2—C3 | 1.392 (4) |
Co2—O4iv | 2.0996 (19) | C2—C5 | 1.395 (3) |
Co2—O22 | 2.105 (2) | C3—C5vi | 1.398 (4) |
Co2—O22ii | 2.105 (2) | C3—C4 | 1.511 (3) |
O1—C1 | 1.265 (3) | C5—C3vi | 1.398 (4) |
O2—C1 | 1.250 (3) | C5—H5A | 0.93 |
O3i—Co1—O3 | 180.00 (12) | O4iv—Co2—O22ii | 96.15 (8) |
O3i—Co1—O1 | 89.65 (9) | O22—Co2—O22ii | 180.0000 (10) |
O3—Co1—O1 | 90.35 (9) | C1—O1—Co1 | 125.58 (19) |
O3i—Co1—O1i | 90.35 (9) | C1—O2—Co2 | 126.83 (18) |
O3—Co1—O1i | 89.65 (9) | C4—O3—Co1 | 137.74 (18) |
O1—Co1—O1i | 180 | C4—O4—Co2v | 126.45 (17) |
O3i—Co1—O21 | 94.40 (10) | Co1—O21—H21A | 113.9 |
O3—Co1—O21 | 85.60 (10) | Co1—O21—H21B | 134.3 |
O1—Co1—O21 | 85.35 (9) | H21A—O21—H21B | 111.6 |
O1i—Co1—O21 | 94.65 (9) | Co2—O22—H22A | 121.8 |
O3i—Co1—O21i | 85.60 (10) | Co2—O22—H22B | 99.9 |
O3—Co1—O21i | 94.40 (10) | H22A—O22—H22B | 105.4 |
O1—Co1—O21i | 94.65 (9) | O2—C1—O1 | 124.3 (3) |
O1i—Co1—O21i | 85.35 (9) | O2—C1—C2 | 115.2 (2) |
O21—Co1—O21i | 180.0000 (10) | O1—C1—C2 | 120.4 (2) |
O2ii—Co2—O2 | 180.0000 (10) | C3—C2—C5 | 119.3 (2) |
O2ii—Co2—O4iii | 91.12 (8) | C3—C2—C1 | 124.0 (2) |
O2—Co2—O4iii | 88.88 (8) | C5—C2—C1 | 116.4 (2) |
O2ii—Co2—O4iv | 88.88 (8) | C2—C3—C5vi | 119.4 (2) |
O2—Co2—O4iv | 91.12 (8) | C2—C3—C4 | 124.2 (2) |
O4iii—Co2—O4iv | 180 | C5vi—C3—C4 | 116.4 (2) |
O2ii—Co2—O22 | 86.24 (9) | O3—C4—O4 | 123.9 (2) |
O2—Co2—O22 | 93.76 (9) | O3—C4—C3 | 119.9 (2) |
O4iii—Co2—O22 | 96.15 (8) | O4—C4—C3 | 116.1 (2) |
O4iv—Co2—O22 | 83.85 (8) | C2—C5—C3vi | 121.4 (2) |
O2ii—Co2—O22ii | 93.76 (9) | C2—C5—H5A | 119.3 |
O2—Co2—O22ii | 86.24 (9) | C3vi—C5—H5A | 119.3 |
O4iii—Co2—O22ii | 83.85 (8) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (v) x, y−1, z; (vi) −x+1, −y, −z+2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O21—H21A···O4iv | 0.85 | 2.03 | 2.864 (3) | 169 |
O21—H21B···O31A | 0.82 | 2.17 | 2.876 (6) | 144 |
O22—H22A···O3iii | 0.84 | 2.25 | 2.848 (3) | 129 |
O22—H22B···O1 | 0.84 | 1.99 | 2.790 (3) | 157 |
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Co2(C10H2O8)(H2O)4]·2H2O |
Mr | 238.04 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.9362 (7), 7.4559 (6), 8.2797 (7) |
α, β, γ (°) | 90.342 (8), 109.848 (7), 93.161 (7) |
V (Å3) | 402.00 (6) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.14 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker P4 |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.685, 0.811 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2314, 1883, 1570 |
Rint | 0.028 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.661 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.038, 0.103, 1.05 |
No. of reflections | 1883 |
No. of parameters | 131 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.59, −0.77 |
Computer programs: XSCANS (Bruker, 1991), XSCANS, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Co1—O1 | 2.065 (2) | Co2—O2 | 2.083 (2) |
Co1—O3 | 2.046 (2) | Co2—O4i | 2.0996 (19) |
Co1—O21 | 2.151 (2) | Co2—O22 | 2.105 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O21—H21A···O4ii | 0.85 | 2.03 | 2.864 (3) | 169 |
O21—H21B···O31A | 0.82 | 2.17 | 2.876 (6) | 144 |
O22—H22A···O3i | 0.84 | 2.25 | 2.848 (3) | 129 |
O22—H22B···O1 | 0.84 | 1.99 | 2.790 (3) | 157 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1. |

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
As shown in figure 1, a half of the Benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylic acid (H4btec) is observed in the crystallographic asymmetric unit with center of the benzene ring located on a crystallographic 1 position. The observation of symmetrical C?O bond lengths ranges from 1.250 (2) to 1.265 (3) Å indicates that all of the carboxyl groups of the H4btec are deprotonated to become the btec4- anion. The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains two crystallographic distinct CoII cations, located on crystallographic inversion centers with site occupation factor of 0.5. Each Co ion exists in an octahedral coordination environment (Table 1) formed by two water molecules and four carboxylate groups. The btec4- ligands bridges Co ions to form a three-dimensional metal-organic framework with one-dimensional channels in the [010] direction that are occupied by disordered guest water molecules and coordinated water molecules (Fig. 2). The formula of the compound is assigned to be [Co2(C10H2O8)(H2O)4.2H2O]n. A NiII analogue, and a CoII-btec coordination polymer with different contents of unit-cell packing were previously reported (Yang et al., 2003; Kumagai et al., 2002).
The network topology of the title compound is analyzed. The carbon atom of the carboxylate group serves as a simple three-connected node linking benzene ring and two Co ions. The benzene ring of the Benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylate ligand serves as a planar four-connected node. If coordinated water molecules are neglected, each Co ion also serves as a planar four-connected secondary building unit on the basis of four coordinated carboxylate groups. As a result, the title compound represents a new example of a (3,4)-connected net that is topologically related to Pt3O4 (waserite) (O'Keeffe et al., 2000; Wells, 1977).
The O—H···O hydroge bonding between coordinated water molecules and carboxyl groups helps to stabilize the crystal structure (Table 2).